- Joined
- May 10, 2022
- Messages
- 1,853
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Yeet_Boy (Helix Law Group representing)
Plaintiff
v.
Town of Oakridge and Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
The Defendants have improperly disqualified the Plaintiff from the May 2026 Oakridge Mayor election.
STATEMENT ON COURT JURISDICTION
Because this case disputes an election, it belongs in the Court of Disputed Returns, which according to the Redmontian Constitution, Part II, Section 20, Subsection 1, is the Supreme Court.
STATEMENT ON JOINDER OF DEFENDANTS
Because we allege the Oakridge Constitution illegally disqualifies Yeet_Boy from this election, the Town of Oakridge is a Defendant as the Town established this law.
Because we allege the Department of State failed to uphold the Redmontian Constitution over the Oakridge Constitution and illegally carried out the disqualification of Yeet_Boy from this election, the Commonwealth of Redmont is a Defendant.
I. PARTIES
1. Yeet_Boy (Plaintiff)
2. Town of Oakridge (Co-Defendant)
3. Commonwealth of Redmont (Co-Defendant)
II. FACTS
Note: All times are Central Time as that is my time zone.
1. On May 15, 2026 at 4:00pm, the Department of State opened declarations for the May 2026 Oakridge Mayor elections [Exhibit P-001].
2. On May 15, 2026 at 6:16pm, Yeet_Boy declared his candidacy for Mayor of Oakridge [Exhibit P-001].
3. On May 18, 2026 at 4:01pm, the Department of State announced the end of the declaration period and declared Yeet_Boy was disqualified for the following reason: “Candidate has served as Mayor during both the previous two Mayoral terms” [Exhibit P-001]
4. While the Oakridge Constitution states that one of the requirements to run for Mayor is “Has not served as Mayor during both the previous two Mayoral terms,” (Act of Council - New Constitution Act), the Redmontian Constitution states:
- “The Town Constitution and all Town bylaws must be consistent with this Constitution and federal law.” (Part IV, Section 32, Subsection 3 – emphasis added)
- “Town elections shall be free and fair, facilitated by Federal departments as provided by law. Towns may set reasonable candidacy and voting requirements consistent with Commonwealth law.” (Part IV, Section 33 – emphasis added)
- All citizens have the “right to participate in, and run for elected office, unless as punishment for a crime.” (Part V, Section 35, Subsection 1)
- “Every citizen is equal before and under the law” (Part V, Section 35, Subsection 13)
6. Yeet_Boy is a citizen of Redmont (common knowledge).
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Redmontian Constitution does not allow the disqualification of Mayoral candidates based on political history.
2. The Department of State failed to uphold the Redmontian Constitution in its disqualification of Yeet_Boy.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from Co-Defendant Town of Oakridge:
1. The New Constitution Act be struck as unconstitutional under the Redmontian Constitution
2. $12,000 in Legal Fees payable to the business HelixLaw or the player Dartanboy.
The Plaintiff seeks the following from Co-Defendant Commonwealth of Redmont:
1. The May 2026 Oakridge Mayoral Election be annulled and rerun
2. If the election cannot be annulled: $50,000 for Loss of Enjoyment (precedent: Lawsuit: Adjourned - Snowy_Heart v Commonwealth [2023] FCR 76)
3. A public apology letter from the Department of State in #government-announcements for failing to uphold the Constitution (precedent: Lawsuit: Adjourned - Snowy_Heart v Commonwealth [2023] FCR 76)
4. $15,000 in Legal Fees payable to the business HelixLaw or the player Dartanboy.
EVIDENCE
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 4th day of June 2026.
Consent to Represent: