Lawsuit: Pending Superwoops v. Trentrick_Lamar [2026] DCR 18

Superwoops

Citizen
Public Defender
Oakridge Resident
Justice Department
5th Anniversary Change Maker Popular in the Polls
Superwoops
Superwoops
Public Defender
Joined
Jan 3, 2025
Messages
224

Case Filing


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Superwoops
Plaintiff

v.

Trentrick_Lamar
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

Trentrick_Lamar, in an auction, sold three villagers to Superwoops for the sum of $5,000. Superwoops was not able to collect the villagers before being permanently deported.


I. PARTIES

1. Superwoops (Plaintiff)
2. Trentrick_Lamar (Defendant)

II. FACTS

1. On December 7th, 2025, the Defendant posted an auction titled "Three Villagers".
2. Following a number of bids, Superwoops won the auction with his bid of $5,000 on December 9th.
3. The Defendant recognised the legitimate winning bid by replying to the $5,000 bid and saying "A winner is you!"
4. The DOC Secretary sent a message in the auction thread and did not raise any issues with the way it was handled.
5. After asking for the delivery of the villagers on December 14th, the Defendant provided rough instructions on how to pick them up by checking the game map.
6. The Defendant was temporarily deported on December 19th, then permanently deported on December 28th. (P-001)
7. The Defendant's deportation made the Plaintiff unable to collect on their contractually agreed upon villagers.
8. The current value of three villagers is $24,000. (P-002 and P-003)​


III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. The auction was a valid contract between both parties. Superwoops fulfilled his end by paying $5,000 to the Defendant. In turn, the Defendant has not fulfilled their contractual obligations. The Plaintiff asks the Court to assist the Defendant in fulfilling his contractual obligations. This is upheld in Lawsuit: Adjourned - GraprielJuice V. Aesyr [2025] DCR 100.
2. The deprivation of the three villagers harmed the Plaintiff's future earning capacity from December 9th to the present day, over two months.​

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $24,000 in compensatory damages for the current value of three villagers. In a recent (January 24th) marketplace thread buying villager eggs opened by IamJeb_, Alfie Dug acknowledged villager eggs sell for as much as $10,000. Another citizen, ZxRiptide, offered to sell IamJeb_ an egg for $10,000, then lowering his offer to $8,000, described by him as "8 firm" (relating to his offer not going lower than $8,000). IamJeb_ accepted this offer by replying "fine". Therefore, the value of three villagers is calculated to be $24,000. (See P-002 and P-003)
2. $7,500 in nominal damages for the harm of the Plaintiff's future earning capacity had the Plaintiff come into possession of the three villagers back in December. Additionally, this can also be seen as compensation for harmed earning capacity from the deprivation of $5,000 with nothing in return for over two months, a sum of money that could have been better invested elsewhere.
2. $9,450 in legal fees (30% of case value) payable to Superwoops.​

V. EVIDENCE

Screenshot 2026-02-15 at 12.32.17 pm.png
Screenshot 2026-02-15 at 1.10.09 pm.png
Screenshot 2026-02-15 at 1.10.29 pm.png
Screenshot 2026-02-15 at 1.11.55 pm.png
Screenshot 2026-02-15 at 1.12.05 pm.png
Screenshot 2026-02-15 at 1.12.18 pm.png
Screenshot 2026-02-15 at 1.12.27 pm.png

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 15th day of February 2026.

 
1771186603221.png

defendant perm deported, case in recess pending default.
 
Back
Top