Lawsuit: Adjourned The Banking Clan v. westc [2023] FCR 46

[Dartanman]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

The Banking Clan/Overlordofpeonys (Solid Law Firm representing)
Plaintiff

v.

westc
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

The Defendant signed a contract to pay back a loan, and failed to follow through.

I. PARTIES
1. Overlordofpeonys
2. westc

II. FACTS
1. On March 1, 2023, westc agreed to a $15,000 loan with 10% monthly interest, to be paid back in two monthly payments of $9,000, followed by 12% monthly interest if extended beyond 2 months.
2. No payment has been received from westc.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. By not paying the Plaintiff back, the Defendant has committed Breach of Contract

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $19,000 to repay the loan + interest
2. $1500 in legal fees.

EVIDENCE
Exhibit A:

Contract

Exhibit B:

Acceptance of Contract

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 12th day of May 2023

 

[Dartanman]

I apologize, your honor. I forgot to include consent to represent:

 

[JoeGamer]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

Westc is required to appear before the court in the case of The Banking Clan v. Westc. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

I'd also like to remind both parties to be aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​

 

[Dartanman]

Your honor, it has been 96 hours.

 

[JoeGamer]

The case has entered into a default judgment. A final decision will be made in the up coming days.

 

[JoeGamer]

Verdict

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
The Banking Clan v. westc [2023] FCR 46

I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The defendant signed a contract for a loan taken from the plaintiff.
2. The defendant has failed to make due on his contract by failing to repay the loan in the contract.

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. Defendant failed to appear, default judgment.

III. THE COURT OPINION
Because the defendant has failed to appear, I am left with little choice but to rule in favor of the defendant. Based on all evidence available to the Court, the defendant has failed to meet his legal obligation with the contract signed between the plaintiff and the defendant. I see no reason not to alter any of the relief due to these facts.

IV. DECISION
The Federal Court hereby rules in favor of the plaintiff and grants full relief.

The Federal Court thanks all involved.