Lawsuit: Pending The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154

BulletBark

Citizen
BulletBark
BulletBark
Solicitor
Joined
Aug 4, 2026
Messages
3

Case Filing​


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


The Forge
Plaintiff

v.

1. roy405
2. PhatCat2200
Defendants

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I was advertising my shop, where I sell bulletproof armor. The plaintiff said he wanted to test it out. We met, i put on the armor. Then he started shooting me with a crossbow, which fires bolts. Not bullets. My armor is advertised and sold specifically as bulletproof. It makes no claims regarding resistance to bolts, arrows, explosives or any other projectile type. it just wasn't tested against the right kind of weapon. When the bolt dealt damage, he started telling people my shop was a scam, even though nothing I advertised was false.


I. PARTIES
1. frodo1005 (CEO - The Forge)
.august4496 (Marketing coordinator - The Forge)


2. roy405
PhatCat2200

II. FACTS
1. frodo1005 posted an advertisement about bulletproof armor
2. roy405 said "lets test that", and proceded to use crossbow (Exhibit 1)
3. After the plaintiff ran away beacuse he didn't want to die, he called it to be a scam (Exhibit 2, 3)
4. In a few minutes the ad poped up again and he again said "frodo1005 is scamming yall, dont buy his "bulletproof armor"" (Exhibit 4)
5. Later the ad popped up once again, and then another ad posted my PhatCat2200 "frodo1005 is a scammer" (Exhibit 5)
6. After being asked by a player Nooneee0 (potential buyer) (Exhibit 5) "how so?" got an answer from PhatCat2200 "its fake, don't buy it" Which most definetly Interfered with the sales. this happened a little while again (no proof) Which again safe to say, impacted the reputation of the seller and made him seem untrustworthy


III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. False accusation (CCA part III section 5) - The defendant falsly accuses the plaintiff of selling fake bulletproof armour, with invalid proof
2. Defamation (Civil CA part V section 1) - roy405 makes a statement in chat saying "don't buy it, its a scam"
3 Libel (Civil CA part V section 2) - PhatCat2200 makes an advertisment calling the plaintiff a scammer after the plaintiff posted another ad promoting the product
4 Slander (Civil CA part V section 3) - The defendant falsly accuses the plaintiff of selling fake bulletproof armour, with flase and
misleading accusations

V. Evidence
Exhibit 1
1786213961768.png

Exhibit 2
photo_1_2026-08-08_21-11-44.png

Exhibit 3
photo_2_2026-08-08_21-11-44.png

Exhibit 4
photo_3_2026-08-08_21-11-44.png

Exhibit 5
photo_4_2026-08-08_21-11-44.png

Exhibit 6
photo_5_2026-08-08_21-11-44.png

Exhibit 7
photo_6_2026-08-08_21-11-44.png


IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $7000 in compensatory fees
2. Any further remedy the court deems just and proper.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: 07.08.2026
 
Last edited:

Writ of Summons


@roy405 and @PhatCat2200 are required to appear before the District Court in the case of The Forge v. roy405 & PhatCat2200

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
Defendant PhatCat2200 was sent a mail with summons to this case
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2026-08-30-09-30-07-115_org.angelauramc.amethyst.debug.png
    Screenshot_2026-08-30-09-30-07-115_org.angelauramc.amethyst.debug.png
    12.1 KB · Views: 11

Case Filing​


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


The Forge
Plaintiff

v.

1. roy405
2. PhatCat2200
Defendants

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I was advertising my shop, where I sell bulletproof armor. The plaintiff said he wanted to test it out. We met, i put on the armor. Then he started shooting me with a crossbow, which fires bolts. Not bullets. My armor is advertised and sold specifically as bulletproof. It makes no claims regarding resistance to bolts, arrows, explosives or any other projectile type. it just wasn't tested against the right kind of weapon. When the bolt dealt damage, he started telling people my shop was a scam, even though nothing I advertised was false.


I. PARTIES
1. frodo1005 (CEO - The Forge)
.august4496 (Marketing coordinator - The Forge)


2. roy405
PhatCat2200

II. FACTS
1. frodo1005 posted an advertisement about bulletproof armor
2. roy405 said "lets test that", and proceded to use crossbow (Exhibit 1)
3. After the plaintiff ran away beacuse he didn't want to die, he called it to be a scam (Exhibit 2, 3)
4. In a few minutes the ad poped up again and he again said "frodo1005 is scamming yall, dont buy his "bulletproof armor"" (Exhibit 4)
5. Later the ad popped up once again, and then another ad posted my PhatCat2200 "frodo1005 is a scammer" (Exhibit 5)
6. After being asked by a player Nooneee0 (potential buyer) (Exhibit 5) "how so?" got an answer from PhatCat2200 "its fake, don't buy it" Which most definetly Interfered with the sales. this happened a little while again (no proof) Which again safe to say, impacted the reputation of the seller and made him seem untrustworthy


III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. False accusation (CCA part III section 5) - The defendant falsly accuses the plaintiff of selling fake bulletproof armour, with invalid proof
2. Defamation (Civil CA part V section 1) - roy405 makes a statement in chat saying "don't buy it, its a scam"
3 Libel (Civil CA part V section 2) - PhatCat2200 makes an advertisment calling the plaintiff a scammer after the plaintiff posted another ad promoting the product
4 Slander (Civil CA part V section 3) - The defendant falsly accuses the plaintiff of selling fake bulletproof armour, with flase and
misleading accusations

V. Evidence
Exhibit 1View attachment 94086
Exhibit 2View attachment 94079
Exhibit 3View attachment 94080
Exhibit 4View attachment 94081
Exhibit 5View attachment 94082
Exhibit 6View attachment 94083
Exhibit 7View attachment 94084

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $7000 in compensatory fees
2. Any further remedy the court deems just and proper.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: 07.08.2026

Counsel, please provide proof of representation within 48 hours.
 
I frodo1005 accept BulletBark to represent me in the case of The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200
 
@Poker Your Honor, I am requesting a 24 hour extension to write the answer to complaint because I have to write a separate answer to complaint and I have a few tests I have to study for IRL. I will likely post it before the extension, however I am requesting it just in case I need it. @roy404 and I are the Counsel for the Defendant.


1788113325461.png

1788113365784.png
 
@Poker Your Honor, I am requesting a 24 hour extension to write the answer to complaint because I have to write a separate answer to complaint and I have a few tests I have to study for IRL. I will likely post it before the extension, however I am requesting it just in case I need it. @roy404 and I are the Counsel for the Defendant.



Granted

New deadline is 02, September, 2026, 12:46 UTC.
 
Back
Top