Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. xEndeavour [2026] SCR 21

DETECTIVHOLMES

Moderator
Moderator
Solicitor General
Supporter
Homeland Security Department
Education Department
Justice Department
Health Department
DETECTIVHOLMES
DETECTIVHOLMES
Solicitor General
Joined
Jan 28, 2023
Messages
86

Case Filing


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION


The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

xEndeavour
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

PROSECUTING AUTHORITY REPORT
xEndeavour has repeatedly committed high crimes such as treason and severe crimes such as extortion, involuntary servitude, abuse of power, amongst others. This is not the first time charges like these are laid upon the defendant. It is important for the court of decide the fate of this case taking into consideration previous convictions.

I. PARTIES
1. The Commonwealth of Redmont (Prosecution)
2. xEndeavour (Defendant)
3. Scassany Contour
4. mesemi
5. Eeeenor

II. FACTS
1. xEndeavour used his privileges to remove an article about the 6/7 protests.
2. xEndeavour Extorted members of the MCN with a statement “If the instability keeps up then the server will just close”.
3. xEndeavour committed treason by removing the protest wiki page, an action which was predicted to cause political instability; several government departments have shut down due to this.
4. xEndeavour threatened staff members to process orders which were conflicting.
5. xEndeavour disrupted DOE operations by deleting one of their pages on the Wiki.
6. xEndeavour tried to incite staff members to cause further obstruction to the DOE by constantly redeleting the page.


III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. Extortion under the Criminal Code Act. The Defense willingly extorted the entirety of the Network Staff Team, threatening “If the instability keeps up then the server will just close”.
2. Treason under the Criminal Code Act. The Defense willingly disrupted the workflow and stability of the Commonwealth, causing a government shutdown that affected all government entities.
3. Involuntary Servitude under the Criminal Code Act, Under threats, forced staff members to process orders that conflicted with their moral standing
4. Abuse of Power under the Criminal Code Act, removed a troubling wiki article about themself from the Wiki using their powers, without prior authorization.
5. Obstruction of Government Department under the Criminal Code Act, Without permission from the DOE, Modified a wiki page under their jurisdiction, causing internal conflict.
6.Incitement under the Criminal Code Act, Tried to incite members of the MCN to delete the wiki page, which would be obstruction to the DOE’s services.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
Due to the history and severity of the defendant’s actions, The Commonwealth would request the MAXIMUM penalty for above charges. Which would be:
1. 1000 penalty units and 120 minutes imprisonment for extorsion
2. 500 penalty units and 2 months disqualification from office for treason
3. 500 penalty units and 120 minutes imprisonment for involuntary servitude
4. 500 penalty units and 2 months disqualification from office for Abuse of power
5. 30 Penalty Units and 15 minutes imprisonment for incitement
6. A total of: 2030 Penalty Units, 255 minutes imprisonment, 4 months disqualification from office.

On behalf of the commonwealth respectfully submitted,
Lead Counsel: Solicitor General DETECTIVHOLMES on behalf of The Commonwealth of Redmont
Assistant Counsel: Special Prosecutor Dearev on behalf of The Commonwealth of Redmont
Secondary Counsel: Prosecutor Culls on behalf of The Commonwealth of Redmont

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 17th day of July 2026

 

Attachments

  • 1784322653560.png
    1784322653560.png
    56.6 KB · Views: 16
  • 1784322674947.png
    1784322674947.png
    227.6 KB · Views: 16
  • 1784322681747.png
    1784322681747.png
    132.8 KB · Views: 15
  • 1784322688243.png
    1784322688243.png
    279.2 KB · Views: 10
  • 1784322694848.png
    1784322694848.png
    76 KB · Views: 8
  • 1784322704421.png
    1784322704421.png
    120.7 KB · Views: 12
  • 1784322727061.png
    1784322727061.png
    198.2 KB · Views: 10
  • 1784322733834.png
    1784322733834.png
    208.1 KB · Views: 10
  • 1784322740575.png
    1784322740575.png
    428.9 KB · Views: 9
  • 1784322778011.png
    1784322778011.png
    46.3 KB · Views: 10
  • 1784322784198.png
    1784322784198.png
    12.9 KB · Views: 8
  • 1784322789928.png
    1784322789928.png
    384.9 KB · Views: 8
  • 1784322799202.png
    1784322799202.png
    101.4 KB · Views: 10
  • 1784322804535.png
    1784322804535.png
    355.1 KB · Views: 16
Last edited:
Requesting to file an amicus brief regarding whether this Court has the lawful authority to try xEndeavour considering his status as King.

(See: Trial of Charles I, Trial of Louis XVI)
 
  • Ded
Reactions: MJL
Back
Top