Lawsuit: In Session The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Aezal [2023] FCR 34

RandomIntruder

Citizen
Secretary
Education Department
Commerce Department
Supporter
RandomIntruder
RandomIntruder
commercesec
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION



The Commonwealth of Redmont
Plaintiff

v.

Aezal
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

The Commonwealth Reserve Bank was created from the ashes of FINFA, tasked with the responsibility of keeping the economy of the Commonwealth stable. The Bank is chaired by a Reserve Governor who is in charge of running the institution as well as maintaining the in-game company that is used by the Reserve Bank. In reverse to what Spiderman once famously said, with such a big responsibility came big powers. These powers included the ability to deposit to, withdraw from, and even to disband the company and ordering for money to be created out of thin air through minting processes.

There are precautions in place. The Governor of the Reserve Board must be appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Additionally, any transaction by the Reserve that involved money over $200,000 in a single month must be done with the President’s approval.

However, these precautions are only written in law, and should a Governor choose to no longer be governed by the law, they still have the ability that comes with the position, but none of the checks and balances to stop them. The law is only as restrictive as the Governor chooses it to be.

On March 16, 2023, the Defendant, who was at the time the Governor of the Commonwealth Reserve Bank, decided to quit the server and therefore, his role as the Governor. However, in doing so, he took all the money from the Commonwealth Reserve Bank account out of the company and spent approximately $500,000 of it on various chestshops and used /pay to distribute the money to various players.

This is a violation of Aezal’s duty as the Reserve Governor and the funds, which was government money, was improperly used. Additionally, the amount that was distributed, $500,000, surpassed the monthly limit that should have needed to be pre-approved by the President.This is a clear misuse of their power as the Reserve governor and fits under the Commonwealth’s definition of Corruption, which currently reads as “The act of using a government position to act to give some advantage inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others to unfairly benefit oneself, or someone else.” Aezal used his government position as Reserve Governor to unfairly benefit someone else, the recipients of the money. Additionally, introducing such a large amount of money suddenly to the economy both causes public panic as well as exposing the Commonwealth to unnecessary inflation in the coming months. This therefore qualifies Aezal’s crimes as Treason using the definition which states “The act of a party in federal office who is caught attempting to maliciously sabotage or undermine the stability, sovereignty, and/or national security of the government of Redmont” since their actions undermines the stability of the government of Remont by removing large portions of government money and distributing it to the populus illegally.

I. PARTIES

1. Commonwealth of Redmont
2. Fmr. Governor Aezal
3. Commonwealth Reserve Bank

II. FACTS
1. Aezal was the Governor of the Commonwealth Reserve Bank
2. Aezal had an in-game company registered to their name which held the funds for the Reserve.
3. Aezal withdrew large sums of money on the 16th of March from the in-game company account.
4. They confessed, through a government announcement, to having “stimulated the economy” with $~500,000 from the Reserve account.
5. This was done without a majority vote by the Reserve Board.
6. They resigned as the Reserve Governor in the same announcement.
7. The Commonwealth Reserve Act states that the duty of the Reserve is to do its best to support the stability of the currency of Redmont as well as ensure economic prosperity.
8. The Constitution of the CRB states that the determination of Redmont Fiscal Policy must be approved by the Reserve Board with a majority vote.
9. The Commonwealth Reserve Act section 12 states that “(1) The President must give written approval for any of the following monetary policy changes to be enacted:
(a) Minting, introducing, and distributing currency amounts exceeding a total of $200,000 in any given month.”

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:

1. 1 Count of Corruption
2. 1 Count of Treason

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. For Corruption: Removal from public office and disbarment from public office for a period of 2 months and $25,000 in fines.
2. For Treason: Removal from public office and disbarment from public office for a period of 2 months and $25,000 in fines.
3. For the money to be seized from the recipients of the illegal distribution through a collaboration between the DLA, DOJ, and necessary staff and placed in the care of the DCGovernment account.

V. EVIDENCE

[Exhibit A: Announcement of Mass Distribution]
nNbzqOHwB-x9PskYDwX9CuwWk6zd_4k0Z0C6Wzy4EONLvF1R9_mohS39Hdh-RQMLJZeL1KYy0f7f5_8diLzQwmqQFqA0v0-cYbK8e6ps0qjE-GLYZt1cuddJs8nnq5VyDBfaSvwlJcXmDkhMAm1oDT8


[Exhibit B: Public Confession of Wrongdoing]
NuSP76AUyR0cTuofca0LR7MYZ1AkCEGaSUw8SINu0BOwTVfC8ZzGKLftK77zSmKdJwLAvmTA30S9oSxPkEE6YpeyAe9W9IQ9V2nqVGNg_KpFCZifOt8YmxPch1uTFCmKW66KY4nMwUSYksEcHwVhlb0


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 17th day of March 2023
 

JoeGamer

Justice
Justice
Supporter
JoeGamer
JoeGamer
judge
Before issuing a summons, the forums show RandomIntruder to not be a member of the Department of Legal Affairs. Would the prosecution please provide proof that the Attorney General has allowed you to prosecute this case or some proof of employment.
 

JoeGamer

Justice
Justice
Supporter
JoeGamer
JoeGamer
judge
federal-court-png.12082


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

Aezal is required to appear before the court in the case of the Commonwealth of Redmont v. Aezal. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

I'd also like to remind both parties to be aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​
 

RandomIntruder

Citizen
Secretary
Education Department
Commerce Department
Supporter
RandomIntruder
RandomIntruder
commercesec
You honor, I received more evidence for this case through a warrant after the filing. Would I be able to add those pieces of evidence to this case?
 

Dartanman

Citizen
Dartanman
Dartanman
attorney
Good day, your honor. It is my pleasure to be representing Aezal in this case.
1679426406857.png


I will be making another filing shortly.
 

Dartanman

Citizen
Dartanman
Dartanman
attorney
OBJECTION
Breach of Procedure | Point of Law

The Constitution is clear:
"IX. Any citizen, has the right to an attorney for a speed and fair trial. Any citizen, criminal or otherwise will have the right to a speedy and fair trial presided over by an impartial Judge, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, and to be confronted with the evidence against them, and to have the assistance of counsel for their defense." [portions bolded for emphasis]

Your honor, your recent instruction to the Prosecution is unconstitutional, as it makes this trial unfair by refusing to allow the Defendant to fully understand the nature and cause of the accusation, and even more strongly, does not grant my client the right to be confronted with the evidence against them.

It is unfair and unconstitutional for the Defense to be required to respond to the complaint until we have been confronted with the aforementioned evidence.
 

Dartanman

Citizen
Dartanman
Dartanman
attorney
You will be able to file that evidence after the defendant has made an answer to complaint.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER

In the event that the above Objection is overruled due to the objection being made against the presiding judicial's decision, a Motion to Reconsider the decision is also being filed:

I. MOTION TO RECONSIDER
The Constitution is clear:
"IX. Any citizen, has the right to an attorney for a speed and fair trial. Any citizen, criminal or otherwise will have the right to a speedy and fair trial presided over by an impartial Judge, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, and to be confronted with the evidence against them, and to have the assistance of counsel for their defense." [portions bolded for emphasis]

Your honor, your recent instruction to the Prosecution is unconstitutional, as it makes this trial unfair by refusing to allow the Defendant to fully understand the nature and cause of the accusation, and even more strongly, does not grant my client the right to be confronted with the evidence against them.

It is unfair and unconstitutional for the Defense to be required to respond to the complaint until we have been confronted with the aforementioned evidence.

The Defense requests you allow the evidence to be provided before responding to the complaint. Additionally, the Defense requests an extension to file an Answer to Complaint 48 hours after the evidence is provided.

Thank you, your honor.
 

Dartanman

Citizen
Dartanman
Dartanman
attorney
Additionally, I have an exam and a job interview tomorrow, so if the previous extension is not allowed, I do request only an extra 12 hours after the original deadline to file a response.

Thank you, your honor.
 

JoeGamer

Justice
Justice
Supporter
JoeGamer
JoeGamer
judge
OBJECTION
Breach of Procedure | Point of Law

The Constitution is clear:
"IX. Any citizen, has the right to an attorney for a speed and fair trial. Any citizen, criminal or otherwise will have the right to a speedy and fair trial presided over by an impartial Judge, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, and to be confronted with the evidence against them, and to have the assistance of counsel for their defense." [portions bolded for emphasis]

Your honor, your recent instruction to the Prosecution is unconstitutional, as it makes this trial unfair by refusing to allow the Defendant to fully understand the nature and cause of the accusation, and even more strongly, does not grant my client the right to be confronted with the evidence against them.

It is unfair and unconstitutional for the Defense to be required to respond to the complaint until we have been confronted with the aforementioned evidence.
Sustained. The Prosecution may provide its additional evidence.

Additionally, I have an exam and a job interview tomorrow, so if the previous extension is not allowed, I do request only an extra 12 hours after the original deadline to file a response.

Thank you, your honor.
Extension granted.
 

RandomIntruder

Citizen
Secretary
Education Department
Commerce Department
Supporter
RandomIntruder
RandomIntruder
commercesec
After filing a warrant against the Defendant, we were able to obtain more evidence of corruption in the form of Aezal both using Government Money to buy items from chestshops, presumably for personal use, as well as paying people using /pay after withdrawing money from the CRB ingame company.

[Exhibit C]

Images of the Pay logs of Aezal, which totals up to $272,000. (not counting payment to Sec. RandomIntruder for payment to new CRB account.)

[Exhibit D]
1679463170571.png


[Exhibit E]
1679463227185.png


Raw Spreadsheet:

This shows that Aezal attempted to spend $272,000 + $327,023 - $130 = ~$598,893

$389,000 was sent to Sec. RandomIntruder to be put back into the CRB account.
 

RandomIntruder

Citizen
Secretary
Education Department
Commerce Department
Supporter
RandomIntruder
RandomIntruder
commercesec
I apologize for the edit and the deletion of the previously prematurely sent post. However, I am done presenting the new evidence.
 

Dartanman

Citizen
Dartanman
Dartanman
attorney
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your honor, the Prosecution has openly said that they have intentionally omitted some of Aezal's paylogs.

It is possible that the payment(s) made to Sec. RandomIntruder could be evidence showing a difference in how the money that was allegedly taken out of the CRB was used.

Thus, the Defense is asking the court to compel the Prosecution to share those logs as well.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:

RandomIntruder

Citizen
Secretary
Education Department
Commerce Department
Supporter
RandomIntruder
RandomIntruder
commercesec
Your honor, I messed up again on the link for Exhibit C (I've never shared an entire folder before).


Here is the link to all the payments, including the ones that were compelled in the motion. I apologize for the inconvenience.
 

Dartanman

Citizen
Dartanman
Dartanman
attorney
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. AFFIRM that Aezal was the Governor of the CRB.
2. AFFIRM that Aezal had an in-game company registered to their name which held the funds for the Reserve.
3. AFFIRM that Aezal withdrew large sums of money on the 16th of March from the in-game company account.
4. AFFIRM that Aezal explained through a Government announcement that he “stimulated the economy” with $~500,000 from the Reserve account.
5. AFFIRM that this was done without a majority vote by the Reserve Board.
6. AFFIRM that Aezal resigned as the Reserve Governor in the same announcement.
7. AFFIRM that the Commonwealth Reserve Act states that the duty of the Reserve is to do its best to support the stability of the currency of Redmont as well as ensure economic prosperity.
8. AFFIRM that the Constitution of the CRB states that the determination of Redmont Fiscal Policy must be approved by the Reserve Board with a majority vote.
9. AFFIRM that the Commonwealth Reserve Act section 12 states that “(1) The President must give written approval for any of the following monetary policy changes to be enacted:
(a) Minting, introducing, and distributing currency amounts exceeding a total of $200,000 in any given month.”

II. DEFENSES
1. The facts are not in question, and it seems even the legality of the actions are not in question, but the Defense unequivocally DENIES that these actions warrant a Corruption charge and a Treason charge.

That being said, such arguments belong in an Opening Statement, not an Answer to Complaint, so we will be waiting for that. We will state now that we do not wish to have Summary Judgment.

ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Exhibit 1 [CRB’s Constitution]: The Constitution of the CRB
 

JoeGamer

Justice
Justice
Supporter
JoeGamer
JoeGamer
judge
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your honor, the Prosecution has openly said that they have intentionally omitted some of Aezal's paylogs.

It is possible that the payment(s) made to Sec. RandomIntruder could be evidence showing a difference in how the money that was allegedly taken out of the CRB was used.

Thus, the Defense is asking the court to compel the Prosecution to share those logs as well.

Thank you.
Seeing as the prosecution has already fixed the evidence-sharing issue, I will be rejecting this motion due to the motion being moot.


The Court thanks the defendant's council for providing their answer to complaint. The Court will move into opening statements. The prosecution as 48 hours to provide the court with its opening statement.
 

RandomIntruder

Citizen
Secretary
Education Department
Commerce Department
Supporter
RandomIntruder
RandomIntruder
commercesec
Your honor, may I ask for a 48 hour extension due to irl commitments right now?
 

RandomIntruder

Citizen
Secretary
Education Department
Commerce Department
Supporter
RandomIntruder
RandomIntruder
commercesec
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT

The Commonwealth Reserve Bank is given great power within the Government. They’re the only institution in existence that can command for money to be created out of nothing and distributed to the economy. Because of the possible implications of such abilities, only the brightest economic minds in the Commonwealth are allowed to lead the institution as its governor.

Therefore, we, as a Commonwealth, should not take it lightly when a governor, leader of such a powerful institution, breaches their duty to the public and puts the economic state of the Commonwealth into a further state of distress.

The Commonwealth’s current definition of Corruption, as outlined in the Corruption and Espionage Act, states the following: The act of using a government position to act to give some advantage inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others to unfairly benefit oneself, or someone else. By applying, being appointed to, or being elected into a position in government, the player agrees to serve the server over themselves.

Whether Fmr. Governor Aezal is guilty of the crimes we are charging them with in this situation rests on answering three simple questions:

Was the Governor of the CRB a government position? The Governor of the CRB is undeniably a government position. The Governor needs to be nominated by the senate and confirmed by the Senate, same as any Cabinet position. The Commonwealth Reserve Act also states that the CRB is “an independent and self-governing Government institution,” leaving the Governor as a government leader.

Was the “unhinged stimmy” an action inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others? To answer this question, we must first identify the official duty of the CRB overall as well as the CRB Governor. The Commonwealth Reserve Act states that the Commonwealth Reserve Bank should try to preserve the stability of the currency of Redmont. However, by introducing close to half a million dollars into the economy, Aezal had destabilized the economy as the currency.

Additionally, what they did was illegal. The Commonwealth Reserve Act, through the Respect the President Act which amended it, declared that distributing more than $200,000 must be previously approved by the president. Aezal knew this because such motions had been brought before President Twixted earlier in his administration. Furthermore, such actions of distributing money should have been approved of by the Commonwealth Reserve Board, which did not happen.

Did the action unfairly benefit themself or others? Yes. Is it fair that certain people, at the judgment of the Fmr. Governor, received immense benefits from this illegal action while others didn’t? Is it fair that Aezal now has, unless they have redistributed outside of our knowledge, $159,000 worth of bank notes from Discover banking and over 6 stacks of netherite ingots and diamonds each? Is it fair that 99.9% of the money that they spent at chestshops, more than half of the redistributed wealth, were distributed to 4 companies? There is no way to argue that the actions were fair.

The Fmr. Governor may argue that he in good faith tried to help the economy, but the Prosecution would like you, your honor, to really consider this. Could an economic mind as advanced as Aezal’s really believe that dumping half a million dollars into an economy already ripe with inflation really be doing what is best for the stability of the economy? The Fmr. Governor had already done a stimulus check at the start of their time in the CRB. Why do this now instead of another stimulus? Why those specific people? Why those companies? There is nothing fair about these actions taken.

DATED: This 25th day of March 2023
 

RandomIntruder

Citizen
Secretary
Education Department
Commerce Department
Supporter
RandomIntruder
RandomIntruder
commercesec
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
INJUNCTION

The Commonwealth would like the courts to temporarily seize the following from Aezal temporarily:

$159,000 worth of written books from Discover Bank as distributed:
WrittenBook#WE: 34
WrittenBook#WF: 9
WrittenBook#WJ: 8
6 stacks of netherite ingots
64 beacons
5.5 stacks of diamond blocks

These are the items that were bought with the money obtained through the CRB through various chestshops. The items will be given back after the court case is finished should the court deem it right to do so. Removal from the economy reduces the amount of damage that can be caused by artificially inflating several markets.
 

Dartanman

Citizen
Dartanman
Dartanman
attorney
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO INJUNCTION REQUEST

The Defense holds that this injunction is both illegal and unnecessary, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. The Defendant threw out and/or randomly gave away all of the items listed above.

2. Even if the Defendant did still have those items, the injunction would be an unreasonable seizure, as the punishment for the alleged crimes is a total of $50,000 and some time barred from public office. If the Commonwealth or other entities, such as Discovery Bank, believe they are entitled to other relief, they must state so in a civil action.

Thank you.
 

JoeGamer

Justice
Justice
Supporter
JoeGamer
JoeGamer
judge
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
INJUNCTION

The Commonwealth would like the courts to temporarily seize the following from Aezal temporarily:

$159,000 worth of written books from Discover Bank as distributed:
WrittenBook#WE: 34
WrittenBook#WF: 9
WrittenBook#WJ: 8
6 stacks of netherite ingots
64 beacons
5.5 stacks of diamond blocks

These are the items that were bought with the money obtained through the CRB through various chestshops. The items will be given back after the court case is finished should the court deem it right to do so. Removal from the economy reduces the amount of damage that can be caused by artificially inflating several markets.
I will be rejecting this injunction on the basis that the Court still holds reasonable doubt whether these items are in possession of the defendant. If the prosecution can provide evidence that these items are still in possession of the defendant, the Court will allow for reconsideration.
 

Dartanman

Citizen
Dartanman
Dartanman
attorney
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

(Note: Opening Statement will be provided shortly, as an extension is not needed)

The Defense moves that this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges that this case is a violation of the Defendant's Constitutional rights.

Your honor, the Constitution states: "No citizen shall be tried or punished again for an offence regarding a single criminal act for which they have already been finally convicted or acquitted of, in accordance with the law." [emphasis added]

The Commonwealth Reserve Act states: "(3) Failure to follow [the CRB Constitution] by its members is to be dealt with warnings, and in severe cases removal from the Board either internally or through impeachment." [emphasis added]

Additionally, the CRB Constitution, which is recognized by the Commonwealth Reserve Act as law, states: "Punishments may be issued by the Reserve Governor."

Seeing that he had disobeyed the law, Aezal proceeded to do exactly as the law required, and internally removed himself from the board, using his power as Reserve Governor (a member of the Executive Branch) to fulfill his legal obligation to remove someone who committed a severe violation of the CRB Constitution.

To allow this case to be heard would set the precedent that the Department of Justice (the Executive Branch) can arrest someone and fine them, just for the Commonwealth to sue them again.

My client has already been punished for the actions that this case is suing for, and thus, the Commonwealth cannot sue for these actions, however, Aezal could appeal them if he desired.

Thank you.
 
Top