Lawsuit: Pending T04DS74 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 65

[ToadKing]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


T04DS74 (aka ToadKing)
Plaintiff

v.

Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

I was minding my own business when I was suddenly fired from the Department of Justice (DOJ) as a State Prosecutor. This termination came without any prior warning whatsoever. Throughout my entire tenure at the Department of Justice, I had never received any previous warnings for misconduct or performance issues. The sudden dismissal was completely unexpected and without justification, leaving me shocked and confused about the basis for my termination. This arbitrary action has caused me significant harm both financially and personally.

I. PARTIES
1. T04DS74
2. Gribble19 (Attorney General)
3. Commonwealth of Redmont

II. FACTS
1. On or about 16th May, 2025, Plaintiff was hired as a State Prosecutor by then Attorney General, Juniperfig, who actively recruited Plaintiff, stating: "I'd want you as a prosecutor [...] you would be a total asset." (P-001)
2. During Plaintiff's employment in May 2025, Plaintiff received total compensation of $7,836, paid in three instalments (P-003):

• $3,500 on 18th May
• $3,500 on 30th May
• $836 on 31st May

3. Throughout Plaintiff's tenure, Plaintiff provided exemplary service, including legal input in numerous cases and investigations for the DOJ.
4. Plaintiff successfully helped defend the Commonwealth in the case of MrFluffy2U94 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 58, demonstrating competent legal representation.
5. Plaintiff consistently recused from cases that would cause conflicts of interest.
6. Throughout the month of June 2025, Plaintiff performed duties as State Prosecutor but received no compensation from the Defendant.
7. On June 26, 2025, at approximately 19:10:59 (UTC+1), Plaintiff was terminated from employment by "Gribble19" stating only "DOJ » You have been fired as a State Prosecutor!"(P-002)
8. Plaintiff received no prior notice, warning, explanation, or opportunity to respond to any allegations or performance concerns.
9. Plaintiff was given no opportunity to understand the basis for termination or to defend against any charges.
10. The termination was sudden, unexplained, and conducted without due process.
11. The Attorney General has the sole power to hire/fire people within the DOJ.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
Unfair Dismissal:
1. Defendant's termination of Plaintiff constitutes unfair dismissal in violation of Section 13(1) of the Commercial Standards Act.
2. The termination was unjust as it failed to meet the criteria established in Section 13(1)(a)-(d), specifically failing to demonstrate financial necessity, detriment to business operations, or legitimate cause.
3. The summary dismissal without notice or explanation violates fundamental principles of fair employment practices.

Constitutional Violation:
4. Defendant's actions violated Plaintiff's constitutional rights under Section 32(13) of the Constitution, which guarantees: "Every citizen is equal before and under the law and has the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law without unfair discrimination"
5. The arbitrary and unexplained termination denied the Plaintiff due process and equal treatment under the law.
6. Defendant failed to afford Plaintiff the same procedural protections and fair treatment that would be expected for any government employee.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. Compensatory Damages: Payment of unpaid wages for June 2025 services as State Prosecutor, in an amount not less than the monthly equivalent of the May 2025 compensation.

2. Consequential Damages: Damages for Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont under Section 7(1)(III) of the Legal Damages Act, specifically for the loss of ability to practice law on behalf of the Commonwealth, capped at $50,000 as provided by law.

3. Punitive Damages: $100,000 in punitive damages under Section 5 of the Legal Damages Act for the DOJ's outrageous conduct in summarily terminating Plaintiff without warning, explanation, or due process, demonstrating a callous disregard for basic employment rights and constitutional protections.

4. A formal written apology from the Defendant, acknowledging the improper termination and violation of the Plaintiff's rights.

5. 30% legal fees as provided under Section 9 of the Legal Damages Act.

EVIDENCE:

Spoiler: P-001

Spoiler: P-002

Spoiler: P-003

WITNESSES:
1. Juniperfig
2. Gribble19

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 26th day of June 2025