Lawsuit: Pending SimplifiedMax v. L4ndaakk [2026] DCR 28

Capt11543

Capt11543

Citizen
Joined
May 16, 2025
Messages
5

Case Filing


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


SimplifiedMax
Plaintiff

v.

L4ndaakk
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

This is a straightforward breach of contract case. My client, SimplifiedMax, entered into a contract with the defendant wherein he agreed $10,000 for a gold drill that he never received. We are seeking damages and a specific performance order.
Click to expand...

I. PARTIES
  1. SimplifiedMax, Plaintiff
  2. L4ndaakk, Defendant

II. FACTS
  1. On February 24, 2026, Plaintiff agreed to pay Defendant $10,000 in exchange for a gold drill. See P-001.
  2. During their conversation, Plaintiff sent Defendant the promised $10,000 payment. See P-002.
  3. Defendant then sent Plaintiff a package through the in-game parcel service, leading Plaintiff to believe he had sent the drill as promised. See P-003.
  4. The parcel Defendant sent actually contained a single potato.
  5. To date, Plaintiff has not received a gold drill from Defendant.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
  1. The agreement between Plaintiff and Defendant to exchange $10,000 for a gold drill constitutes a contract. See Contracts Act §4.
  2. Plaintiff upheld their obligation by paying the $10,000. Defendant failed to uphold their obligation by delivering a potato instead of a gold drill. Therefore, Defendant breached the contract. See Contracts Act §7.
  3. Plaintiff suffered direct financial losses because Defendant failed to deliver the product as promised, even after Plaintiff sent the $10,000 payment. Plaintiff did not receive the item they agreed to purchase for that price.
  4. Because the contract involved the sale of a good, Defendant committed the specific civil violation of Failure to Deliver Goods. See Redmont Civil Code Act, Part VI, §4.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Pursuant to Redmont Civil Code Act, Part VI, §4, Plaintiff is seeking the following relief from Defendant:
  1. Monetary damages of $20,000 (200 Civil Penalty Units).
  2. A specific performance order to uphold their obligation and deliver the gold drill. If Defendant does not have a gold drill, Plaintiff seeks a written apology from Defendant instead.

V. EVIDENCE
P-001-1.png

P-001-2.png

P-001-3.png
P-002.png
P-003.png

VI. OATH
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 6th day of March 2026

 
Last edited:

Writ of Summons

@L4ndaakk, is required to appear before the District Court in the case of SimplifiedMax v. L4ndaakk [2026] DCR 28

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

Your Honor, it has been over 72 hours since the Defendant was summoned to this case. Since the Defendant has not appeared, this Court should grant default judgement in this case.

DATED: This 19th day of March, 2026

 
Hopping in here as new presiding officer.

Capt11543 said:

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

Your Honor, it has been over 72 hours since the Defendant was summoned to this case. Since the Defendant has not appeared, this Court should grant default judgement in this case.

DATED: This 19th day of March, 2026

Click to expand...
Denied. A public defender will be appointed. (CC: @Smallfries )
 

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
Your Honor, the Defense counsel has reached out to us to begin settlement talks, which we have been happy to oblige. However, my client's involvement in these negotiations is directly required at this point, and my client happens to be on vacation and completely unreachable at this time.

Plaintiff's Counsel would hate to see otherwise productive settlement talks scuttled by hard procedural deadlines, nor do we want the Defense Counsel to be punished for a late filing when they reached out in good faith to negotiate a settlement and the delay is on our side.

My client is scheduled to return on April 1 and would then be available to participate in the settlement negotiations.

We therefore respectfully move that this Court:

  • Stay the proceedings until the Plaintiff returns from vacation, and can participate in settlement negotiations; and
  • Grant the Defense a 31-hour extension on any filing deadlines they are facing in this case.

 
Capt11543 said:

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
Your Honor, the Defense counsel has reached out to us to begin settlement talks, which we have been happy to oblige. However, my client's involvement in these negotiations is directly required at this point, and my client happens to be on vacation and completely unreachable at this time.

Plaintiff's Counsel would hate to see otherwise productive settlement talks scuttled by hard procedural deadlines, nor do we want the Defense Counsel to be punished for a late filing when they reached out in good faith to negotiate a settlement and the delay is on our side.

My client is scheduled to return on April 1 and would then be available to participate in the settlement negotiations.

We therefore respectfully move that this Court:

  • Stay the proceedings until the Plaintiff returns from vacation, and can participate in settlement negotiations; and
  • Grant the Defense a 31-hour extension on any filing deadlines they are facing in this case.

Click to expand...
Motions for continuance aren’t really a thing in Redmont; you can just ask respectfully for an extension. The Court therefore just will treat this as an extension request rather than a formal motion.

On the extension request; the extension would be to a deadline of the defense, so I don’t see any reason to approve unless the Defense were to ask for one/confirm that they want this—plaintiff is not prejudiced by defendant timely providing an answer to complaint.

@gribble19 Has the defense agreed to seek this extension, or does the Defense prefer the original deadline?
 

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

SimplifiedMax
Plaintiff

v.

L4ndaakk
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The Defendant AFFIRMS that on February 24, 2026, Plaintiff agreed to pay Defendant $10,000 in exchange for a gold drill.
2. The Defendant AFFIRMS that during their conversation, Plaintiff sent Defendant the promised $10,000 payment.
3. The Defendant AFFIRMS that defendant then sent Plaintiff a package through the in-game parcel service. The Defendant NEITHER AFFIRMS NOR DENIES whether this led Plaintiff to believe he had sent the drill as promised.
4. The Defendant DENIES that the parcel Defendant sent actually contained a single potato.
5. The Defendant DENIES that to date, Plaintiff has not received a gold drill from Defendant.

II. DEFENCES
1. The Judicial Standards Act in Part II, §3.1.a states that the Balance of Probabilities is the standard of proof that is required in civil proceedings.
2. There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the Defendant sent a potato instead of a gold drill on a balance of probabilities.
3. There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the Defendant has not received a gold drill from the Defendant on a balance of probabilities.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This twenty-ninth day of March 2026.

 
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
DISCOVERY SUBMISSION

Your Honor, the Plaintiff submits evidence of his last login time.

1774827794790.png

Respectfully submitted,
Capt B. Numbers
Plaintiff's Counsel
 
I am currently in Mexico and have no access to any device, I am currently using my dad’s phone. I will retry in 2 days.
 
SimplifiedMax said:
I am currently in Mexico and have no access to any device, I am currently using my dad’s phone. I will retry in 2 days.
Click to expand...
Is there anything you’d like to ask of the Court in this filing? (CC: @Capt11543 )
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top