Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

[End]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE


Your Honor:

Repeatedly, throughout this case, xEndeavour has made repeated outbursts that are not permitted under the Court Rules. Rather than waiting patiently for Your Honor to rule, as the Plaintiff is doing here, xEndeavour is seeking to add additional filings without permission under the Court Rules.

The Court Rules have purpose. They help maintain decorum in the Court, and they set standards for how lawyers should be acting.

Repeated outbursts from xEndeavour have disrupted the flow of the Court, and have caused the Plaintiff's counsel to fill up Your Honor's docket with objections that need not be filed but for xEndeavour's outbursts.

The Plaintiff's counsel respects your time, and kindly asks that xEndeavours outbursts be stricken. As xEndevour has already been warned about this, the Plaintiff's counsel asks Your Honor to hold xEndeavour in contempt here.

Your Honour, respectfully, the Plaintiff throughout this case has attempted to weaponise the court rules. Nothing from the Defence team has been unreasonable and we request that you use your powers under the court rules to make reasonable amendments to prevent the plaintiff from weaponising the court rules.

The Defence has conducted itself with respect for this Court and the proceedings. Where responses have been filed, they have been filed in circumstances that warrant clarification, context, or your attention.

The Plaintiff’s characterisation of these responses as 'outbursts' is misplaced. The Defence has not engaged in conduct intended to disrupt proceedings, but has instead sought to ensure that the Court is presented with all relevant information in a timely manner so that you can make an informed decision - particularly in circumstances where the Plaintiff may be seeking to misguide or mislead the court.

Such information is directly related to the issues before the Court and is important for a fair and just determination of this matter. The Defence submits that to strike these filings would deprive the Court of material considerations and would unfairly prejudice the Defence’s case. Respectfully, no contempt arises from a party fulfilling their duty to present facts and argument in aid of the Court’s deliberation.

 

[JunkCereal]

Apologies for the extreme tardiness on my end. I moved for college, and it's been complicated.

I'm going to assume it's needed so Discovery is being extended by 4 days from the time of this post. The Court will be addressing motions and any pertinent objections shortly.

 

[JunkCereal]

Your Honor,

Pursuant to Rule 4.6 (Submission of Discovery, Voluntary), the Plaintiff submits the following evidence into the case record:

Spoiler: Exhibit P-014

C343 - Eviction AuctionView attachment 59421
View attachment 59422
View attachment 59423
View attachment 59424
View attachment 59425
View attachment 59426
View attachment 59427
View attachment 59428
View attachment 59429
View attachment 59430
View attachment 59431
View attachment 59432
View attachment 59433
View attachment 59434
View attachment 59435

Spoiler: Exhibit P-015

View attachment 59437
View attachment 59438
View attachment 59439
View attachment 59440
View attachment 59441
View attachment 59442
View attachment 59443

Spoiler: Exhibit P-MC1

View attachment 59436

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff seeks to compel The Commonwealth of Redmont to produce the following information based on the following reasons:

1. Any entries from Dearev in the #Commands channel on the Department of Construction and Transportation Discord server sent between 2:30 Eastern Daylight Time on 30 July 2025 and 3:00 Eastern Daylight Time on 30 July 2025, including full and complete timestamps and message metadata.
   1. Reason: These records should include the will establish the exact moments at which each property was evicted, and will allow for better precision in establishing the timeline.
2. Any entries in any discord ticket created or responded to by the Commonwealth or its agents on any DemocracyCraft-related server regarding the evictions described published before the submission of the initial complaint by the Plaintiff and in the 15 calendar days prior (inclusive, in Eastern Daylight Time);
   1. Reason: These records should include and will establish a substantial part of communications that the Commonwealth may have had internally regarding these evictions before this lawsuit was actually filed.
3. Any messages (including metadata and complete timestamps) sent on the Department of Construction and Transportation Discord server published on or after 15 July 2025 (Eastern Daylight Time) and the time of the defense's submission of their initial answer to complaint containing any of the following strings or substrings, capitalization ignored: "end"; "yg"; "nate"; "yeetg"; "dearev"; "mystic"; "early"; "mature"; "corrupt"; "time"; "Lawan"; "legal"; "law"; "licit"; "477"; "025"; "017"; "018"; "073"; "047"; "054"; "343"; "tyson"; "mike"; "miek"; "ilt"; "tusk"; "ill"; "love"; "lcn"; "TON"; "GER"; "galac"; "empir"; "imperial".
   1. Reason: The Plaintiff seeks to discover internal DCT communications in the run-up to and aftermath from these evictions regarding (1) DCT staff regarding to the witnesses in this case; (2) the agents of the DCT who took action with respect to the auctions; (3) the plots themselves; (4) the Plaintiff (under any of his current or previous names or abbreviatiosn thereof; see Exhibit P-MC1); (5) discussions of early, premature, or untimely evictions; (6) discussions of unlawful, illegal, or corrupt activities; and (7) discussions as it pertains to the GER (of which the Plaintiff has been a prominent member). Each of these, the Plaintiff believes, may be quite relevant to this case and the allegations contained herein, as we want to firmly establish in the record what the Commonwealth knew and when it knew it.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff seeks a subpoena to personally compel Dearev to produce the following items for discovery, and for the following reasons:

1. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent or received by Dearev anywhere on Discord between 1 June 2025 and the time of this filing containing any of the following strings or substrings: "477"; "025"; "017"; "018"; "073"; "047"; "054"; "343";
   1. Reason 1: This will allow discussion of the plots evicted by Dearev to be present in the Court record, even if not on a DemocracyCraft server.
   2. Reason 2: As for the timing: per Exhibit P-010, Dearev had expressed interest in plot c343 on June 4, 2025, and the Plaintiff seeks more information regarding this attempt to purchase, whether through internal discussions with other GlobalCenter staff (see also: exhibit P-014, where Dearev displays "GlobalCenter's bank acc[ount]" in an image within the auction thread for c343).
2. Any messages sent or received by Dearev anywhere on Discord between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
   1. Reason: The Plaintiff alleges that Dearev's efforts were improper, and the Plaintiff seeks additional messages to better discover the motive of Dearev's actions or whether or not Dearev may have directly ordered or influenced others regarding these auctions in communications outside of the DCT discord.
3. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by Dearev anywhere on Discord between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
   1. The Plaintiff seeks to discover if Dearev, who evicted the plots too early (see: Exhibit P-001, Exhibit P-015), had reason to believe or otherwise knew that any evictions, auctions, sales, or transfers of any of the Plots were improper. The Plaintiff requests communications regarding these plots as such.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff seeks a subpoena to personally compel MysticPhunky to produce the following items for discovery, and for the following reasons:

1. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by MysticPhunky anywhere on Discord between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
   1. The Plaintiff seeks to discover if MysticPhunky, who opened at least one eviction auction for these plots (see: Exhibit P-014), had reason to believe or otherwise knew that any evictions, auctions, sales, or transfers of any of the Plots were improper. The Plaintiff requests communications regarding these plots as such.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff seeks a subpoena to personally compel Lawanoesepr to produce the following items for discovery, and for the following reasons:

1. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by Lawanoesepr anywhere on Discord between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
   1. The Plaintiff seeks to discover if Lawanoesepr, who reported the plots for eviction (see: Exhibit P-001), had reason to believe or otherwise knew that any evictions, auctions, sales, or transfers of any of the Plots were improper. The Plaintiff requests communications regarding these plots as such.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff seeks a subpoena to personally compel Sir_Dogeington to produce the following items for discovery, and for the following reasons:

1. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by Sir_Dogeington anywhere on Discord between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
   1. The Plaintiff seeks to discover if Sir_Dogeington, who commented in the DCT ticket regarding whether or not the Plaintiff had sufficient playtime to avoid eviction (see: Exhibit P-002), had reason to believe or otherwise knew that any evictions, auctions, sales, or transfers of any of the Plots were improper. The Plaintiff requests communications regarding these plots as such.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff seeks a subpoena to personally compel xEndeavour to produce the following items for discovery, and for the following reasons:

1. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by xEndeavour anywhere on Discord between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
   1. The Plaintiff seeks to discover if xEndeavour, who denied in a discord ticket that the Plaintiff was evicted early (see: Exhibit P-002) and later admitted that the Plaintiff was evicted early following the filing of this suit (see: Exhibit P-015), had reason to believe or otherwise knew that any evictions, auctions, sales, or transfers of any of the Plots were improper. The Plaintiff requests communications regarding these plots as such.

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76
SUBPOENAS

@dearev, @MysticPhunky, @lawanoesepr, @Dogeington, and @End are ORDERED TO PROVIDE the documents described by the attached quote. Apologies for the brevity.

Reminder for @dearev specifically: you have the right to plead the fifth instead of providing any requested information. For your convenience, the fifth right states, "Every citizen has the right to not produce self-incriminating evidence in any situation. In criminal matters, no adverse inferences may be made from this right being exercised, specifically such that the exercise of this right in itself shall not be weighted when determining a verdict in criminal Court."

 

[Dogeington]

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76
SUBPOENAS

@dearev, @MysticPhunky, @lawanoesepr, @Dogeington, and @End are ORDERED TO PROVIDE the documents described by the attached quote. Apologies for the brevity.

Reminder for @dearev specifically: you have the right to plead the fifth instead of providing any requested information. For your convenience, the fifth right states, "Every citizen has the right to not produce self-incriminating evidence in any situation. In criminal matters, no adverse inferences may be made from this right being exercised, specifically such that the exercise of this right in itself shall not be weighted when determining a verdict in criminal Court."

Your Honor,
No such messages exist.

 

[JunkCereal]

Your Honor:

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Pursuant to Rule 4.7, the Plaintiff seeks to compel the following from the Commonwealth:

1. The entirety of the thread in which the messages attached in the below quoted post from xEndeavour was sent:

The Plaintiff is not aware of the server on which this message was sent, but believes that Dearev's message was not unprompted. Other messages in that thread (such as xEndeavour's message to Dearev or the video of Dearev actioning a plot) may be relevant to the trial via the Commonwealth's knowledge of relevant facts, and the Plaintiff therefore requests it in discovery.

Denied for the reason posed by Defendant.

Interrogatories
1. Was the plaintiff a realtor at any point during July/August this year?

Request for Production
1. Contingent to the plaintiff being a realtor during this period: Please provide evidence of when you left that occupation.

The defence submits the following evidence:

D-009
Edit: Time taken: within 5 minutes of this post.
View attachment 59903

Plaintiff is ordered to answer the interrogatory and provide the requested evidence.

 

[Dogeington]

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76
SUBPOENAS

@dearev, @MysticPhunky, @lawanoesepr, @Dogeington, and @End are ORDERED TO PROVIDE the documents described by the attached quote. Apologies for the brevity.

Reminder for @dearev specifically: you have the right to plead the fifth instead of providing any requested information. For your convenience, the fifth right states, "Every citizen has the right to not produce self-incriminating evidence in any situation. In criminal matters, no adverse inferences may be made from this right being exercised, specifically such that the exercise of this right in itself shall not be weighted when determining a verdict in criminal Court."

Your honor,
I would also add that myself, nor any citizen of redmont, is not under any obligation to share dms, as seen in the precedent set in ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 82.
Therefore the scope requested in your subpoena of "Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by Sir_Dogeington anywhere on Discord" I am unable and unwilling to comply with.

 

[Franciscus]

Interrogatories
1. Was the plaintiff a realtor at any point during July/August this year?

1. As of the time of this post, yes.

 

[Franciscus]

Denied for the reason posed by Defendant.


Plaintiff is ordered to answer the interrogatory and provide the requested evidence.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER

Your Honor:

As it applies to the date at which a profession is left, it is my understanding that these the records are kept by the Department of Education. To the best of my knowledge, there is not an easily accessible way for players to view their time of change.

If these are kept by the DoE, the Commonwealth already should have the records in their possession. For this reason, the Plaintiff asks that a subpoena be issued to the DoE for these records, rather than the Plaintiff being required to produce them.

 

[Franciscus]

Your honor,
I would also add that myself, nor any citizen of redmont, is not under any obligation to share dms, as seen in the precedent set in ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 82.
Therefore the scope requested in your subpoena of "Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by Sir_Dogeington anywhere on Discord" I am unable and unwilling to comply with.

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION – BREACH OF PROCEDURE

Your Honor,

Sir_Dogeington is not a part to this case and is not a member of the staff team. He is not entitled to an automatic and subsequent interjection stating that he is unwilling or unable the subpoena after affirmatively returning that he found no such messages.

What’s more, Your Honor, I kindly ask to respond substantially and present additional communications with the staff team regarding scope of the staff rule should the above objection not be sustained.

 

[End]

1. As of the time of this post, yes.

Can you please be more specific (dates)

 

[End]

Your honor,
I would also add that myself, nor any citizen of redmont, is not under any obligation to share dms, as seen in the precedent set in ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 82.
Therefore the scope requested in your subpoena of "Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by Sir_Dogeington anywhere on Discord" I am unable and unwilling to comply with.

The Defence respectfully submits that:

No citizen of redmont is not under any obligation to share dms, as seen in the precedent set in ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 82.

Therefore the scope requested in your subpoena of ‘any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by <user> anywhere on Discord‘ is unlawful.

 

[End]

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76
SUBPOENAS

@dearev, @MysticPhunky, @lawanoesepr, @Dogeington, and @End are ORDERED TO PROVIDE the documents described by the attached quote. Apologies for the brevity.

Reminder for @dearev specifically: you have the right to plead the fifth instead of providing any requested information. For your convenience, the fifth right states, "Every citizen has the right to not produce self-incriminating evidence in any situation. In criminal matters, no adverse inferences may be made from this right being exercised, specifically such that the exercise of this right in itself shall not be weighted when determining a verdict in criminal Court."

I don't believe I, as a witness, have anything further to produce to this court that hasn't already been produced. I cannot recall any other circumstances where the yeetglazer's plots was discussed outside of the tickets and the conversations already submitted. The breadth of this request is extensive and excessive at best and beyond what one can recall or research to find anything further.

 

[lawanoesepr]

Court Order​

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76
SUBPOENAS

@dearev, @MysticPhunky, @lawanoesepr, @Dogeington, and @End are ORDERED TO PROVIDE the documents described by the attached quote. Apologies for the brevity.

Reminder for @dearev specifically: you have the right to plead the fifth instead of providing any requested information. For your convenience, the fifth right states, "Every citizen has the right to not produce self-incriminating evidence in any situation. In criminal matters, no adverse inferences may be made from this right being exercised, specifically such that the exercise of this right in itself shall not be weighted when determining a verdict in criminal Court."

Your honor,
Some of the massages requested are related to ongoing legal action in DCR 61

I request a sidebar to decide what information should be shared.

 

[End]

Lawsuit: Pending Thread 'Dearev (Represented by Lex Titanum) v. YeetGlazer [2025] DCR 61'

Aug 12, 2025

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Dearev (Represented by Lex Titanum)
Plaintiff

v.

YeetGlazer
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On August 3rd, 2025, in case [2025] FCR 76, the Defendant released a statement that senselessly accused the Plaintiff of corruption. In this statement, the Defendant claimed that “The Plaintiff posits that premature eviction also amounts to Corruption as defined by Redmont’s criminal code. A government official commits corruption, under...

• dodrio3
• Replies: 21
• Forum: District Court

Your honour, Dearev is now litigating the matter of corruption concerning him in a separate case in the District Court.

I offer that it would be prejudicial for the Commonwealth to continue discussing the corruption allegations against that individual and request that it be severed from this case and litigated separately, where they can represent themselves.

 

[Franciscus]

Lawsuit: Pending Thread 'Dearev (Represented by Lex Titanum) v. YeetGlazer [2025] DCR 61'

Aug 12, 2025

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Dearev (Represented by Lex Titanum)
Plaintiff

v.

YeetGlazer
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On August 3rd, 2025, in case [2025] FCR 76, the Defendant released a statement that senselessly accused the Plaintiff of corruption. In this statement, the Defendant claimed that “The Plaintiff posits that premature eviction also amounts to Corruption as defined by Redmont’s criminal code. A government official commits corruption, under...

• dodrio3
• Replies: 21
• Forum: District Court

Your honour, Dearev is now litigating the matter of corruption concerning him in a separate case in the District Court.

I offer that it would be prejudicial for the Commonwealth to continue discussing the corruption allegations against that individual and request that it be severed from this case and litigated separately, where they can represent themselves.

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE

xEndeavour’s statement is not written as a motion, nor a request to speak, nor an objection. In the most favorable possible light to xEndeavour, it be an ill-formatted motion to dismiss seeking for claims relating to Dearev’s corruption to be dismissed in this case. (In the least favorable light there’d be nothing that could be actioned under the Court rules. Resultantly, this would just be another impermissible outburst from xEndeavour that should be stricken from the record.)

Under Rule 5.1 (Rule Specification), the filer of a motion to dismiss is required to “specify the Discovery Rule that a lawyer wishes to submit under”. But xEndeavour’s pseudo-motion doesn’t do this — even if taken as a motion, it should be stricken under Rule 5.1.

As such, no matter how this is sliced, it appears that xEndeavour has once again clearly breached procedure during this case — the message should be stricken as such.

In the event that motion is not sustained, or that the statement is not stricken for breaching procedure, the a plaintiff seeks permission from Your Honor to substantially respond.

 

[End]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE

xEndeavour’s statement is not written as a motion, nor a request to speak, nor an objection. In the most favorable possible light to xEndeavour, it be an ill-formatted motion to dismiss seeking for claims relating to Dearev’s corruption to be dismissed in this case. (In the least favorable light there’d be nothing that could be actioned under the Court rules. Resultantly, this would just be another impermissible outburst from xEndeavour that should be stricken from the record.)

Under Rule 5.1 (Rule Specification), the filer of a motion to dismiss is required to “specify the Discovery Rule that a lawyer wishes to submit under”. But xEndeavour’s pseudo-motion doesn’t do this — even if taken as a motion, it should be stricken under Rule 5.1.

As such, no matter how this is sliced, it appears that xEndeavour has once again clearly breached procedure during this case — the message should be stricken as such.

In the event that motion is not sustained, or that the statement is not stricken for breaching procedure, the a plaintiff seeks permission from Your Honor to substantially respond.

There is no motion or objection that this fits into, hence raising it with the judge directly.

 

[End]

@JunkCereal

 

[Franciscus]

@JunkCereal

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION — BREACH OF PROCEDURE

Your Honor,

As was the case here, this comment doesn’t really appear to add anything to this case and doesn’t appear to make any request of Your Honor in and of itself. I kindly ask that it be stricken as such.

 

[End]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION — BREACH OF PROCEDURE

Your Honor,

As was the case here, this comment doesn’t really appear to add anything to this case and doesn’t appear to make any request of Your Honor in and of itself. I kindly ask that it be stricken as such.

I am pinging the judge as he was online today and hasn't responded for over 72 hours. While he is a very busy person, sometimes a ping helps keep a case moving by requesting attention.

The plaintiff objecting to absolutely everything is insufferable - I urge you to employ some common sense and I trust that the Judge will also see this.

 

[dearev]

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76
SUBPOENAS

@dearev, @MysticPhunky, @lawanoesepr, @Dogeington, and @End are ORDERED TO PROVIDE the documents described by the attached quote. Apologies for the brevity.

Reminder for @dearev specifically: you have the right to plead the fifth instead of providing any requested information. For your convenience, the fifth right states, "Every citizen has the right to not produce self-incriminating evidence in any situation. In criminal matters, no adverse inferences may be made from this right being exercised, specifically such that the exercise of this right in itself shall not be weighted when determining a verdict in criminal Court."

Apologies for failing to meet the deadline your honor,

Per set in Lawsuit: Dismissed - ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 82 i am not required to provide any information on my DMs as the courts have no jurisdiction over; therefore i am unable to comply with this courts request.

 

[Franciscus]

Apologies for failing to meet the deadline your honor,

Per set in Lawsuit: Dismissed - ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 82 i am not required to provide any information on my DMs as the courts have no jurisdiction over; therefore i am unable to comply with this courts request.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

That Dearev objects to sending direct messages does not preclude Dearev from sending messages he sent in any DC-related server. Pending analysis on the subpoenas more broadly, the Plaintiff asks that Dearev be compelled to provide any messages to this Court that were sent in any DC-related server or group chat.

 

[JunkCereal]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

That Dearev objects to sending direct messages does not preclude Dearev from sending messages he sent in any DC-related server. Pending analysis on the subpoenas more broadly, the Plaintiff asks that Dearev be compelled to provide any messages to this Court that were sent in any DC-related server or group chat.

Granted.

I am pinging the judge as he was online today and hasn't responded for over 72 hours. While he is a very busy person, sometimes a ping helps keep a case moving by requesting attention.

The plaintiff objecting to absolutely everything is insufferable - I urge you to employ some common sense and I trust that the Judge will also see this.

This is perfectly understandable. Though procedure generally helps things move along in an understandable and orderly manner, it can - in certain situations - become a hindrance. It is difficult as it is to sort through everything with the limited time I have. Having to sort through objections pertaining trivialities that are in part my own fault will only increase delays and increase the likelihood important points are missed. The Court will more than likely be ignoring objections that aren't relevant to the merits of the case. Please use discretion for the sake of everyone involved.

Lawsuit: Pending Thread 'Dearev (Represented by Lex Titanum) v. YeetGlazer [2025] DCR 61'

Aug 12, 2025

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Dearev (Represented by Lex Titanum)
Plaintiff

v.

YeetGlazer
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On August 3rd, 2025, in case [2025] FCR 76, the Defendant released a statement that senselessly accused the Plaintiff of corruption. In this statement, the Defendant claimed that “The Plaintiff posits that premature eviction also amounts to Corruption as defined by Redmont’s criminal code. A government official commits corruption, under...

• dodrio3
• Replies: 21
• Forum: District Court

Your honour, Dearev is now litigating the matter of corruption concerning him in a separate case in the District Court.

I offer that it would be prejudicial for the Commonwealth to continue discussing the corruption allegations against that individual and request that it be severed from this case and litigated separately, where they can represent themselves.

The Commonwealth has admitted to having vicarious liability in this case. If the Plaintiff's claim of corruption is vindicated, then the Commonwealth may be vicariously liable for any damages caused by said corruption. It is for this reason, and the aforementioned stated reasons, that this request is denied. It should also be noted that it is the Commonwealth on trial in this case and not the named individual.

 

[dearev]

Granted.


This is perfectly understandable. Though procedure generally helps things move along in an understandable and orderly manner, it can - in certain situations - become a hindrance. It is difficult as it is to sort through everything with the limited time I have. Having to sort through objections pertaining trivialities that are in part my own fault will only increase delays and increase the likelihood important points are missed. The Court will more than likely be ignoring objections that aren't relevant to the merits of the case. Please use discretion for the sake of everyone involved.


The Commonwealth has admitted to having vicarious liability in this case. If the Plaintiff's claim of corruption is vindicated, then the Commonwealth may be vicariously liable for any damages caused by said corruption. It is for this reason, and the aforementioned stated reasons, that this request is denied. It should also be noted that it is the Commonwealth on trial in this case and not the named individual.

1. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent or received by Dearev anywhere on Discord [On DC related servers] between 1 June 2025 and the time of this filing containing any of the following strings or substrings: "477"; "025"; "017"; "018"; "073"; "047"; "054"; "343";

1. Reason 1: This will allow discussion of the plots evicted by Dearev to be present in the Court record, even if not on a DemocracyCraft server.
2. Reason 2: As for the timing: per Exhibit P-010, Dearev had expressed interest in plot c343 on June 4, 2025, and the Plaintiff seeks more information regarding this attempt to purchase, whether through internal discussions with other GlobalCenter staff (see also: exhibit P-014, where Dearev displays "GlobalCenter's bank acc[ount]" in an image within the auction thread for c343

GlobalCenter discord: #board-general

1. Any messages sent or received by Dearev anywhere on Discord [On DC related servers] between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
   
   1. Reason: The Plaintiff alleges that Dearev's efforts were improper, and the Plaintiff seeks additional messages to better discover the motive of Dearev's actions or whether or not Dearev may have directly ordered or influenced others regarding these auctions in communications outside of the DCT discord.

I have found no messages related to the request

1. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by Dearev anywhere on Discord [On DC related servers] between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
   
   1. The Plaintiff seeks to discover if Dearev, who evicted the plots too early (see: Exhibit P-001, Exhibit P-015), had reason to believe or otherwise knew that any evictions, auctions, sales, or transfers of any of the Plots were improper. The Plaintiff requests communications regarding these plots as such.

I have found no messages related to the request

 

[lawanoesepr]

Your Honor,
We have been ordered to produce any relevant screenshots of conversations
We, however, will not be producing any direct messages on discord.
EVIDENCE:

 

[End]

Your honour, most respectfully, can we please expediate the conduct of the trial noting this is now dragging into a second month and progress has been slow of late.

The Defence wishes to maintain tight timelines to see the case through to verdict in an efficient manner.

 

[End]

@JunkCereal

 

[JunkCereal]

I would like to apologize to both parties and to the citizens who have been likely awaiting the outcome of this case. Unfortunately, given IRL obligations, I have delayed this case more than it should have been.

I'm stepping down as a judge and so officially recuse from the case as the presiding officer.

 

[ameslap]

I will be taking over this case for the time being.

Can both counsels respond to exactly what is still outstanding in Discovery so we can move forward?

 

[Franciscus]

I will be taking over this case for the time being.

Can both counsels respond to exactly what is still outstanding in Discovery so we can move forward?

Your Honor:

I am currently traveling and without access to my laptop until later tonight. May I request a 36-hour extension on this?

 

[ameslap]

Your Honor:

I am currently traveling and without access to my laptop until later tonight. May I request a 36-hour extension on this?

Well if I give you an extension, I have to give everyone one....

So sure! But I will not allow any more extensions on this matter.

 

[Franciscus]

Your Honor:

To the best of the Plaintiff's knowledge, the following items are still pending or may require your attention:

• A sidebar with Lawanoesepr regarding the scope of the subpoena, though there was some filing here.
• While Dearev returned DC-related servers, Dearev did not appear to return DC-related group chats. This information is still pending.
• I don't see MysticPhunky having returned anything with regards to the subpoena, so a statement that "no messages were found" or the actual messages would be nice to have.
• A perjury objection is pending a ruling.
• A second perjury objection is pending a ruling.
• The Defense has yet to amend their complaint. Discovery has been ended for a few days, which means that the Plaintiff is probably entitled under Rule 3.6 to a default judgement at this time. In light of that rule, the Plaintiff requests a default judgment against the defendant for failure to submit defense. If a default judgement granted would not be against the defendant on all claims, the Plaintiff would like to proceed to witness testimony, as we believe testimony could assist us in proving certain claims in this case.

I apologize if there is an omission/error here, as it's been a bit since I've looked at this case while awaiting rulings, though I've made the above to the best of my ability.

 

[ameslap]

Alright so we will be entering a short recess while I look through everything and get us back on track. Discovery ended on August 24 as it was not extended by the previous Judge or myself since.

I will attempt to have everything in order tomorrow, the request for a 3.6 Default is noted. During the recess, the only item that I will allow to be submitted is a response to the motion on the 3.6 Default from the Defense.

Thank you.

 

[ameslap]

Your honor,
Some of the massages requested are related to ongoing legal action in DCR 61

I request a sidebar to decide what information should be shared.

Please join the Judiciary Discord and ping me when you arrive.

 

[End]

• The Defense has yet to amend their complaint. Discovery has been ended for a few days, which means that the Plaintiff is probably entitled under Rule 3.6 to a default judgement at this time. In light of that rule, the Plaintiff requests a default judgment against the defendant for failure to submit defense. If a default judgement granted would not be against the defendant on all claims, the Plaintiff would like to proceed to witness testimony, as we believe testimony could assist us in proving certain claims in this case.

What is outstanding? You have amended your complaint an unreasonable amount of times it is hard to keep up.

 

[End]

@Franciscus

 

[End]

@Franciscus

 

[ameslap]

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76
SUBPOENAS

@dearev, @MysticPhunky, @lawanoesepr, @Dogeington, and @End are ORDERED TO PROVIDE the documents described by the attached quote. Apologies for the brevity.

Reminder for @dearev specifically: you have the right to plead the fifth instead of providing any requested information. For your convenience, the fifth right states, "Every citizen has the right to not produce self-incriminating evidence in any situation. In criminal matters, no adverse inferences may be made from this right being exercised, specifically such that the exercise of this right in itself shall not be weighted when determining a verdict in criminal Court."

@MysticPhunky, you were asked to provide the documents described by the quote. You have 12 hours to submit to the court or be found in contempt.

@lawanoesepr, you were asked to appear in the Judiciary Discord to provide the documents described by the quote (something you requested). You have 12 hours to submit to the court or be found in contempt.

 

[ameslap]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY

Your Honor,

The Defense has posted a vociferous and lengthy objection to the Plaintiff's amendment to the complaint. For convenience, that objection is included below.



That the Commonwealth's counsel did not object to the amendments to complaint is plainly false. And it would beggar belief for the Commonwealth's counsel to claim that they did not object to the amendments to complaint.

Did the Commonwealth's counsel knowingly provide the information that "[t]he defence has not objected to this"? Indeed he did: xEndeavour posted the very quoted objection.

As per the Criminal Code Act, perjury occurs when an individual "knowingly provides false testimony in a court of law". As xEndeavour's claim was false, and xEndeavour knew the claim to be false, the Plaintiff asks that xEndeavour's false statements be stricken and asks that the Court consider that xEndeavour be charged 1 count with perjury in this instance.

Granted.End is charged with 1 count of perjury and will pay a fine of $5,000.

 

[ameslap]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY

Your Honor:

Commonwealth counsel xEndeavour has stated that "[c]ourt rules dictate that opening statements should be made at the start of the case". But this is not true, and it is not reasonable under the Court Rules.

The order of court proceedings is laid out quite explicitly in an easy-to-understand table. In Civil Proceedings, a lawsuit is filed, then an answer to complaint is given, and then discovery occurs. Only after discovery closes are opening statements given.

There is no reconciling xEndeavour's statements here; even if xEndeavour were to be referring to the initial complaint, Court Rule 3.3 explicitly allows for amendments to be made to a complaint ("[a]t anytime during the course of discovery, the plaintiff (or prosecution) may amend their Complaint").

The Plaintiff asks that xEndeavour be charged with perjury for this knowingly and demonstrably false statement. As a former Supreme Court Justice, there is simply no excuse here.

Denied. This court will give some grace that it was an honest mistake.

 

[MysticPhunky]

Your Honor, what are the documents i need to provide? i would also like to request to not be part of this case as the user "YeetGlazer" has been harassing me and has been punished by staff.

i would also like to how you think i am related to this, as i took no part in whatever this case is about.

 

[ameslap]

Your Honor, what are the documents i need to provide? i would also like to request to not be part of this case as the user "YeetGlazer" has been harassing me and has been punished by staff.

i would also like to how you think i am related to this, as i took no part in whatever this case is about.

Motion​

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff seeks a subpoena to personally compel MysticPhunky to produce the following items for discovery, and for the following reasons:

1. Any messages (including timestamps and full metadata) sent to or received by MysticPhunky anywhere on Discord between the time of 11:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time on 24 July 2025 and the time of the filing of the Defense's initial Answer to Complaint that reference (directly or indirectly) or pertain to any eviction, auction, sale, or transfer of any property described in the Plaintiff's initial complaint.
   1. The Plaintiff seeks to discover if MysticPhunky, who opened at least one eviction auction for these plots (see: Exhibit P-014), had reason to believe or otherwise knew that any evictions, auctions, sales, or transfers of any of the Plots were improper. The Plaintiff requests communications regarding these plots as such.

Here is what was asked to be provided. In light of your brief, this is optional to you, provide it if you wish.

 

[End]

Your honour, requesting that you compel the plaintiff to reply to the Defence’s request for information in relation to:

• The Defense has yet to amend their complaint. Discovery has been ended for a few days, which means that the Plaintiff is probably entitled under Rule 3.6 to a default judgement at this time. In light of that rule, the Plaintiff requests a default judgment against the defendant for failure to submit defense. If a default judgement granted would not be against the defendant on all claims, the Plaintiff would like to proceed to witness testimony, as we believe testimony could assist us in proving certain claims in this case.

What is outstanding? You have amended your complaint an unreasonable amount of times it is hard to keep up.

The defence asked for this on Monday and has since pinged the plaintiff several times to no response.

The plaintiff is clearly aware of the happenings of the case as they have been giving interviews to the media about the happenings of the case.

The defence is happy to answer to the plaintiff’s claims, however, noting that they have changed several times we would like clarification on what remains unanswered.

 

[Franciscus]

Your honour, requesting that you compel the plaintiff to reply to the Defence’s request for information in relation to:



The defence asked for this on Monday and has since pinged the plaintiff several times to no response.

The plaintiff is clearly aware of the happenings of the case as they have been giving interviews to the media about the happenings of the case.

The defence is happy to answer to the plaintiff’s claims, however, noting that they have changed several times we would like clarification on what remains unanswered.

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE CONMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE

Your honor:

Any competent attorney—which former Supreme Court Justice (and acting Chief Justice) xEndeavour is—may read the amended complaint, read the answer to complaint, and see what factual allegations are not addressed. The differences are plain and obvious to any attorney who wishes to the basic legwork expected of them, and xEndeavour is now grasping at straws for having failed to do that as a special prosecutor.

xEndeavour has chosen not to do this, but has has repeatedly pinged the Plaintiff in a bid to make the Plaintiff do his own work. The Plaintiff is not obligated to answer random pings by opposing counsel nor to do the opposing counsel’s work for them.

For these reasons xEndeavour’s repeated demands of the Plaintiff after recess was granted were both unreasonable and out-of-turn — he therefore breached procedure once again, as he has done repeatedly.

I ask that xEndeavour be given a verbal reprimand and that his comments and pings directed at the Plaintiff following the start of recess be stricken.

 

[End]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE CONMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE

Your honor:

Any competent attorney—which former Supreme Court Justice (and acting Chief Justice) xEndeavour is—may read the amended complaint, read the answer to complaint, and see what factual allegations are not addressed. The differences are plain and obvious to any attorney who wishes to the basic legwork expected of them, and xEndeavour is now grasping at straws for having failed to do that as a special prosecutor.

xEndeavour has chosen not to do this, but has has repeatedly pinged the Plaintiff in a bid to make the Plaintiff do his own work. The Plaintiff is not obligated to answer random pings by opposing counsel nor to do the opposing counsel’s work for them.

For these reasons xEndeavour’s repeated demands of the Plaintiff after recess was granted were both unreasonable and out-of-turn — he therefore breached procedure once again, as he has done repeatedly.

I ask that xEndeavour be given a verbal reprimand and that his comments and pings directed at the Plaintiff following the start of recess be stricken.

Simple request: what do you need an answer on?