Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This bill has been granted Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
I am largely not a fan of acts being named after private businesses. I think that is improper and unprofessional at best. However, I have been given assurances that there is an Act of Congress in the works that will prohibit Acts named after private entities, and have no issue with the contents of this Act. I pray for all of your souls that such an act passes.
This bill has been granted Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
This bill is the natural complement to the Redmont Civil Code Act (RCCA), under which these torts and crimes were moved into codified torts or civil administrative offenses. Just as the RCCA was signed into law, this bill too is granted Presidential Assent and is signed into law.
It has been raised to my attention that this bill would prohibit the hospital's traditional self-serve chestshops, which have been removed in anticipation of this bill's signing. I do not support this. For people who play when there are not doctors online, these chestshops are essential.
Prohibiting people from self-administering class A treatments is detrimental in times of low activity. We must have some way to ensure that players get healthcare in the overnight U.S./morning EU hours. And we just don't have enough doctors to consistently ensure that. Nobody should be condemned to hours of ticking damage.
If a bill like this is to be passed, it must account for the fact that doctors might not always be online, and that people need some way to get medical treatment at those times. This bill fails to do so, and indeed criminalizes it.
Therefore, I veto this bill.
In general, I approve of most changes in this bill.
I have some lingering concerns regarding the charges of Abuse of Power, as the charge of Corruption it replaces was fundamentally about preventing self-dealing (or, as the law put it, using government to gain "an unfair advantage for oneself or another"). This change will certainly burden the executive, but the presence of the good-faith mistake defense is enough to get me to not veto, despite the law being broader than I'd like.
That being said, the recognition of defenses and general improvements, plus the strong signal that the Congress wants to ensure more strictly that the executive acts lawfully and respects individual rights, are worthy enough ot overcome my displeasure with implementation of a part of this.
As such, this bill is granted Presidential Assent and is signed into law.
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: As Representative Angryhamdog put it best -
While it is illegal to kill pets, it is not illegal to attack them. This should be rectified.
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: This Bill creates a new offence for entities that do not comply with lawful requests to conduct spot-checks to check if gambling machines correctly reflect their advertised odds, strengthening Redmontians' right to be confident the odds advertised to them are not misleading them.
Technofied
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: This Bill creates a new offence for detectives abusing their position to destroy evidence of murders, or engage in a conflict of interest by taking cases they are a party to, which could be used to destroy evidence or avoid murderers being caught.
Technofied
Why is there a large gap here.PART I — PRELIMINARIES
1. Short Title and Enactment
(1) This Act may be cited as the ‘Agent 47 Act.’
Section 4 with no Section 3?4. Amendments
Why is this going in Part VII Corporate Offences, when it would be better off in Part IV Dangers to the Community alongside the other violence offences.(1) Part VII of the Criminal Code Act is hereby amended to include the following offence:
25 - Contract Murder
Offence Type: Indictable
Penalty:
(a) First offence: Up to 100 Penalty Units; Up to 30 minutes imprisonment
(b) Subsequent offences: Up to 200 Penalty Units; Up to 45 minutes imprisonment
A person commits an offence if the person:
(a) Gives or receives money, assets, or another item of value in exchange for the murder of another citizen.
(i) Unless expressed in the form of the in-game bounty system.
(b) This offence overrides Incitement and Accessory to a Crime.
Relevant Law:
If you want this, then you would state that "This offence shall not occur where"(i) Unless expressed in the form of the in-game bounty system.
It's all right there for you.(#) Offence Name
Offence Type: Indictable/Summary
Penalty: Various options.
(a) Up to x amount of imprisonment or penalty units
(b) x amount of imprisonment or penalty units or disqualification period
(c) First, Second, Subsequent offence list
(d) All separated by a semi-colon.
A person commits an offence if the person:
(a) establish the legal test for your offence
It is a defence to a charge under this section if the person:
(a) establish the legal test for your defence
This offence shall not occur where:
(a) establish the legal test where it is not an offence
This isn't how you structure multiple penalties.Penalty:First offence: Up to 100 Penalty Units; Up to 30 minutes imprisonment
Subsequent offences: Up to 200 Penalty Units; Up to 45 minutes imprisonment
Penalty:
(a) First offence - Up to 100 Penalty Units; Up to 30 minutes imprisonment
(b) Subsequent offences - Up to 200 Penalty Units; Up to 45 minutes imprisonment
Why is this all bold?PART III — Transition Period
(1) Any businesses or individuals offering Contract Murder services are hereby granted, upon the signage of this act, a 7-day grace period to be disbanded or cancel any actions that would interfere with Section 25, Part VII of the Criminal Code Act.
(i) All customers must be informed of this before the deadline and paid back in full.
I believe I have fixed all of your suggestions. Thank you!Why is there a large gap here.
Section 4 with no Section 3?
Why is this going in Part VII Corporate Offences, when it would be better off in Part IV Dangers to the Community alongside the other violence offences.
If you want this, then you would state that "This offence shall not occur where"
It's all right there for you.
This isn't how you structure multiple penalties.
This is:
Why is this all bold?
NopeI believe I have fixed all of your suggestions. Thank you!
This should be this:A person commits an offence if the person:
(a) Gives or receives money, assets, positions of power, or another item of value in exchange for the murder of another citizen.
(i) This offence shall not occur where the form of the in-game bounty system is used with no other communication methods.
(b) This offence overrides Incitement and Accessory to a Crime.
A person commits an offence if the person:
(a) gives or receives money, assets, positions of power, or another item of value in exchange for the murder of another citizen.
This offence shall not occur where:
(b) the form of the in-game bounty system is used with no other communication methods.
(c) this offence overrides Incitement and Accessory to a Crime.
(a) First offence- Up to 100 Penalty Units; Up to 30 minutes imprisonment
(b) Subsequent offences- Up to 200 Penalty Units; Up to 45 minutes imprisonment
Still not Section 3?4. Amendments
Make this a lowercase "g"(a) Gives
This a lowercase "t"(c) This
Is it to your liking now? I apologize since this is my first bill everMake this a lowercase "g"
And
This a lowercase "t"
And I will be satisfied.
Thank you for putting in the effort to correct minor things. It might seem tedious, but it goes a long way in keeping everything uniform and up to standards.Is it to your liking now? I apologize since this is my first bill ever
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: This Bill extends protections against threats or harm afforded to law enforcement officers to all government employees, in the course of exercising their lawful duties.
Technofied
| Taxation Type | Taxation Rate |
| Financial Institution Tax | 10% |
| Financial Institution Depositor Insurance Tax | 10% |
| Total | 20% of Profits |
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: This Bill makes murder-for-hire illegal with a severe punishment, with the only exemption of the in-game bounty system when solely used.
Technofied
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: This Bill introduces harsher penalties for committing individual murders as well as mass murders. Noting Redmont has faced an influx of murders in the past few months, along with the punishment for single murders remaining relatively stable over the years, I believe it is fitting to increase the punishment for the crime.
I understand there are concerns expressed by Senator zlost and others that this may deter new players, however the increases proposed are modest and can easily be recovered, through voting or participating in our economy. New players that mass murder will likely have a harder time, however it is my opinion that such steep punishment should serve as a deterrent for the future.
Technofied
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: This Bill introduces harsher penalties for committing individual murders as well as mass murders. Noting Redmont has faced an influx of murders in the past few months, along with the punishment for single murders remaining relatively stable over the years, I believe it is fitting to increase the punishment for the crime.
I understand there are concerns expressed by Senator zlost and others that this may deter new players, however the increases proposed are modest and can easily be recovered, through voting or participating in our economy. New players that mass murder will likely have a harder time, however it is my opinion that such steep punishment should serve as a deterrent for the future.
Technofied
Did you perhaps reach out to me to ask me to change or motion to amend this? If there is a problem with my wording, I am free to work with you on it.Feedback
I don't like this verbiage:
(i) to have this offence be proven, a government employee must use the /inspect command to ensure no edits had occurred afterwards.
This is implied also, and should be dept policy when charging. We shouldnt be micromanaging to this level in law.
--
I don't like this verbiage:
(a) enters an area that has been restricted to public access via a no trespassing sign, book, or another form of communication visible from every entrance.
There needs to be reason here. i.e.
(a) enters an area that clearly and reasonably communicates that it is restricted from public access.
--
This is a silly double up of trespassing. I don't think it needs to be greater than normal - they havent even entered the vault yet lol.
(4) Part VIII of the Criminal Code Act shall be amended by adding the following violation, and the offences shall be renumerated accordingly:
7 - Bank Trespass
Offence Type: Summary
Penalty: 15 Penalty Units; 5 minutes imprisonment
A person commits an offence if the person:
(a) trespasses behind the 'No Trespassing' sign in the bank
Relevant Law:
Did you perhaps reach out to me to ask me to change or motion to amend this? If there is a problem with my wording, I am free to work with you on it.
This bill has been passed into law as per Section 24(3) of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Redmont.
Reason: This Bill is assumed to have been given assent, as per Section 24(3) of the Constitution.
The President has the authority to assent to or veto legislation passed by Congress within 14 days before assent is assumed and the bill passes into law.
This bill has been passed into law. As per Section 24(3) of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Redmont.
Reason: This Bill is assumed to have been given assent, as per Section 24(3) of the Constitution.
The President has the authority to assent to or veto legislation passed by Congress within 14 days before assent is assumed and the bill passes into law.
This bill has been passed into law. As per Section 24(3) of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Redmont.
Reason: This Bill is assumed to have been given assent, as per Section 24(3) of the Constitution.
The President has the authority to assent to or veto legislation passed by Congress within 14 days before assent is assumed and the bill passes into law.
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: This Bill legalises bounties made through the Bounty Hunters plugin, which was already the case prior to the Agent 47 Act.
Technofied
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: This Bill legalises bounties made through the Bounty Hunters plugin, which was already the case prior to the Agent 47 Act.
Technofied
This bill has been passed into law. As per Section 24(3) of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Redmont.
Reason: This Bill is assumed to have been given assent, as per Section 24(3) of the Constitution.
The President has the authority to assent to or veto legislation passed by Congress within 14 days before assent is assumed and the bill passes into law.
This bill has been passed into law. As per Section 24(3) of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Redmont.
Reason: This Bill is assumed to have been given assent, as per Section 24(3) of the Constitution.
The President has the authority to assent to or veto legislation passed by Congress within 14 days before assent is assumed and the bill passes into law.
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: This Bill removes the now disbanded Armed Forces of the Commonwealth of Redmont from the Firearms Licensing Act and Redmont Criminal Code.
Technofied
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: This Bill makes certain classes of buffs illegal and introduces criminal offences for possession, trafficking, production, and buffing other players. It is in the server's best interests that such form of crimes be legislated, as it enhances the criminal roleplay scene.
Technofied
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: This Bill criminalises abandoning animals on both public and private lands, where there is either:
| Taxation Bracket | Taxation Rate (%) |
| $0.00 to $99,999.99 | 0 |
| $0.00 to $49,999.99 | 0 |
| $50,000.00 to $99,999.99 | 1 |
| $100,000.00 to $199,999.99 | 1 1.2 |
| $200,000.00 to $299,999.99 | 1.2 1.4 |
| $300,000.00 - $499,999.99 | 1.4 2.0 |
| $500,000.00+ | 1.6 3.0 |
| Amount of plots owned by winning bidder (Both numbers inclusive, but not inclusive of the plot won) | Tax (as a % of bid offer) |
| 0-9 | 0% |
| 1-4 | 5% |
| 5-9 | 10% |
| 10-14 | 25% |
| 15-20 | 50% |
| 20 21+ | 75% |
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: This Bill replaces the temporary Bankruptcy Band-Aid Act with a permanent bankruptcy framework.
This new framework establishes clear procedures for personal bankruptcy and business insolvency, creditor priority rules, trustee accountability, and workers’ wage recovery.
Technofied
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: The Criminal Code Act banned advertising illicit items directly, but not the businesses selling them.
This Bill closes that loophole by extending the Illegal Advertising offence to any business predominantly engaged in illicit trade, while preserving the Black Market exception.
Technofied
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: This Bill legalises leaving or voluntarily dissolving a union under the Union Busting offence in the Criminal Code Act, which solves the problem of that offence being worded broadly enough to criminalise both actions.
Technofied
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: This Bill raises the insider trading penalty to up to 500 Penalty Units, 60 minutes imprisonment, and a 2-month suspension of trading privileges, acting as a further deterrent to what is arguably one of the most reprehensible self serving white collar crimes there is.
Insider trading has no place in Redmont society.
Technofied
The Commonwealth is facing a fiscal cliff at the moment. While there are portions of this bill that I find may be a bit much (I don't think we need to have auction levies for people with 1 plot, and changing Criminal penalty units without changing civil penalty units is likely to cause confusion), the bill on balance will raise revenues in a moderate manner. Its benefits outweight its costs, and I trust that the Congress will tweak this as we get more feedback on the revenue this will raise for the Commonwealth.
This bill is granted assent and is signed into law.
This act does two things: (1) codifies the advertising of illegal goods and services as a summary offense; and (2) restores a black market exemption into law.
The first is more a change in enforcement practice than it is a change in whether an underlying act is illegal. At present, advertising of unlawful services or goods is a prima facie case for conspiracy to do that illegal thing. (See: Inknet v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 86, setting a standard for intent required for conviction of conspiracy as including an overt act towards a crime: that is, “that a Defendant’s conduct and/or action in a situation furthered, attempted to carry out, or was in the process of committing a crime”). Practically, however, this is not enforced. Charging conspiracy takes up substantial resources, both in the judiciary and in the Department of Justice. Both of these groups are overburdened by work as our server has so rapidly grown, and this has required certain prosecutions and cases to be prioritized. The judiciary cannot handle, nor can the DOJ prosecute, the large volume of crimes that already occur under the existing statute.
By moving this to a summary offense, the Department of Homeland Security becomes tasked with initial enforcement regarding the advertising of illegal goods and services. This is a much quicker and less administratively burdensome process for all involved. This saves judicial resources, makes prosecutions easier, and ultimately provides additional deterrence to unlawful operations.
As with all summary offenses, this moves the fine out of a trial and into something more akin to a traffic ticket. Contesting the charge begins in a DHS ticket, and one can still choose to contest in the District or Federal Court should they wish. And the punishment for illegal advertising in one instance is not so severe as to unduly burden rights in this regard.
For this reason, shifting from an indictable to summary offense in this regard is justified. The Department of Homeland Security, as is with all summary offenses, ought act conservatively in its prosecution practices; the point of summary offenses (outside of those issued by a judge, like contempt) is, after all, to quickly deal with offenses that are objective or obvious in nature.
Moving to the second operative item, the black market exception, the central point of the black market plots are to have this kind of trade as a form of roleplay. While it is indeed a bit odd to incorporate that into open advertising (black markets are not typically openly advertised to the whole world), the exception makes enough sense in the context of this Minecraft server’s material conditions; it is much better to have this in law than to try to divine staff intent every time some thing involving a black market comes up. Merely because it provides legal clarity as to the legality of the advertising of black market services, I believe the addition of the exemption is a net benefit, irrespective of the actual content of that policy choice.
As such, I grant assent to this bill. It is hereby signed into law.