Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. AsexualDinosaur [2025] FCR 127

juniperfig

god's favourite princess
Administrator
Moderator
State Secretary
State Department
Justice Department
Health Department
Interior Department
Supporter
Solicitor General
Staff Legal Eagle Statesman President
juniperfig
juniperfig
State Secretary
Joined
Jan 4, 2025
Messages
327

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION

Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

AsexualDinosaur
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

PROSECUTING AUTHORITY REPORT
AsexualDinosaur breached Attorney-Client privilege by releasing legal communications between the Secretary of Commerce and the Department of Justice.

I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont
2. AsexualDinosaur

II. FACTS
1. In response to a warrant obtained by Solicitor General juniperfig, the Staff Team provided evidence showing that AsexualDinosaur is the owner of Anchor Watch News (P-001, P-002, P-003, P-004).
2. On August 18, 2025, AsexualDinosaur was confirmed as a Class A Federal Reserve Board member (P-005).
3. On August 30, 2025, Anchor Watch News released screenshots from the frb-discussion channel (P-006).
4. Other than Staff and bots, only Representatives, Senators, the FRB Governor, and FRB Board members had access to the frb-discussion channel (P-007).
5. The list of Representatives, Senators, the FRB Governor, and FRB Board Members on and around August 30, 2025 is as follows: EATB, jesseya, KattoDE, lcnglazer/Plura72/PluraGlasshouse, Moyfr, Omegabiebel, Sir_Dogeington, smokeyybunnyyy (P-008), RealImza (P-009), Smami (P-010), girlfailcoded (P-011), Bezzergeezer, Pepecuu, Sofia2750 (P-012), xSyncx, DocTheory (P-013), 1950Minecrafter (P-014), SmokedChief/DonTrillions (P-015), inceee (P-016), JediAJMan/Homelander (P-017), AsexualDinosaur (P-005).
6. On November 14, 2025, AsexualDinosaur was employed as a Prosecutor for the Department of Justice (P-018).
7. On November 14, 2025, Anchor Watch News released an article that included a screenshot of Secretary of Commerce ElysiaCrynn speaking in the DOJ-DOC communications channel (P-019, P-020).
8. Other than Staff and bots, only the President, Vice President, Attorney General, Solicitors General, RBI Director, Prosecutors, and those with the "DOC" role are able to access the DOJ-DOC communications channel (P-021).
9. The list of individuals with access to the DOJ-DOC communications channel on and around November 14, 2025 is as follows: Pepecuu (P-022), Eenza (P-023), Kaiserin_ (P-024), juniperfig, Sir_Dogeington (P-025), la_dano_34, Mask3D_Wolf, Multiman155, Nacholebraa, NovaKerbal, AsexualDinosaur, Nyeogmi, Talion77 (P-026, P-027, P-028, P-029, P-030, P-031), ElysiaCrynn (P-032). The RBI Director role was empty (P-033).
10. AsexualDinosaur is the only individual who:
(a) Has a confirmed connection to Anchor Watch News (Fact 1), and
(b) Had access to the frb-discussion channel on and around August 30, 2025 (Fact 5), and
(c) Had access to the DOJ-DOC communications channel on and around November 14, 2025 (Fact 9).
11. The leaked message constituted attorney-client communications, as it involved DOJ legal counsel discussing litigation-related matters with the Department of Commerce.
12. Anchor Watch News is not a registered legal entity with the Department of Commerce (P-034).
13. The Department of Commerce did not give written permission for Anchor Watch News or AsexualDinosaur to release the message published on November 14, 2025 (P-035).
14. On November 27, 2025, the District Court of Redmont identified AsexualDinosaur as the owner/operator of Anchor Watch News (P-036).

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charge against the Defendant:

1. Breaching Attorney Client Privilege
Releasing Attorney-Client communications without written permission is Breaching Attorney Client Privilege under the Criminal Code Act IX(9).
Given that AsexualDinosaur is the only individual who both had access to all leaked sources and owns the entity that published each release (Fact 10), it is more likely than not that he was the individual who disclosed the attorney-client communication at issue.
Because Anchor Watch News is unregistered (Fact 12), its owner may be held personally liable for its actions (Privacy Matters v. Nexalin Part II.B, Paragraph 2 and KingBOB99878 v. truffleboy123).
AsexualDinosaur, as the owner of Anchor Watch News (Fact 1, Fact 12, Fact 14), may be held personally responsible for the actions of Anchor Watch News.
Anchor Watch News released attorney-client communications without written permission (Fact 7, Fact 11, Fact 13).
Therefore, AsexualDinosaur, as the owner of Anchor Watch News, disclosed attorney-client communications without written permission, and should be held liable for this action.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:

1. 200 Penalty Units, equalling $20,000, for Breaching Attorney Client Privilege.
2. 20 minutes in prison for Breaching Attorney Client Privilege.
3. Disbarment for a period of one month for Breaching Attorney Client Privilege.

V. WITNESSES
1. AsexualDinosaur
2. ElysiaCrynn

VI. EVIDENCE

1764212528573.png
1764212538290.png
Ticket-25795.pdf
IMG_B18898C8FBAE-1.jpeg
1764212718556.png
1764212811802.png
1764212887367.png
1764227989449.png
1764228005521.png
1764228024616.png
1764212628629.png
1764213073640.png
1764213120242.png
1764213253450.png
1764228569033.png
1764228630219.png
1764228648868.png
1764228679074.png
1764228846542.png
1764228976337.png
1764228992940.png
1764229001738.png
1764228967001.png
1764229091433.png
1764228880275.png
1764228745848.png
1764214055482.png
1764263912760.png

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 27th of November 2025.

 

Attachments

  • Ticket-25795.pdf
    Ticket-25795.pdf
    877.2 KB · Views: 30
  • 1764221431351.png
    1764221431351.png
    62.6 KB · Views: 33
  • 1764221466184.png
    1764221466184.png
    41.8 KB · Views: 32
@juniperfig

For the moment, I'll be the PO on this case. A summons will occur within a few days for docket management. If there any emergent motions required, please ping me.
 

Writ of Summons


@asexualdinosaur are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. AsexualDinosaur [2025] FCR 127

In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48 hours.

Furthermore, in obedience with Rule 1.4, parties are advised that engaging in conduct that obstructs or interferes with the administration of this Court or its proceedings may be held in Contempt of Court.

Parties are advised that on December 10-14th, 2025 the Federal Court will effectively close for the week due to IRL obligations.


Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

Plea


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
PLEA

Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Asexualdinosaur
Defendant

I. ENTRY OF PLEA
1. Not Guilty to 1 count of Breaching Attorney-Client Privilege

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 3rd day of December 2025

 
Thank you,

Discovery now open, 12/8/25 @ 10AM EST.
 

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO STRIKE

We ask the court to strike exhibit P-036 as it has no bearing in this case. The exhibit shows a ruling in a civil case that was made based on balance of probabilities. As this is a criminal case with a higher standard of proof, this exhibit does nothing to prove Asexualdinosaur is the owner of Anchor Watch News beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, it is not relevant and should be struck.



Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - HEARSAY

Exhibit P-035 is an out of court statement trying to be used to prove fact. The exhibit clearly shows the prosecution asking a witness a question. This is circumventing our right to cross examine the witness. It also gives the witness the ability to lie as they are not under oath or under threat of perjury. The person should be called as a witness and give such testimony in court.



Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - IMPROPER EVIDENCE

We ask that exhibit P-003 be resubmitted as at it is clearly some sort of PDF, but it is inaccessible by the defense and most likely the court as all that is showing is the file name "Ticket-25795.pdf".

 

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO STRIKE

We ask the court to strike exhibit P-036 as it has no bearing in this case. The exhibit shows a ruling in a civil case that was made based on balance of probabilities. As this is a criminal case with a higher standard of proof, this exhibit does nothing to prove Asexualdinosaur is the owner of Anchor Watch News beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, it is not relevant and should be struck.



Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - HEARSAY

Exhibit P-035 is an out of court statement trying to be used to prove fact. The exhibit clearly shows the prosecution asking a witness a question. This is circumventing our right to cross examine the witness. It also gives the witness the ability to lie as they are not under oath or under threat of perjury. The person should be called as a witness and give such testimony in court.



Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - IMPROPER EVIDENCE

We ask that exhibit P-003 be resubmitted as at it is clearly some sort of PDF, but it is inaccessible by the defense and most likely the court as all that is showing is the file name "Ticket-25795.pdf".

We retract out objection for improper evidence, we did not see the file at the very bottom of the filing
 

Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - HEARSAY

Exhibit P-035 is an out of court statement trying to be used to prove fact. The exhibit clearly shows the prosecution asking a witness a question. This is circumventing our right to cross examine the witness. It also gives the witness the ability to lie as they are not under oath or under threat of perjury. The person should be called as a witness and give such testimony in court.

Hearsay Objection on P-035 is sustained.
 

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The prosecution clearly has failed to uphold their duty to disclose in this case now that discovery is over. As seen in exhibit P-004 the warrant they got to acquire the evidence being used against my client was originally denied. Having the entire warrant including why it was originally denied could help our case by possibly putting the warrants validity in question. Without this warrant the prosecution has no case as it would all be fruit of the poisonous tree.

We ask that the commonwealth be compelled to supply the entirety of this warrant.



Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

Your Honor,

We ask that the commonwealth but more specifically Juniperfig be held in contempt for this failure to uphold their duty to disclose. This should have been disclosed in discovery but as it hasn't been, the prosecution has now obstructed in the courts administration of its proceedings. Instead of moving on to the next point of this case we are now forced to litigate what should had already been settled in discovery.

 
Your Honor,

Commonwealth requests a closed court session to discuss and respond to the motion for sanctions and motion to compel, noting that our response would contain personal information.
 

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

Your Honor,

We ask that the commonwealth but more specifically Juniperfig be held in contempt for this failure to uphold their duty to disclose. This should have been disclosed in discovery but as it hasn't been, the prosecution has now obstructed in the courts administration of its proceedings. Instead of moving on to the next point of this case we are now forced to litigate what should had already been settled in discovery.



Discussed in closed session, motion dismissed as moot.

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The prosecution clearly has failed to uphold their duty to disclose in this case now that discovery is over. As seen in exhibit P-004 the warrant they got to acquire the evidence being used against my client was originally denied. Having the entire warrant including why it was originally denied could help our case by possibly putting the warrants validity in question. Without this warrant the prosecution has no case as it would all be fruit of the poisonous tree.

We ask that the commonwealth be compelled to supply the entirety of this warrant.


Granted. The Commonwealth shall produce the warrant within the timeframe presented.


Discovery extended to 12/13/25 @ 10am EST
 
Your Honor,

The Commonwealth introduces the following into evidence pursuant to the motion to compel:

1765238449975.jpeg
 
Back
Top