Lawsuit: Pending ScaryHacker1 v. quickrip [2025] DCR 58

[nonMaciej]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

CIVIL ACTION





ScaryHacker1

Plaintiff



v.



quickrip

Defendant



COMPLAINT

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:



WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On 27th of May 2026 the Defendant, quickrip, and the Plaintiff, ScaryHacker1, reached a verbal agreement for the buy/sale of a golden drill. After the fulfillment of the agreement by the plaintiff, the defendant failed to perform their contractual obligation and has not interacted with the plaintiff since.



I. PARTIES

ScaryHacker1 - Plaintiff
quickrip - Defendant



II. FACTS

On May 27, 2026, the Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a legally binding verbal contract for the purchase and sale of one Golden Drill. The terms of the agreement were explicitly established as follows:

●Total Consideration: $10500

● Payment Structure: The Plaintiff agreed to pay 50% of the total price upfront. The remaining 50% was to be remitted upon the successful delivery of the Golden Drill to the Plaintiff.

● Performance: The Plaintiff successfully performed their initial contractual obligation by transferring $5250 to the Defendant on May 27, 2026.



III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

Following the receipt of the initial payment, the Defendant failed to fulfill the core obligation of the agreement, the delivery of the Golden Drill. Instead, the Defendant immediately vacated the area and has since failed to communicate or perform, thereby constituting a unilateral breach of contract.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:



1. $5250 in Compensatory Damages to recover losses paid to the defendant

2. $1500 in Punitivate Damges for outrageous conduct under the RCCA

3. 30% of the total awarded damages in legal fees



Evidence: Untitled - Clipped Minecraft with Medal.tv



By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.



DATED: This 27 of May 2026

 

[nonMaciej]

Proof of Representation:

 

[Franciscus]

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE — ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

The Federal Court, upon reviewing this filing, sees that this appears to be a minor civil case with damages of under $120,000 sought. Such cases would be in the original jurisdiction of the District Court (see: Const. 16(1)(e)).

The Federal Court is thus contemplating whether or not to remand this case to the District Court. We wish to seek further information from Plaintiff in order to further develop the record of this case before issuing the contemplated remand. To do this, we issue this Order to Show Cause (see: RoFC, Section 10).

Within 48 hours, Plaintiff shall brief the Court in response to the following question(s):

1. What Court has original jurisdiction over this case?
2. Why does the Court identified in the answer to the first question have original jurisdiction over this case?

Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause within 48 hours of the time of this post shall result in a Contempt of Court charge.

In the Federal Court,
Hon. Judge Multiman155

 

[nonMaciej]

I respectfully acknowledge the Court's guidance regarding the proper jurisdiction for this civil action. I am prepared to comply with the Court’s decision to remand this case to the District Court to ensure the matter is handled in the appropriate forum.

I apologize for the inconvenience. It was my mistake, and I will be more careful about filing with the correct court in the future.

 

[Franciscus]

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER - REMOVAL OF CASE FROM THE FEDERAL COURT

The Federal Court finds that original jurisdiction for this case lies in the District Court. The Court REMOVES this case from our docket and places the case on the docket of the District Court for proper consideration in a Court that has original jurisdiction to hear it.

In the Federal Court,
Hon. Judge Multiman155