Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This bill has been granted Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
I am largely not a fan of acts being named after private businesses. I think that is improper and unprofessional at best. However, I have been given assurances that there is an Act of Congress in the works that will prohibit Acts named after private entities, and have no issue with the contents of this Act. I pray for all of your souls that such an act passes.
This bill has been granted Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
It has been raised to my attention that this bill would prohibit the hospital's traditional self-serve chestshops, which have been removed in anticipation of this bill's signing. I do not support this. For people who play when there are not doctors online, these chestshops are essential.
Prohibiting people from self-administering class A treatments is detrimental in times of low activity. We must have some way to ensure that players get healthcare in the overnight U.S./morning EU hours. And we just don't have enough doctors to consistently ensure that. Nobody should be condemned to hours of ticking damage.
If a bill like this is to be passed, it must account for the fact that doctors might not always be online, and that people need some way to get medical treatment at those times. This bill fails to do so, and indeed criminalizes it.
Therefore, I veto this bill.
In general, I approve of most changes in this bill.
I have some lingering concerns regarding the charges of Abuse of Power, as the charge of Corruption it replaces was fundamentally about preventing self-dealing (or, as the law put it, using government to gain "an unfair advantage for oneself or another"). This change will certainly burden the executive, but the presence of the good-faith mistake defense is enough to get me to not veto, despite the law being broader than I'd like.
That being said, the recognition of defenses and general improvements, plus the strong signal that the Congress wants to ensure more strictly that the executive acts lawfully and respects individual rights, are worthy enough ot overcome my displeasure with implementation of a part of this.
As such, this bill is granted Presidential Assent and is signed into law.
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: As Representative Angryhamdog put it best -
While it is illegal to kill pets, it is not illegal to attack them. This should be rectified.
This bill has received Presidential assent and is hereby signed into law.
Reason: This Bill creates a new offence for entities that do not comply with lawful requests to conduct spot-checks to check if gambling machines correctly reflect their advertised odds, strengthening Redmontians' right to be confident the odds advertised to them are not misleading them.
Technofied