Appeal: Pending In re [2026] FCR 65 | [2026] SCR 23

[Dartanboy]

Client and Counsel Name: Dartanboy

I am representing myself

Appealed Case Name & Style: [2026] FCR 65

Were you originally the plaintiff or defendant: Plaintiff

Reason for Appeal: The Federal Court made one error of fact and one error of law:

(Error of Fact)
1. The Court incorrectly decided that "JO" must mean "Judicial Officer."

Other well-known meanings of "JO" include the country code for the foreign nation of Jordan, an abbreviation for "Job Offer", and abbreviation for "Junior Olympics." It is also in the lyrics of Nicki Minaj's famous song "Tusa" (KAROL G & Nicki Minaj – Tusa). To determine that it must mean "Judicial Officer" is simply unjust.

(Error of Law)
2. The court found that "Breaching of the JO" means "a violation of Part II Section 21 of the Constitution."

This is a blatant misreading of the Article of Impeachment.

In no way was there any specification in the Article of Impeachment what Constitutional Provisions were allegedly violated. The impeachment stated only "to impeach Dartanboy from his position of Federal Judge due to breaches of the JO."

"Breaches of the JO" is far too vague, even if we do pretend that "JO" must exclusively mean "Judicial Officer." What provision was allegedly violated? How was it specified? If it is (somehow) Part II Section 21 that was alleged in the Impeachment, which provision within that entire section was allegedly violated?

Such specification is required by Constitution Part VIII Section 48.

Are you requesting oral arguments? No, I have too much happening IRL at the moment.

Additional Evidence/Information: Constitution Part VIII Section 48:

48. Impeachment
Impeachment is a constitutional remedy to address serious constitutional offenses.

(1) The House will lay charges against an official or an ex-official, specifying what constitutional provisions were violated.

(2) Any impeached official or ex-official will be subject to a trial that will be conducted by the Senate. If found guilty of any alleged constitutional offence by the Senate, the official or ex-official in question may be subject to:

(a) Immediate removal from office.

(b) Ban from elected office for a period of no longer than 2 months.

(c) Ban from judicial office for a period of no longer than 2 months.

(d) Ban from executive office for a period of no longer than 2 months.

 

[Muggy21]

@Dartanboy

As per for the Appeal Format, you must indicate whether or not you seek oral argument.

 

[Dartanboy]

@Dartanboy

As per for the Appeal Format, you must indicate whether or not you seek oral argument.

My apologies, your honor.

I suppose yes, I seek oral argument. Unless this must take place in VC or in-game (I'm currently dealing with a lot IRL). Then no. It's not perfectly clear what this means. It is not defined in the appeal format post.

 

[Smallfries]

My apologies, your honor.

I suppose yes, I seek oral argument. Unless this must take place in VC or in-game (I'm currently dealing with a lot IRL). Then no. It's not perfectly clear what this means. It is not defined in the appeal format post.

Oral means in a VC, and typically in-game. Everything not done in a VC is textual, not oral. I understand that the click-to-appeal button is not up to date, but please update your initial filing to the listed format.

 

[Dartanboy]

Oral means in a VC, and typically in-game. Everything not done in a VC is textual, not oral. I understand that the click-to-appeal button is not up to date, but please update your initial filing to the listed format.

I have changed the OP as requested.

 

[Muggy21]

I'll be the presiding officer in this matter.

The Supreme Court grants review to this appeal. The Attorney General shall be summoned to represent the Appellee.

@Dartanboy Do you wish to make an Appellate Brief beyond your original submission?