Lawsuit: Adjourned royalsnakee v. IIKermitII [2024] DCR 7

[royalsnakee]

​

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


royalsnakee
Plaintiff

v.

IIKermitII
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff would like to state that Mr. Kermit the Defendant was causing me quite the amount of grievous endowments starting with, The Violent Offenses act where the Defendant Violated Several Clauses included but not limited to; Attempted Murder:
Attempted Murder (Original: Icypenguin79 - Feb 21, 2021)
(i) Classification: Summary Criminal Offense
The act of repetitively hitting a player, causing a loss of more than 3 hearts. This crime overrides Assault.
Per Offense: $75 Fine + 5 Minutes Jail Time
Also Murder:
(7) Murder (Original: LilDigiVert - Dec 4, 2021)
(i) Classification: Summary Criminal Offense
The act of unlawfully killing another player. This law overrides attempted murder, assault, and trespassing.
Per Offence: $100 fine + 10 minutes jail time

And the Serial Killing Act as Pursuant with such act it is as follows:
13.24 - Serial Killing
(i) Classification: Indictable Criminal Offense
The act of unlawfully killing more than 7 players. This law overrides attempted murder, murder, assault, and trespassing.
Per Offence: 200$ per murder + the maximum jail time allowed for one arrest. Since the Defendant Killed me 15 times
False Self Defense,
(4) Falsely Claiming Self Defense
(i) Classification: Indictable Criminal Offense
The act of falsely claiming you acted under self defense when committing another crime.
Per Offense: Doubles the punishment for all crimes which were claimed to be under self defense.

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I was in Prison with IIKermitII doing my time like a Good Citizen then he started to hit me and assault and batter me and harass me calling me a "Prison Bitch" as he quoted and kept telling me and everyone that I was "getting bitched" so I had no choice but to defend myself and kill him back several times but then he claimed False Self Defense and told the Local Law enforcement to Indict me which caused me to face another hour of time.

I. PARTIES
1. royalsnakee (Connor Laff rp name)
2. IIKermitII

II. FACTS
1. We were both guilty of harming one another and it was unlawful for him to go off free and for me to be punished when it was him who started it.
2. The Police needs to watch more carefully with the crimes in the prison and that situation needs to be controlled.
3. I informed this person that I would be suing him for these reasons

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. These facts give rise to a claim because he was killing me as stated previously in this bill he was attempting murder and he was doing other heinous acts.
2. Also because of the blatant and inconceivable amounts of times I was killed this also makes it pursuant to the Serial Killings act which should double his charges and hence the charges he needs to pay when he is found guilty.
3. Also pursuant with the Criminally threatening act. He was threatening my life and saying things like "I bitched you and get bitched and I'm going to really kill you now and making me fear for my life.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. I would like $2,500 in Emotional Damages, Humiliation and
2. Legal Fees for this work that I am not being paid for at the Law Firm that I work of $500
3. Also 2,500 in Outrageous conduct from the Offending Party

(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)
OllieWollie3

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

 

[Anthony]

AMICUS BRIEF
I request to file an Amicus Brief.

 

[royalsnakee]

Ah, As a State Prosecutor a Police Officer and several other great things in the Department of Justice your Opinion would be a great and probable thing and it could greatly Help Our Case; Please do assist with Such a motion. I wouldn't mind your Advice and your Expertise, Mr. Anthony

 

[Anthony]

You're honor,
I am neutral in this case, I am neither the plaintiff or defendant. If we take a look at the Clarity Act and how it states we can use the Oxford Dictionary to find out what an Amicus Brief/Amicus Curiae is.

It states:

"Originally, and still in some jurisdictions: an impartial adviser to a court of law who assists in some matter affecting a particular case"

I am providing an Amicus Brief to volunteer to provide some insight into this case.

 

[DavidOliva]

.

 

[kermi]

id like to add there was no complain when those instances took place therefore he was consenting for me to go unpunished there is a 1 minute timer to complain yet the opportunity was not taken so your evidence is not valid

 

[ko531]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS
The Defendant, @kermi is required to appear before the District Court in the case of royalsnakee v. IIKermitII [2024] DCR 7. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case. Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​

 

[ko531]

AMICUS BRIEF
I request to file an Amicus Brief.

You may file your Amicus Brief, You have 72 hours to do so

 

[kermi]

Reporting for court

 

[ko531]

Reporting for court

Please file either an Answer to Complaint or Motion to dismiss in the next 72 hours

 

[kermi]

Your honor I would like to counter sue, due to the stress the plaintiff has caused me. Now I don't feel any need to be greedy so I am requesting the same amount of money as requested of me from the plaintiff. Thank you

 

[ko531]

Your honor I would like to counter sue, due to the stress the plaintiff has caused me. Now I don't feel any need to be greedy so I am requesting the same amount of money as requested of me from the plaintiff. Thank you

Please use the proper formatting in the future. Your counter sue is duly noted

 

[Anthony]

Thank you you're honor for allowing me to file an Amicus Brief

If we take a look at the evidence that the claims the plaintiff posted we can see that they are saying Serial Killing and Attempted Murder. These crimes are supposed to go through the DOJ. If we take a look at [2023] DCR 49, Justice Dartanman says that since the player has been punished, no damages will be given. The plaintiff, would need to report this crime to the Department of Justice of the defendant, thus the emotional damages and the "outrages conduct" does not add up if the plaintiff did not report the defendant to the Department of Justice. Also, Attempted Murder is a Summary Criminal Offense, which should go through Department of Justice and Serial Killing is indictable Criminal Offense which should go through the Dept. Legal Affairs.

 

[Alexander P. Love]

Thank you you're honor for allowing me to file an Amicus Brief

If we take a look at the evidence that the claims the plaintiff posted we can see that they are saying Serial Killing and Attempted Murder. These crimes are supposed to go through the DOJ. If we take a look at [2023] DCR 49, Justice Dartanman says that since the player has been punished, no damages will be given. The plaintiff, would need to report this crime to the Department of Justice of the defendant, thus the emotional damages and the "outrages conduct" does not add up if the plaintiff did not report the defendant to the Department of Justice. Also, Attempted Murder is a Summary Criminal Offense, which should go through Department of Justice and Serial Killing is indictable Criminal Offense which should go through the Dept. Legal Affairs.

Your honor, I’d like to file an amicus brief.

 

[ko531]

Your honor, I’d like to file an amicus brief.

You may file one in the next 72 hours.

 

[royalsnakee]

Your Honor, All due respect but Mr.Kermit doesn't even have proper representation and nor is he able to counter sue because he is the guilty party and you have seen proof that he had malicious intent and that it was clearly his fault.

 

[Towloo]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT


royalsnakee
Plaintiff

V


IIKermitII
Defendant


ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

1. The defense disputes fact one because although both parties were guilty of harming one another, there is no proof to show my client started it
2. The defense affirms fact two, however, notes that it has nothing to do with my client
3. The defense disputes fact three because the plaintiff quite literally stated it was for money, and that there was no reason (The attached file).

DEFENSES

1. Although my client did in fact murder the plaintiff multiple times, in all cases, it was in self-defense, as the plaintiff remarks he was punished for murders (the murders of IIKermitII). Assaulting is enough to qualify for self-defense, and therefore my client’s murders were made in self-defense.
2. Opposing counsel is right about Serial Killings, however, as Anthony’s Amicus Brief shows, those are supposed to go through a DOJ ticket (which they weren’t). None of this matters, however, due to the fact that the crimes were committed in self-defense. Even if what the plaintiff said was true, he never used the command “/complaint” to make my client wanted, and therefore, didn’t want my client to be punished for them (likely so he had a stronger standing in court).
3. The evidence shown by opposing counsel only shows one rude remark by my client, who is remorseful about making it. Being repeatedly ganged up on by the plaintiff and acting in self-defense would make anyone say something to the offending party. Additionally, respect is a rule that staff would handle, so if the plaintiff wishes to take up the matter, he may make a staff ticket.

 

[Towloo]

Your Honor, All due respect but Mr.Kermit doesn't even have proper representation and nor is he able to counter sue because he is the guilty party and you have seen proof that he had malicious intent and that it was clearly his fault.

I will be representing IIKermitII your honor.

 

[Towloo]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT


royalsnakee
Plaintiff

V


IIKermitII
Defendant


ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

1. The defense disputes fact one because although both parties were guilty of harming one another, there is no proof to show my client started it
2. The defense affirms fact two, however, notes that it has nothing to do with my client
3. The defense disputes fact three because the plaintiff quite literally stated it was for money, and that there was no reason (The attached file).

DEFENSES

1. Although my client did in fact murder the plaintiff multiple times, in all cases, it was in self-defense, as the plaintiff remarks he was punished for murders (the murders of IIKermitII). Assaulting is enough to qualify for self-defense, and therefore my client’s murders were made in self-defense.
2. Opposing counsel is right about Serial Killings, however, as Anthony’s Amicus Brief shows, those are supposed to go through a DOJ ticket (which they weren’t). None of this matters, however, due to the fact that the crimes were committed in self-defense. Even if what the plaintiff said was true, he never used the command “/complaint” to make my client wanted, and therefore, didn’t want my client to be punished for them (likely so he had a stronger standing in court).
3. The evidence shown by opposing counsel only shows one rude remark by my client, who is remorseful about making it. Being repeatedly ganged up on by the plaintiff and acting in self-defense would make anyone say something to the offending party. Additionally, respect is a rule that staff would handle, so if the plaintiff wishes to take up the matter, he may make a staff ticket.

You honor, I seem to have made a mistake. Under defense 2, I meant to say "DLA ticket," not "DOJ ticket." Permission to change this, and only this.

 

[royalsnakee]

Your Honor all due respect but I would like to cross examine the Defendant, Because they are committing Perjury your Honor we have multiple witnesses and it was more of a back and forth than it was anything and legitimately he started the debacle
and it is not my responsibility

 

[royalsnakee]

Objection your honor Perjury and Relevance

As per the Legal lineage of The Violent Offenses Act this is what Self Defense is defined as

2) Self Defense (Original: FracturedGhast7 - Jun 27, 2021)
(i) A reasonable and proportionate defensive response to an imminent threat where a criminal action against the individual or property has been directly made, threatened, or implied.
(ii) Crimes committed can be appealed under a claim of self defense, at which point all punishments are to be delayed until after the appeal.
According to this your Honor. 18 times he killed me Egregious and also more times than I killed him at my 15 it was also brutal and disgusting that he purposely killed me with my head and with other weapons your Honor. Which also would make him the AGGRESSOR. not the one being aggressed.

 

[royalsnakee]

He was the one doing the Threatening
As per the Verbally Threatening Act

2- Verbally Threatening
(1) This will follow the punishments of Assault.
(2) This is active when a player is threatening another player with the use of a gun and/or weapons or through any forms of communication, in order to put them in danger to prompt them to commit an action.
(3) When a player on the street says: "I'll kill you!”, is an example of not verbally threatening another pla

 

[Towloo]

He was the one doing the Threatening
As per the Verbally Threatening Act

2- Verbally Threatening
(1) This will follow the punishments of Assault.
(2) This is active when a player is threatening another player with the use of a gun and/or weapons or through any forms of communication, in order to put them in danger to prompt them to commit an action.
(3) When a player on the street says: "I'll kill you!”, is an example of not verbally threatening another pla

Opposing council hasn't presented proof of this.

 

[royalsnakee]

IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO Compel

The Plaintiff moves that you compel the Department of Justice to show the Kill records between me and the defendant proving that it was not self defense but perjury.

1. As to support my Objection and to show new evidence into the case.
2. Please grant this your Honor.

DATED: This (20) day of (Feburary) (2024)

 

[royalsnakee]

Opposing council hasn't presented proof of this.

Objection Speculation and Badgering

 

[royalsnakee]

Your Honor, I would like to question and cross-examine the defendant

 

[Anthony]

You’re honor,

Just so the court is clear my amicus brief was towards the plantiff being incorrect in some way, not the defendant.

 

[Towloo]

Objection your honor Perjury and Relevance

As per the Legal lineage of The Violent Offenses Act this is what Self Defense is defined as

2) Self Defense (Original: FracturedGhast7 - Jun 27, 2021)
(i) A reasonable and proportionate defensive response to an imminent threat where a criminal action against the individual or property has been directly made, threatened, or implied.
(ii) Crimes committed can be appealed under a claim of self defense, at which point all punishments are to be delayed until after the appeal.
According to this your Honor. 18 times he killed me Egregious and also more times than I killed him at my 15 it was also brutal and disgusting that he purposely killed me with my head and with other weapons your Honor. Which also would make him the

The definition of speculation is "When a witness is asked to testify about something they have not directly observed. Witnesses are only allowed to testify about their own direct experiences and thoughts." We haven't reached testimony yet, and therefore this objection isn't relevant to my statement. The definition of badgering is "counsel is antagonizing the witness to provoke a response, either by asking questions without giving the witness an opportunity to answer or by openly mocking the witness." Again, we have not reached witness testimony yet and therefore both of these claims are invalidated.

 

[royalsnakee]

Your Honor according to the Rights of the Court I would like to Request an Ingame Trial.

 

[Towloo]

I meant to reply to the objection on speculation and badgering.

 

[royalsnakee]

Your Honor I would like to sidebar with Opposing Counsel.

 

[Towloo]

Your Honor according to the Rights of the Court I would like to Request an Ingame Trial.

I do not agree to this.

 

[royalsnakee]

Your Honor I motion to Settle this Via Trial by Combat as According to the Trial by Combat Act

A
BILL
To

Recognize Trial by Combat

The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives and Senators in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following provisions into law:

1 - Short Title and Enactment
(1) This Act may be cited as the “Trial by Combat Act”.
(2) This Act shall be enacted immediately upon its signage.
(3) Authored by President hugebob23456

2 - Reasons
(1) Consenting individuals should hold the right to settle their differences how they choose.

3 - Terms
(1) In the event that any entity sues another, either the Plaintiff or the Defendant may request a Trial by Combat at any time. In the event that both the Plaintiff and the Defendant agree to a Trial by Combat, they shall settle the case through in game PvP. Any rules for the combat must be agreed upon by both parties prior to the fight, and the fight must be witnessed by a Judge or any individual which both parties agree to serve as a witness to certify the outcome. The verdict determined by any case settled through Trial by Combat shall be inadmissible as evidence in any other lawsuit, and shall not constitute precedent in any manner. During a Trial by Combat, the players may commit PvP upon one another without legal repercussions.

 

[royalsnakee]

Your Honor this would be a sword fight in diamond with some Golden Apples perhaps in the wild or in a public place to settle this your Honor
if the Opposing Counsel isn't too cowardly this could be an interesting ending

 

[royalsnakee]

I would also be Open to a Fist fight or something to end this the same way it started your Honor

 

[Towloo]

Objection your honor Perjury and Relevance

As per the Legal lineage of The Violent Offenses Act this is what Self Defense is defined as

2) Self Defense (Original: FracturedGhast7 - Jun 27, 2021)
(i) A reasonable and proportionate defensive response to an imminent threat where a criminal action against the individual or property has been directly made, threatened, or implied.
(ii) Crimes committed can be appealed under a claim of self defense, at which point all punishments are to be delayed until after the appeal.
According to this your Honor. 18 times he killed me Egregious and also more times than I killed him at my 15 it was also brutal and disgusting that he purposely killed me with my head and with other weapons your Honor. Which also would make him the AGGRESSOR. not the one being aggressed.

The definition of perjury in the objection guide states "When a witness has perjured themselves on the stand by lying or strongly misrepresenting facts on the stand (proof of perjury should be made with the objection)." Once again, we have not reached witness testimony yet. The definition of relevance in the objection guide states "When a party has presented evidence that is not relevant to the case, or asks a witness a question that may not be relevant." The evidence attached to my answer shows that the plaintiff was suing for money which directly defies one of the facts, therefore, it was indeed relevant.

 

[ko531]

A lot was said and I am going to adress this in order and in one message to avoid confusion.

Your Honor, All due respect but Mr.Kermit doesn't even have proper representation and nor is he able to counter sue because he is the guilty party and you have seen proof that he had malicious intent and that it was clearly his fault.

Kermit does not need "proper representation" as he has the right to represent himself.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT


royalsnakee
Plaintiff

V


IIKermitII
Defendant


ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

1. The defense disputes fact one because although both parties were guilty of harming one another, there is no proof to show my client started it
2. The defense affirms fact two, however, notes that it has nothing to do with my client
3. The defense disputes fact three because the plaintiff quite literally stated it was for money, and that there was no reason (The attached file).

DEFENSES

1. Although my client did in fact murder the plaintiff multiple times, in all cases, it was in self-defense, as the plaintiff remarks he was punished for murders (the murders of IIKermitII). Assaulting is enough to qualify for self-defense, and therefore my client’s murders were made in self-defense.
2. Opposing counsel is right about Serial Killings, however, as Anthony’s Amicus Brief shows, those are supposed to go through a DOJ ticket (which they weren’t). None of this matters, however, due to the fact that the crimes were committed in self-defense. Even if what the plaintiff said was true, he never used the command “/complaint” to make my client wanted, and therefore, didn’t want my client to be punished for them (likely so he had a stronger standing in court).
3. The evidence shown by opposing counsel only shows one rude remark by my client, who is remorseful about making it. Being repeatedly ganged up on by the plaintiff and acting in self-defense would make anyone say something to the offending party. Additionally, respect is a rule that staff would handle, so if the plaintiff wishes to take up the matter, he may make a staff ticket.

May I have evidence that the defendant has agreed to you being their legal counsel.

Your Honor all due respect but I would like to cross examine the Defendant, Because they are committing Perjury your Honor we have multiple witnesses and it was more of a back and forth than it was anything and legitimately he started the debacle
and it is not my responsibility

You may do that in during witness testimony


The Objection for Perjury and Relevance is Overruled as the amount of times murdered or the choice in murder weapon does not make someone the "aggressor" in a particular situation.

The Objection for Speculation and Badgering is Overruled as it is clearly neither Badgering nor Speculation as Badgering is about asking witnesses questions and the Defense is not Speculating anything only stating the lack of proof/evidence. I will however tell the defense that evidence does not need to be provided until discovery, If the lack of evidence is an issue after discovery then it may be brought up again at that time.

Your Honor I would like to sidebar with Opposing Counsel.

Why would the plaintiff like a sidebar?

IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO Compel

The Plaintiff moves that you compel the Department of Justice to show the Kill records between me and the defendant proving that it was not self defense but perjury.

1. As to support my Objection and to show new evidence into the case.
2. Please grant this your Honor.

DATED: This (20) day of (Feburary) (2024)

I will be granting the Motion to Compel. If the DOJ(@JoanM999) has the kill records between Royalsnakee and IIkermitII please provide them otherwise state that you can not.

Your Honor this would be a sword fight in diamond with some Golden Apples perhaps in the wild or in a public place to settle this your Honor
if the Opposing Counsel isn't too cowardly this could be an interesting ending

Does the Defense agree to a trial by Combat?


Lastly I am issuing a warning to both sides to not spam the court case with messages. No Message will go unread so please refrain from repeating yourself.

 

[kermi]

May I have evidence that the defendant has agreed to you being their legal counsel.

I agree

 

[JoanM999]

A lot was said and I am going to adress this in order and in one message to avoid confusion.

Kermit does not need "proper representation" as he has the right to represent himself.


May I have evidence that the defendant has agreed to you being their legal counsel.


You may do that in during witness testimony


The Objection for Perjury and Relevance is Overruled as the amount of times murdered or the choice in murder weapon does not make someone the "aggressor" in a particular situation.

The Objection for Speculation and Badgering is Overruled as it is clearly neither Badgering nor Speculation as Badgering is about asking witnesses questions and the Defense is not Speculating anything only stating the lack of proof/evidence. I will however tell the defense that evidence does not need to be provided until discovery, If the lack of evidence is an issue after discovery then it may be brought up again at that time.


Why would the plaintiff like a sidebar?


I will be granting the Motion to Compel. If the DOJ(@JoanM999) has the kill records between Royalsnakee and IIkermitII please provide them otherwise state that you can not.


Does the Defense agree to a trial by Combat?


Lastly I am issuing a warning to both sides to not spam the court case with messages. No Message will go unread so please refrain from repeating yourself.

Hello Your Honor

The Doj doesnt Have the Logs

 

[Towloo]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS


royalsnakee
Plaintiff


V


IIKermitII
Defendant



1) 5.12: Opposing counsel doesn’t have a very significant standing, as when looking at the attached file, he is clearly suing to take my client's money. Opposing counsel even states "I live in LA. We don't need a reason." In regard to why he was suing.

ATTACHMENTS

 

[Towloo]

The plaintiff agrees to the trial by combat, however, would like for the ruling on the above motion to be posted first. If the case is dismissed, then there is no need for a trial by combat anymore.

 

[Towloo]

As for the sidebar, I agree.

 

[royalsnakee]

Objection Your Honor, that’s not admissible in court because that is an Out of Character opinion and failrp. Also I have a lot of grounds to sue and I intend to continue. Now please skip this nonsensical arguing and go into the discovery portion your Honor. We have a right to a speedy trial. MOVE YOUR ASS.

 

[Matthew100x]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS


royalsnakee
Plaintiff


V


IIKermitII
Defendant



1) 5.12: Opposing counsel doesn’t have a very significant standing, as when looking at the attached file, he is clearly suing to take my client's money. Opposing counsel even states "I live in LA. We don't need a reason." In regard to why he was suing.

ATTACHMENTS

Motion to dismiss is denied. An editable text log on its own is insufficient evidence. If you have collaborating evidence to prove the statements, you can submit it in a motion to reconsider.

 

[Matthew100x]

Objection Your Honor, that’s not admissible in court because that is an Out of Character opinion and failrp. Also I have a lot of grounds to sue and I intend to continue. Now please skip this nonsensical arguing and go into the discovery portion your Honor. We have a right to a speedy trial. MOVE YOUR ASS.

Consider this your one and only warning about cursing at me. We recently changed presiding judges due to the removal of Ko531 for reasons unrelated to this case. I am reviewing this case among others.

Next time you have an outburst like this I will be charging you with contempt of court under Rule 1.4 of the Court Rules and Procedures.

I will be moving this case to discovery, both sides will have 7 days to make submissions. Please remember the following:

Rule 4.2 (Submission Required For Use)​

All material used in legal arguments must have either been included in the case prior to the submission. Material must have been included within the complaint, within the answer, within an amendment to a complaint, within an amendment to an answer, or within a discovery submission. Otherwise the material will be deemed inadmissible and the argument can be voided by the presiding judge.

Rule 4.5 (Consent to End Discovery Early)​

If both parties consent to end Discovery early, they may request the presiding judge to move to the next phase of the trial.

Rule 4.9 (Witness Protocol)​

A party may submit a list for witnesses at any time before the end of discovery. In order for a witness to be called during witness testimony, they must be announced under this rule, during discovery. Any witness may be objected to according to the objections laid out within rule 6.3.

 

[royalsnakee]

I apologize your honor

 

[Towloo]

Motion to dismiss is denied. An editable text log on its own is insufficient evidence. If you have collaborating evidence to prove the statements, you can submit it in a motion to reconsider.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER


royalsnakee
Plaintiff


V


IIKermitII
Defendant


MOTION TO RECONSIDER

1. Your honor, there is a way to recover chat logs, and the screenshot previously provided shows the chat logs highlighted in the attached video. To be clear, these logs are not editable (you can try it for yourself if needed [if on a Macintosh]).

ATTACHMENTS

 

[royalsnakee]

Objection Your Honor this nonsensical video is inadmissible.

 

[royalsnakee]

Motion for summary judgement your honor. As I don’t think there’s any new evidence or witnesses and it would be a waste of time to prolong this any longer. What you see is what you get

 

[Towloo]

Objection Your Honor this nonsensical video is inadmissible.

This video is admissible as you specifically stated that I could provide collaborating evidence, and the video collaborates the fact that the logs were in fact not editable texts, but logs from the minecraft logs folder.

 

[Towloo]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER


royalsnakee
Plaintiff


V


IIKermitII
Defendant


MOTION TO RECONSIDER

1. Your honor, there is a way to recover chat logs, and the screenshot previously provided shows the chat logs highlighted in the attached video. To be clear, these logs are not editable (you can try it for yourself if needed [if on a Macintosh]).

ATTACHMENTS

Your honor, a good friend of mine (who has supporter in-game chat) has provided me with proof that the logs are legitimate. I would like to submit https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachme...8582845f61b13bea0fffaac4ca4a1c8222dfcfc120ca& into evidence.

 

[Matthew100x]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER


royalsnakee
Plaintiff


V


IIKermitII
Defendant


MOTION TO RECONSIDER

1. Your honor, there is a way to recover chat logs, and the screenshot previously provided shows the chat logs highlighted in the attached video. To be clear, these logs are not editable (you can try it for yourself if needed [if on a Macintosh]).

ATTACHMENTS

Denied. Just because a video of the evidence was taken does not mean it could not have been edited prior. These files are editable. You can open up a .Log file with TextEdit on Mac, edit the log file, and then save. I just did so on my MacBook to verify.

Perjury is "The act of giving knowingly incorrect testimony in Court" (see Act of Congress - Corruption and Espionage Offenses Act). It is an indictable offense. I am going to leave the situation as is because you may not have been aware that the text files are editable.

Going forward @Towloo, I am telling you now to please double check the truth of any statement that you make in Court, especially if you're going to try and use that statement in an argument to convince the court. I am saying this specifically to you because we are in District Court and you are representing someone, you need to be careful in any submission that can harm your client's case.

As a reminder, there is a little more then 24 hours left in Discovery.

There is a pending request for either summary judgment or trial by combat from the plaintiff. Can the Defendant please inform me their stance on the matter?

 

[Matthew100x]

I unfortunately did not see the new evidence because of the jump to the new page. This would have been legitimate cross-evidence verifying. This motion to dismiss is still being denied. In the future, please ask the court to amend your motion to reconsider.

 

[royalsnakee]

Your Honor Motion, For a Summary Judgement. As this is getting all over the place, Thank you so much for your time as for as sake of time can we please speed this up and do a summary judgement?

 

[Matthew100x]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT


royalsnakee
Plaintiff

V


IIKermitII
Defendant


ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

1. The defense disputes fact one because although both parties were guilty of harming one another, there is no proof to show my client started it
2. The defense affirms fact two, however, notes that it has nothing to do with my client
3. The defense disputes fact three because the plaintiff quite literally stated it was for money, and that there was no reason (The attached file).

DEFENSES

1. Although my client did in fact murder the plaintiff multiple times, in all cases, it was in self-defense, as the plaintiff remarks he was punished for murders (the murders of IIKermitII). Assaulting is enough to qualify for self-defense, and therefore my client’s murders were made in self-defense.
2. Opposing counsel is right about Serial Killings, however, as Anthony’s Amicus Brief shows, those are supposed to go through a DOJ ticket (which they weren’t). None of this matters, however, due to the fact that the crimes were committed in self-defense. Even if what the plaintiff said was true, he never used the command “/complaint” to make my client wanted, and therefore, didn’t want my client to be punished for them (likely so he had a stronger standing in court).
3. The evidence shown by opposing counsel only shows one rude remark by my client, who is remorseful about making it. Being repeatedly ganged up on by the plaintiff and acting in self-defense would make anyone say something to the offending party. Additionally, respect is a rule that staff would handle, so if the plaintiff wishes to take up the matter, he may make a staff ticket.

In order for their to be a summary judgment, both sides must agree to the facts and there must not be any factual dispute (see Guide - Motions Guide, quoted below).

This motion asks the judge to make a decision on the case without going to trial. Such a motion can only occur if none of the facts of the case are in dispute, thus all that needs to be decided is a final ruling on the case.

Currently there is a factual dispute on point one and point three. Does the defendant wish to amend their answer? They can still do so prior to the end of discovery.

 

[Matthew100x]

Given that we're outside of Discovery by several hours and the court has not heard a request to amend the answer, we will not be doing a summary judgment. The plaintiff now has 72 hours to post their opening statement.

 

[Towloo]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT


Your Honor,
Opposing counsel's claim is straightforward: they are pursuing monetary gain, not seeking redress for any genuine emotional harm. The plaintiff, royalsnakee, has failed to demonstrate any psychological trauma resulting from the events in question. In fact, evidence from the Discovery process reveals the plaintiff's cavalier attitude, even jesting about suing my client for financial gain. Such behavior does not align with someone genuinely suffering emotional distress but rather suggests opportunism.

Moreover, royalsnakee's request for $500 in legal fees lacks merit as he is representing himself. Legal fees are typically awarded to cover the expenses incurred by legal representation, not for self-representation. This further underscores the plaintiff's true motivation – financial gain.

As for the $2,500 in punitive damages sought by the plaintiff, such damages are intended to deter egregious behavior. However, in this case, both parties acknowledge their roles in the events leading to this dispute, making punitive damages unjustifiable. It is unfair to single out one party for civil punishment when both were complicit.

Furthermore, the plaintiff's assertion that only they were penalized for the alleged wrongdoing is misguided. Criminal offenses, such as murder, fall under the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice or Legal Affairs, not civil court. If the plaintiff believes my client should face criminal consequences, they should pursue appropriate legal channels, rather than seeking retribution in a civil case.

In summary, Your Honor, the plaintiff's claims lack merit and are driven by a desire for monetary gain rather than genuine harm. We urge the court to dismiss these baseless allegations and uphold the integrity of the legal system. Thank you.

 

[Towloo]

Denied. Just because a video of the evidence was taken does not mean it could not have been edited prior. These files are editable. You can open up a .Log file with TextEdit on Mac, edit the log file, and then save. I just did so on my MacBook to verify.

Perjury is "The act of giving knowingly incorrect testimony in Court" (see Act of Congress - Corruption and Espionage Offenses Act). It is an indictable offense. I am going to leave the situation as is because you may not have been aware that the text files are editable.

Going forward @Towloo, I am telling you now to please double check the truth of any statement that you make in Court, especially if you're going to try and use that statement in an argument to convince the court. I am saying this specifically to you because we are in District Court and you are representing someone, you need to be careful in any submission that can harm your client's case.

As a reminder, there is a little more then 24 hours left in Discovery.

There is a pending request for either summary judgment or trial by combat from the plaintiff. Can the Defendant please inform me their stance on the matter?

I want to start by stating that I am sincerely remorseful about the minecraft logs-I had no idea they were editable, as for me, they weren't (of course, I can't prove this). As for trial by combat and summary judgement, the defence will be rejecting both of these proposals. The trial by combat due to the fact that I would not be able to represent my client as a PVPer (my client is also legally inactive), and the summary judgement because I feel there are arguments to be made.

 

[Nacho]

I want to start by stating that I am sincerely remorseful about the minecraft logs-I had no idea they were editable, as for me, they weren't (of course, I can't prove this). As for trial by combat and summary judgement, the defence will be rejecting both of these proposals. The trial by combat due to the fact that I would not be able to represent my client as a PVPer (my client is also legally inactive), and the summary judgement because I feel there are arguments to be made.

Thank you - both proposals shall be denied.

The plaintiff missed the opportunity to file the Opening Statement, as previously indicated by the court. We will move on from their opening statement because of their clear lack of concern for the court's time. The plaintiff is charged with one count of contempt of court. The DOJ is ordered to charge accordingly.

The defense took it upon themselves to provide their opening statement. The defense is warned not to speak when they are not requested to do so. I will give both parties the opportunity to submit their witnesses to the court within 48 hours.

 

[Nacho]

Both sides did not submit any witnesses when given the opportunity to do so. We will be moving on to closing statements.

The plaintiff can submit their closing statements within the next 48 hours.

 

[Nacho]

Given that the Plaintiff failed to submit their closing statements within the allotted time, I hold them in contempt and direct the Department of Justice to charge them accordingly.

The Defendant may file this closing statement within 48 hours.

 

[Towloo]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CLOSING STATEMENT
Your Honor,

In closing, it is evident that the plaintiff's claims lack the substantive basis necessary to warrant consideration. Throughout this trial, it has become increasingly clear that the plaintiff's motivations are rooted not in a genuine pursuit of justice but rather in the pursuit of financial gain, as seen in the discovery submission. Despite attempts by opposing counsel to portray my client as the exclusive wrongdoer, the evidence presented fails to support such assertions. The plaintiff's failure to demonstrate enduring emotional distress, coupled with their flippant attitude towards litigation, undermines the credibility of their claims.

Moreover, the request for legal fees and punitive damages lacks merit. The plaintiff's decision to represent themselves renders the request for legal fees unfounded, as such fees are awarded to cover expenses incurred by legal representation. Additionally, punitive damages are unwarranted given the responsibility was shared by both parties in the events leading to this dispute.

Furthermore, the plaintiff's attempt to seek retribution for alleged criminal offenses through civil court is misguided. Matters such as murder fall under the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice or Legal Affairs, not civil litigation. This highlights a fundamental misunderstanding of legal processes and further underscores the opportunistic nature of the plaintiff's actions.

In conclusion, Your Honor, we urge the court to dismiss the plaintiff's baseless allegations and uphold the integrity of the legal system. Justice cannot be served through frivolous claims driven by financial motivations. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

 

[Nacho]

The court would like to thank both parties for their time, as with the filing of the last closing statement the court is ready to go into recess to begin drafting a verdict.

 

[Nacho]

Verdict

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
royalsnakee v. IIKermitII [2024] DCR 7

I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Defendant murdered them and threatened them further with death threats.
2. The DOJ must watch more inside the prison for crimes committed.

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. There is no proof to show that the defendant started the fight, although it affirms that violence was exchanged.
2. The DOJ's failure to watch the prison is not the defendant's fault.
3.. The Plaintiff admitted that this was for monetary purposes.

III. THE COURT OPINION
As highlighted in the amicus brief filed by Anthony, the crimes listed are supposed to be put in a DOJ ticket for further action. The plaintiff did not do this. The plaintiff seems to have sued for monetary gain instead of justice based on the fact that they did not report it in a DOJ ticket.

The plaintiff claims that the Defendant said, "I bitched you and get bitched, and I'm going to really kill you now" the Plaintiff only provided the chat logs of "[royaIsnakee] bitched this guy twice." The words said in chat do not constitute a threat; as defined in law, a Verbal Threat is "This is active...any forms of communication to put them in danger or prompt them to commit an action." In this chat log, we do not see anything suggesting that they were putting them in danger or prompting them to commit an action.

The Plaintiff has not proved that the defendant's actions have affected them negatively; no evidence was presented that they damaged their earnings or reputation.

The request for legal fees needs more merit as he is representing himself.

IV. DECISION
The District Court rules in favor of the Defendant.

The District Court thanks all involved.