Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

Franciscus said:

Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE


Your Honor:

Repeatedly, throughout this case, xEndeavour has made repeated outbursts that are not permitted under the Court Rules. Rather than waiting patiently for Your Honor to rule, as the Plaintiff is doing here, xEndeavour is seeking to add additional filings without permission under the Court Rules.

The Court Rules have purpose. They help maintain decorum in the Court, and they set standards for how lawyers should be acting.

Repeated outbursts from xEndeavour have disrupted the flow of the Court, and have caused the Plaintiff's counsel to fill up Your Honor's docket with objections that need not be filed but for xEndeavour's outbursts.

The Plaintiff's counsel respects your time, and kindly asks that xEndeavours outbursts be stricken. As xEndevour has already been warned about this, the Plaintiff's counsel asks Your Honor to hold xEndeavour in contempt here.

Click to expand...

Your Honour, respectfully, the Plaintiff throughout this case has attempted to weaponise the court rules. Nothing from the Defence team has been unreasonable and we request that you use your powers under the court rules to make reasonable amendments to prevent the plaintiff from weaponising the court rules.

The Defence has conducted itself with respect for this Court and the proceedings. Where responses have been filed, they have been filed in circumstances that warrant clarification, context, or your attention.

The Plaintiff’s characterisation of these responses as 'outbursts' is misplaced. The Defence has not engaged in conduct intended to disrupt proceedings, but has instead sought to ensure that the Court is presented with all relevant information in a timely manner so that you can make an informed decision - particularly in circumstances where the Plaintiff may be seeking to misguide or mislead the court.

Such information is directly related to the issues before the Court and is important for a fair and just determination of this matter. The Defence submits that to strike these filings would deprive the Court of material considerations and would unfairly prejudice the Defence’s case. Respectfully, no contempt arises from a party fulfilling their duty to present facts and argument in aid of the Court’s deliberation.
 
Apologies for the extreme tardiness on my end. I moved for college, and it's been complicated.

I'm going to assume it's needed so Discovery is being extended by 4 days from the time of this post. The Court will be addressing motions and any pertinent objections shortly.
 
Franciscus said:
Your Honor,

Pursuant to Rule 4.6 (Submission of Discovery, Voluntary), the Plaintiff submits the following evidence into the case record:
C343 - Eviction AuctionView attachment 59421
View attachment 59422
View attachment 59423
View attachment 59424
View attachment 59425
View attachment 59426
View attachment 59427
View attachment 59428
View attachment 59429
View attachment 59430
View attachment 59431
View attachment 59432
View attachment 59433
View attachment 59434
View attachment 59435
View attachment 59437
View attachment 59438
View attachment 59439
View attachment 59440
View attachment 59441
View attachment 59442
View attachment 59443
View attachment 59436



Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff seeks to compel The Commonwealth of Redmont to produce the following information based on the following reasons:

  1. Any entries from Dearev in the #Commands channel on the Department of Construction and Transportation Discord server sent between 2:30 Eastern Daylight Time on 30 July 2025 and 3:00 Eastern Daylight Time on 30 July 2025, including full and complete timestamps and message metadata.
    1. Reason: These records should include the will establish the exact moments at which each property was evicted, and will allow for better precision in establishing the timeline.
  2. Any entries in any discord ticket created or responded to by the Commonwealth or its agents on any DemocracyCraft-related server regarding the evictions described published before the submission of the initial complaint by the Plaintiff and in the 15 calendar days prior (inclusive, in Eastern Daylight Time);
    1. Reason: These records should include and will establish a substantial part of communications that the Commonwealth may have had internally regarding these evictions before this lawsuit was actually filed.
  3. Any messages (including metadata and complete timestamps) sent on the Department of Construction and Transportation Discord server published on or after 15 July 2025 (Eastern Daylight Time) and the time of the defense's submission of their initial answer to complaint containing any of the following strings or substrings, capitalization ignored: "end"; "yg"; "nate"; "yeetg"; "dearev"; "mystic"; "early"; "mature"; "corrupt"; "time"; "Lawan"; "legal"; "law"; "licit"; "477"; "025"; "017"; "018"; "073"; "047"; "054"; "343"; "tyson"; "mike"; "miek"; "ilt"; "tusk"; "ill"; "love"; "lcn"; "TON"; "GER"; "galac"; "empir"; "imperial".
    1. Reason: The Plaintiff seeks to discover internal DCT communications in the run-up to and aftermath from these evictions regarding (1) DCT staff regarding to the witnesses in this case; (2) the agents of the DCT who took action with respect to the auctions; (3) the plots themselves; (4) the Plaintiff (under any of his current or previous names or abbreviatiosn thereof; see Exhibit P-MC1); (5) discussions of early, premature, or untimely evictions; (6) discussions of unlawful, illegal, or corrupt activities; and (7) discussions as it pertains to the GER (of which the Plaintiff has been a prominent member). Each of these, the Plaintiff believes, may be quite relevant to this case and the allegations contained herein, as we want to firmly establish in the record what the Commonwealth knew and when it knew it.



Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff seeks a subpoena to personally compel Dearev to produce the following items for discovery, and for the following reasons:

  1. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent or received by Dearev anywhere on Discord between 1 June 2025 and the time of this filing containing any of the following strings or substrings: "477"; "025"; "017"; "018"; "073"; "047"; "054"; "343";
    1. Reason 1: This will allow discussion of the plots evicted by Dearev to be present in the Court record, even if not on a DemocracyCraft server.
    2. Reason 2: As for the timing: per Exhibit P-010, Dearev had expressed interest in plot c343 on June 4, 2025, and the Plaintiff seeks more information regarding this attempt to purchase, whether through internal discussions with other GlobalCenter staff (see also: exhibit P-014, where Dearev displays "GlobalCenter's bank acc[ount]" in an image within the auction thread for c343).
  2. Any messages sent or received by Dearev anywhere on Discord between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
    1. Reason: The Plaintiff alleges that Dearev's efforts were improper, and the Plaintiff seeks additional messages to better discover the motive of Dearev's actions or whether or not Dearev may have directly ordered or influenced others regarding these auctions in communications outside of the DCT discord.
  3. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by Dearev anywhere on Discord between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
    1. The Plaintiff seeks to discover if Dearev, who evicted the plots too early (see: Exhibit P-001, Exhibit P-015), had reason to believe or otherwise knew that any evictions, auctions, sales, or transfers of any of the Plots were improper. The Plaintiff requests communications regarding these plots as such.


Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff seeks a subpoena to personally compel MysticPhunky to produce the following items for discovery, and for the following reasons:

  1. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by MysticPhunky anywhere on Discord between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
    1. The Plaintiff seeks to discover if MysticPhunky, who opened at least one eviction auction for these plots (see: Exhibit P-014), had reason to believe or otherwise knew that any evictions, auctions, sales, or transfers of any of the Plots were improper. The Plaintiff requests communications regarding these plots as such.


Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff seeks a subpoena to personally compel Lawanoesepr to produce the following items for discovery, and for the following reasons:

  1. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by Lawanoesepr anywhere on Discord between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
    1. The Plaintiff seeks to discover if Lawanoesepr, who reported the plots for eviction (see: Exhibit P-001), had reason to believe or otherwise knew that any evictions, auctions, sales, or transfers of any of the Plots were improper. The Plaintiff requests communications regarding these plots as such.


Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff seeks a subpoena to personally compel Sir_Dogeington to produce the following items for discovery, and for the following reasons:

  1. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by Sir_Dogeington anywhere on Discord between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
    1. The Plaintiff seeks to discover if Sir_Dogeington, who commented in the DCT ticket regarding whether or not the Plaintiff had sufficient playtime to avoid eviction (see: Exhibit P-002), had reason to believe or otherwise knew that any evictions, auctions, sales, or transfers of any of the Plots were improper. The Plaintiff requests communications regarding these plots as such.


Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff seeks a subpoena to personally compel xEndeavour to produce the following items for discovery, and for the following reasons:

  1. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by xEndeavour anywhere on Discord between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
    1. The Plaintiff seeks to discover if xEndeavour, who denied in a discord ticket that the Plaintiff was evicted early (see: Exhibit P-002) and later admitted that the Plaintiff was evicted early following the filing of this suit (see: Exhibit P-015), had reason to believe or otherwise knew that any evictions, auctions, sales, or transfers of any of the Plots were improper. The Plaintiff requests communications regarding these plots as such.

Click to expand...

Court Order


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76
SUBPOENAS

@dearev, @MysticPhunky, @lawanoesepr, @Dogeington, and @End are ORDERED TO PROVIDE the documents described by the attached quote. Apologies for the brevity.

Reminder for @dearev specifically: you have the right to plead the fifth instead of providing any requested information. For your convenience, the fifth right states, "Every citizen has the right to not produce self-incriminating evidence in any situation. In criminal matters, no adverse inferences may be made from this right being exercised, specifically such that the exercise of this right in itself shall not be weighted when determining a verdict in criminal Court."

 
JunkCereal said:

Court Order


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76
SUBPOENAS

@dearev, @MysticPhunky, @lawanoesepr, @Dogeington, and @End are ORDERED TO PROVIDE the documents described by the attached quote. Apologies for the brevity.

Reminder for @dearev specifically: you have the right to plead the fifth instead of providing any requested information. For your convenience, the fifth right states, "Every citizen has the right to not produce self-incriminating evidence in any situation. In criminal matters, no adverse inferences may be made from this right being exercised, specifically such that the exercise of this right in itself shall not be weighted when determining a verdict in criminal Court."

Click to expand...
Your Honor,
No such messages exist.
 
Franciscus said:
Your Honor:

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Pursuant to Rule 4.7, the Plaintiff seeks to compel the following from the Commonwealth:

  1. The entirety of the thread in which the messages attached in the below quoted post from xEndeavour was sent:
The Plaintiff is not aware of the server on which this message was sent, but believes that Dearev's message was not unprompted. Other messages in that thread (such as xEndeavour's message to Dearev or the video of Dearev actioning a plot) may be relevant to the trial via the Commonwealth's knowledge of relevant facts, and the Plaintiff therefore requests it in discovery.

Click to expand...
Denied for the reason posed by Defendant.

End said:
Interrogatories
1. Was the plaintiff a realtor at any point during July/August this year?

Request for Production
1. Contingent to the plaintiff being a realtor during this period: Please provide evidence of when you left that occupation.

The defence submits the following evidence:

D-009
Edit: Time taken: within 5 minutes of this post.
View attachment 59903
Click to expand...
Plaintiff is ordered to answer the interrogatory and provide the requested evidence.
 
JunkCereal said:

Court Order


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76
SUBPOENAS

@dearev, @MysticPhunky, @lawanoesepr, @Dogeington, and @End are ORDERED TO PROVIDE the documents described by the attached quote. Apologies for the brevity.

Reminder for @dearev specifically: you have the right to plead the fifth instead of providing any requested information. For your convenience, the fifth right states, "Every citizen has the right to not produce self-incriminating evidence in any situation. In criminal matters, no adverse inferences may be made from this right being exercised, specifically such that the exercise of this right in itself shall not be weighted when determining a verdict in criminal Court."

Click to expand...
Your honor,
I would also add that myself, nor any citizen of redmont, is not under any obligation to share dms, as seen in the precedent set in ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 82.
Therefore the scope requested in your subpoena of "Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by Sir_Dogeington anywhere on Discord" I am unable and unwilling to comply with.
 
Last edited:
End said:
Interrogatories
1. Was the plaintiff a realtor at any point during July/August this year?
Click to expand...
1. As of the time of this post, yes.
 
JunkCereal said:
Denied for the reason posed by Defendant.


Plaintiff is ordered to answer the interrogatory and provide the requested evidence.
Click to expand...

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER

Your Honor:

As it applies to the date at which a profession is left, it is my understanding that these the records are kept by the Department of Education. To the best of my knowledge, there is not an easily accessible way for players to view their time of change.

If these are kept by the DoE, the Commonwealth already should have the records in their possession. For this reason, the Plaintiff asks that a subpoena be issued to the DoE for these records, rather than the Plaintiff being required to produce them.

 
Dogeington said:
Your honor,
I would also add that myself, nor any citizen of redmont, is not under any obligation to share dms, as seen in the precedent set in ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 82.
Therefore the scope requested in your subpoena of "Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by Sir_Dogeington anywhere on Discord" I am unable and unwilling to comply with.
Click to expand...

Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION – BREACH OF PROCEDURE

Your Honor,

Sir_Dogeington is not a part to this case and is not a member of the staff team. He is not entitled to an automatic and subsequent interjection stating that he is unwilling or unable the subpoena after affirmatively returning that he found no such messages.



What’s more, Your Honor, I kindly ask to respond substantially and present additional communications with the staff team regarding scope of the staff rule should the above objection not be sustained.
 
Dogeington said:
Your honor,
I would also add that myself, nor any citizen of redmont, is not under any obligation to share dms, as seen in the precedent set in ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 82.
Therefore the scope requested in your subpoena of "Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by Sir_Dogeington anywhere on Discord" I am unable and unwilling to comply with.
Click to expand...

The Defence respectfully submits that:

No citizen of redmont is not under any obligation to share dms, as seen in the precedent set in ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 82.

Therefore the scope requested in your subpoena of ‘any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by <user> anywhere on Discord‘ is unlawful.
 
JunkCereal said:

Court Order


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76
SUBPOENAS

@dearev, @MysticPhunky, @lawanoesepr, @Dogeington, and @End are ORDERED TO PROVIDE the documents described by the attached quote. Apologies for the brevity.

Reminder for @dearev specifically: you have the right to plead the fifth instead of providing any requested information. For your convenience, the fifth right states, "Every citizen has the right to not produce self-incriminating evidence in any situation. In criminal matters, no adverse inferences may be made from this right being exercised, specifically such that the exercise of this right in itself shall not be weighted when determining a verdict in criminal Court."

Click to expand...

I don't believe I, as a witness, have anything further to produce to this court that hasn't already been produced. I cannot recall any other circumstances where the yeetglazer's plots was discussed outside of the tickets and the conversations already submitted. The breadth of this request is extensive and excessive at best and beyond what one can recall or research to find anything further.
 
JunkCereal said:

Court Order​


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76
SUBPOENAS

@dearev, @MysticPhunky, @lawanoesepr, @Dogeington, and @End are ORDERED TO PROVIDE the documents described by the attached quote. Apologies for the brevity.

Reminder for @dearev specifically: you have the right to plead the fifth instead of providing any requested information. For your convenience, the fifth right states, "Every citizen has the right to not produce self-incriminating evidence in any situation. In criminal matters, no adverse inferences may be made from this right being exercised, specifically such that the exercise of this right in itself shall not be weighted when determining a verdict in criminal Court."
Click to expand...
Your honor,
Some of the massages requested are related to ongoing legal action in DCR 61

I request a sidebar to decide what information should be shared.
 
dodrio3

Lawsuit: Pending Thread 'Dearev (Represented by Lex Titanum) v. YeetGlazer [2025] DCR 61'

Case Filing


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Dearev (Represented by Lex Titanum)
Plaintiff

v.

YeetGlazer
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On August 3rd, 2025, in case [2025] FCR 76, the Defendant released a statement that senselessly accused the Plaintiff of corruption. In this statement, the Defendant claimed that “The Plaintiff posits that premature eviction also amounts to Corruption as defined by Redmont’s criminal code. A government official commits corruption, under...
Click to expand...


Your honour, Dearev is now litigating the matter of corruption concerning him in a separate case in the District Court.

I offer that it would be prejudicial for the Commonwealth to continue discussing the corruption allegations against that individual and request that it be severed from this case and litigated separately, where they can represent themselves.
 
End said:
dodrio3

Lawsuit: Pending Thread 'Dearev (Represented by Lex Titanum) v. YeetGlazer [2025] DCR 61'

Case Filing


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Dearev (Represented by Lex Titanum)
Plaintiff

v.

YeetGlazer
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On August 3rd, 2025, in case [2025] FCR 76, the Defendant released a statement that senselessly accused the Plaintiff of corruption. In this statement, the Defendant claimed that “The Plaintiff posits that premature eviction also amounts to Corruption as defined by Redmont’s criminal code. A government official commits corruption, under...
Click to expand...


Your honour, Dearev is now litigating the matter of corruption concerning him in a separate case in the District Court.

I offer that it would be prejudicial for the Commonwealth to continue discussing the corruption allegations against that individual and request that it be severed from this case and litigated separately, where they can represent themselves.
Click to expand...

Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE

xEndeavour’s statement is not written as a motion, nor a request to speak, nor an objection. In the most favorable possible light to xEndeavour, it be an ill-formatted motion to dismiss seeking for claims relating to Dearev’s corruption to be dismissed in this case. (In the least favorable light there’d be nothing that could be actioned under the Court rules. Resultantly, this would just be another impermissible outburst from xEndeavour that should be stricken from the record.)

Under Rule 5.1 (Rule Specification), the filer of a motion to dismiss is required to “specify the Discovery Rule that a lawyer wishes to submit under”. But xEndeavour’s pseudo-motion doesn’t do this — even if taken as a motion, it should be stricken under Rule 5.1.

As such, no matter how this is sliced, it appears that xEndeavour has once again clearly breached procedure during this case — the message should be stricken as such.

In the event that motion is not sustained, or that the statement is not stricken for breaching procedure, the a plaintiff seeks permission from Your Honor to substantially respond.

 
Franciscus said:

Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE

xEndeavour’s statement is not written as a motion, nor a request to speak, nor an objection. In the most favorable possible light to xEndeavour, it be an ill-formatted motion to dismiss seeking for claims relating to Dearev’s corruption to be dismissed in this case. (In the least favorable light there’d be nothing that could be actioned under the Court rules. Resultantly, this would just be another impermissible outburst from xEndeavour that should be stricken from the record.)

Under Rule 5.1 (Rule Specification), the filer of a motion to dismiss is required to “specify the Discovery Rule that a lawyer wishes to submit under”. But xEndeavour’s pseudo-motion doesn’t do this — even if taken as a motion, it should be stricken under Rule 5.1.

As such, no matter how this is sliced, it appears that xEndeavour has once again clearly breached procedure during this case — the message should be stricken as such.

In the event that motion is not sustained, or that the statement is not stricken for breaching procedure, the a plaintiff seeks permission from Your Honor to substantially respond.

Click to expand...

There is no motion or objection that this fits into, hence raising it with the judge directly.
 
End said:
@JunkCereal
Click to expand...

Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION — BREACH OF PROCEDURE

Your Honor,

As was the case here, this comment doesn’t really appear to add anything to this case and doesn’t appear to make any request of Your Honor in and of itself. I kindly ask that it be stricken as such.

 
Franciscus said:

Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION — BREACH OF PROCEDURE

Your Honor,

As was the case here, this comment doesn’t really appear to add anything to this case and doesn’t appear to make any request of Your Honor in and of itself. I kindly ask that it be stricken as such.

Click to expand...

I am pinging the judge as he was online today and hasn't responded for over 72 hours. While he is a very busy person, sometimes a ping helps keep a case moving by requesting attention.

The plaintiff objecting to absolutely everything is insufferable - I urge you to employ some common sense and I trust that the Judge will also see this.
 
JunkCereal said:

Court Order


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76
SUBPOENAS

@dearev, @MysticPhunky, @lawanoesepr, @Dogeington, and @End are ORDERED TO PROVIDE the documents described by the attached quote. Apologies for the brevity.

Reminder for @dearev specifically: you have the right to plead the fifth instead of providing any requested information. For your convenience, the fifth right states, "Every citizen has the right to not produce self-incriminating evidence in any situation. In criminal matters, no adverse inferences may be made from this right being exercised, specifically such that the exercise of this right in itself shall not be weighted when determining a verdict in criminal Court."

Click to expand...
Apologies for failing to meet the deadline your honor,

Per set in Lawsuit: Dismissed - ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 82 i am not required to provide any information on my DMs as the courts have no jurisdiction over; therefore i am unable to comply with this courts request.
 
dearev said:
Apologies for failing to meet the deadline your honor,

Per set in Lawsuit: Dismissed - ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 82 i am not required to provide any information on my DMs as the courts have no jurisdiction over; therefore i am unable to comply with this courts request.
Click to expand...

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

That Dearev objects to sending direct messages does not preclude Dearev from sending messages he sent in any DC-related server. Pending analysis on the subpoenas more broadly, the Plaintiff asks that Dearev be compelled to provide any messages to this Court that were sent in any DC-related server or group chat.

 
Franciscus said:

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

That Dearev objects to sending direct messages does not preclude Dearev from sending messages he sent in any DC-related server. Pending analysis on the subpoenas more broadly, the Plaintiff asks that Dearev be compelled to provide any messages to this Court that were sent in any DC-related server or group chat.

Click to expand...
Granted.

End said:
I am pinging the judge as he was online today and hasn't responded for over 72 hours. While he is a very busy person, sometimes a ping helps keep a case moving by requesting attention.

The plaintiff objecting to absolutely everything is insufferable - I urge you to employ some common sense and I trust that the Judge will also see this.
Click to expand...
This is perfectly understandable. Though procedure generally helps things move along in an understandable and orderly manner, it can - in certain situations - become a hindrance. It is difficult as it is to sort through everything with the limited time I have. Having to sort through objections pertaining trivialities that are in part my own fault will only increase delays and increase the likelihood important points are missed. The Court will more than likely be ignoring objections that aren't relevant to the merits of the case. Please use discretion for the sake of everyone involved.

End said:
dodrio3

Lawsuit: Pending Thread 'Dearev (Represented by Lex Titanum) v. YeetGlazer [2025] DCR 61'

Case Filing


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Dearev (Represented by Lex Titanum)
Plaintiff

v.

YeetGlazer
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On August 3rd, 2025, in case [2025] FCR 76, the Defendant released a statement that senselessly accused the Plaintiff of corruption. In this statement, the Defendant claimed that “The Plaintiff posits that premature eviction also amounts to Corruption as defined by Redmont’s criminal code. A government official commits corruption, under...
Click to expand...


Your honour, Dearev is now litigating the matter of corruption concerning him in a separate case in the District Court.

I offer that it would be prejudicial for the Commonwealth to continue discussing the corruption allegations against that individual and request that it be severed from this case and litigated separately, where they can represent themselves.
Click to expand...
The Commonwealth has admitted to having vicarious liability in this case. If the Plaintiff's claim of corruption is vindicated, then the Commonwealth may be vicariously liable for any damages caused by said corruption. It is for this reason, and the aforementioned stated reasons, that this request is denied. It should also be noted that it is the Commonwealth on trial in this case and not the named individual.
 
JunkCereal said:
Granted.


This is perfectly understandable. Though procedure generally helps things move along in an understandable and orderly manner, it can - in certain situations - become a hindrance. It is difficult as it is to sort through everything with the limited time I have. Having to sort through objections pertaining trivialities that are in part my own fault will only increase delays and increase the likelihood important points are missed. The Court will more than likely be ignoring objections that aren't relevant to the merits of the case. Please use discretion for the sake of everyone involved.


The Commonwealth has admitted to having vicarious liability in this case. If the Plaintiff's claim of corruption is vindicated, then the Commonwealth may be vicariously liable for any damages caused by said corruption. It is for this reason, and the aforementioned stated reasons, that this request is denied. It should also be noted that it is the Commonwealth on trial in this case and not the named individual.
Click to expand...

1. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent or received by Dearev anywhere on Discord [On DC related servers] between 1 June 2025 and the time of this filing containing any of the following strings or substrings: "477"; "025"; "017"; "018"; "073"; "047"; "054"; "343";
  1. Reason 1: This will allow discussion of the plots evicted by Dearev to be present in the Court record, even if not on a DemocracyCraft server.
  2. Reason 2: As for the timing: per Exhibit P-010, Dearev had expressed interest in plot c343 on June 4, 2025, and the Plaintiff seeks more information regarding this attempt to purchase, whether through internal discussions with other GlobalCenter staff (see also: exhibit P-014, where Dearev displays "GlobalCenter's bank acc[ount]" in an image within the auction thread for c343
GlobalCenter discord: #board-general
1756057777839.png

  1. Any messages sent or received by Dearev anywhere on Discord [On DC related servers] between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
    1. Reason: The Plaintiff alleges that Dearev's efforts were improper, and the Plaintiff seeks additional messages to better discover the motive of Dearev's actions or whether or not Dearev may have directly ordered or influenced others regarding these auctions in communications outside of the DCT discord.
I have found no messages related to the request

  1. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by Dearev anywhere on Discord [On DC related servers] between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
    1. The Plaintiff seeks to discover if Dearev, who evicted the plots too early (see: Exhibit P-001, Exhibit P-015), had reason to believe or otherwise knew that any evictions, auctions, sales, or transfers of any of the Plots were improper. The Plaintiff requests communications regarding these plots as such.
I have found no messages related to the request



 
Your Honor,
We have been ordered to produce any relevant screenshots of conversations
We, however, will not be producing any direct messages on discord.
EVIDENCE:
1000000378.png
 
Your honour, most respectfully, can we please expediate the conduct of the trial noting this is now dragging into a second month and progress has been slow of late.

The Defence wishes to maintain tight timelines to see the case through to verdict in an efficient manner.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top