Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. Sofia2750 [2026] SCR 2

[_budo]

Case Filing

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION


Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Sofia2750
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

PROSECUTING AUTHORITY REPORT

Sofia2750 was found distributing named flowers advertising her and Ameslap's Mayoral ticket within 50 blocks of the Town Hall.

I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont
2. Sofia2750

II. FACTS
1. In response to a report received by the Department of Justice, Lead investigator Rookieblue14 filed a search warrant for drop logs of named flowers advertising Sofia2750 and Ameslap's mayoral ticket. (P-001)
2. Sofia2570 distributed 10 such flowers within 50 blocks of the Town Hall. (P-002, P-003, P-004, P-005, P-006, P-007)
3. According to the restrictions set out in §11(2) of the Electoral Act, campaign-related advertising including physical propaganda is prohibited within 50 blocks of a building where a polling place is located.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. One count of Harassment of a Polling Place, per Part II, Section 8 of the Criminal Code Act. This offence is committed when a person
"Engages in any conduct inside a building containing a polling place or within 50 blocks of a building where a polling place is located that:
(i) interferes with the freedom of voters to vote; or
(ii) disrupts the administration of the polling place; or
(iii) violates the restrictions set out in §11(2) of the Electoral Act".
According to §11(2) of the Electoral Act, the restrictions set are:
"campaign-related advertising (Includes, but is not limited to, physical campaign propaganda and person-to-person campaigning) is prohibited within:
(a) within 50 blocks of a building where a polling place is located; or
(b) inside a building containing a polling place."
The Defendant had distributed physical campaigning material in the form of named flowers advertising her and Ameslap's mayoral ticket, and was thus in direct violation of this statute.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. A 100 Penalty Unit Fine, and 10 minutes of imprisonment, with respect to one count of first offence of Harassment of a Polling Place.

NOTE: While the Commonwealth does not recommend the maximum CCA sentence for this crime, the maximum sentence does include two months disqualification from office. Following the SCR 21 verdict wherein the court stated that the sentencing recommendation given by the commonwealth need not be followed by a presiding Judicial officer, the jurisdiction in this case must be to the Supreme Court as it involves disqualification from office.

V. WITNESS LIST
Rookieblue14 - Investigator
Multiman155 - Witnessed the event

VI. EVIDENCE

Spoiler: P-001

Warrant Transcript.pdf (attached at the end)

Spoiler: P-002

Staff Ticket Transcript.pdf (attached at the end)

Spoiler: P-003

Spoiler: P-004

Spoiler: P-005

Spoiler: P-006

Spoiler: P-007

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 19th day of January, 2026