- Joined
- Aug 21, 2025
- Messages
- 365
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
RiggoSoft
Plaintiff
v.
Department of Commerce
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The plaintiff complains against the defendant as follows
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM PLAINTIFF
I. Parties
1. RiggoSoft
2. Department of Commerce
II. Facts
1. On July 24th 2026, the plaintiff submits the Psi Theta Inc corporation for registration with the Department of Commerce (P-01) as required by law with the attached formation document (P-02)
2. On July 30th 2026, the plaintiff submits the Alpha Chi Delta Fraternity Inc. corporation for registration with the Department of Commerce (P-03) as required by law with the attached formation document (P-04)
3. On July 30th 2026, Musclebound, a complaince officer for the Department of Commerce, responds underneath the Alpha Chi Delta Fraternity Inc. corporation request linking the business incorporation policy and telling the plaintiff to "fix" their formation instrument (P-03)
4. On July 30th 2026, the plaintiff responds to Musclebound informing them that the plaintiff is not required to abide by the business incorporation policy siting a previous corporation registration the plaintiff had with the Department of Commerce where the plaintiff had the same issues and the Department of Commerce eventually agreed with the plaintiff that abiding by the policy was not required for incorporation. (Message P-05, Previous Event P-06)
5. On July 30th 2026, Musclebound responds asking for information regarding one of the incorporators of Alpha Chi Delta and also what the DOJ & DOC attorneys concluded following the last incident mentioned in fact 4. (P-07)
6. On July 30th 2026, the defendant responds to Musclebound with the information he had requested. (P-08)
7. On August 1st 2026, the Department of Commerce responds to the Psi Theta Inc. corporation request linking the business incorporation policy and telling the plaintiff to ammend the formation document attached on the registration. (P-09)
8. On August 2nd 2026, the plaintiff opens a ticket with the Department of Justice asking for clarification of if the registration document had not correctly followed the Legal Entity Act as required by law. (P-10)
9. On August 4th 2026, Planke Fontaine (Planke32 on forums) responds to the plaintiff's ticket on behalf of the Department of Commerce, after being added to the ticket by a member of the DOJ, telling them to "Treat the optional requirements as optional, i shall have the policy updated to reflect this in due time" (P-10)
10. On August 4th 2026, the plaintiff responds with "So my corp is fine?" (P-10)
11. On August 4th 2026, Planke Fontaine (Planke32 on forums) responds to the plaintiff with "if the required provisions are there and compliant yes. I havnt thoroughly looked at it personally." (P-10)
12. On August 4th 2026, the plaintiff responds back with "Yeah they are they are what’s required in the LEA" (P-10)
13. On August 4th 2026, after an additional message by the plaintiff apologizing for the comotion broughten on by the plaintiff to the DOC and their employees, Planke Fontaine (Planke32 on forums) sends "allow muscle to see this and confirm hes seen it and then you can close" (P-10)
14. On August 4th 2026, Musclebound replies with "word" and the ticket is closed (P-10)
15. On August 7th 2026, the plaintiff creates a ticket with the Department of Commerce asking when their corporations will be approved (P-11)
16. On August 11th 2026, after discussion between the plaintiff and another employee of the Department of Commerce, fickogames responds to the plaintiff with "I read trough the document and it seems many vital parts are missing per DOC regulation,I will point out the DOC regulation is for your own sake, as the document you have put cannot be changed or altered legaly, it cannot be disolved, nor is there any legal liability protection." (P-11)
17. On August 11th 2026, the plaintiff responds with "Yeah I know DOC regulation isn’t law that was the whole point of the transcripts I attached so I don’t have to follow it I only have to follow the LEA which I did" (P-11)
18. As of August 13th 2026, neither corporation have been accepted (P-01 & P-03)
III. Claims for Relief
Count #1 Tortious Interference with Business Relations (Part X, Section 3 of the Redmont Civil Code Act)
As seen in facts 3,5,16, and 18 the defendant has intentionally and unlawfully interfiered with the plaintiff's prospective business dealings.
By unlawfully requesting the Alpha Chi Delta Fraternity Inc. formation document be ammended to abide by a non required business incorporation policy published by the defendant, the defandant has not permitted the plaintiff to conduct business on behalf of Alpha Chi Delta Fraternity Inc. which has not allowed the plaintiff or the plaintiff's prospective company to make money which has caused economic harm to both the plaintiff and their prespective company.
Count #2 Tortious Interference with Business Relations (Part X, Section 3 of the Redmont Civil Code Act)
As seen in facts 7,16, and 18 the defendant has intentionally and unlawfully interfiered with the plaintiff's prospective business dealings.
By unlawfully requesting the Psi Theta Inc. formation document be ammended to abide by a non required business incorporation policy published by the defendant, the defandant has not permitted the plaintiff to conduct business on behalf of Alpha Chi Delta Fraternity Inc. which has not allowed the plaintiff or the plaintiff's prospective company to make money which has caused economic harm to both the plaintiff and their prespective company.
IV. Prayers for Relief
1. For count #1, the plaintiff asks for the court to officially reconginze and approve the Alpha Chi Delta Fratenity Incorporation
2. For count #1, the plaintiff asks for the court to award the plaintiff $35,000 in compensatory damages for the plaintiff and their corporations loss of earning capacity during the time they were not allowed to conduct business.
3. For count #1, in the event that both prayer 2 is denied the plaintiff asks the court to award the plaintiff $7,500 for nominal damages.
4. For count #2, the plaintiff asks for the court to officially reconginze and approve the Psi Theta Incorporation
5. For count #2, the plaintiff asks for the court to award the plaintiff $35,000 in compensatory damages for the plaintiff and their corporations loss of earning capacity during the time they were not allowed to conduct business.
6. For count #2, in the event that both prayer 2 is denied the plaintiff asks the court to award the plaintiff $7,500 for nominal damages.
7. For both counts #1 & #2, the plaintiff asks the court to order the Department of Commerce to restructure their business incorporation policy to reflect the legal requirements by the Legal Entity Act.
8. For both counts #1 & #2 the plaintiff asks the court to award the plaintiff 30% of all damages for legal fees.
Witnesses: Musclebound, Planke Fontaine, fickogames
Dated: This 13th day of August 2026
Evidence
Attached, Psi Theta Inc - Formation Document.pdf
Attached, Alpha Chi Delta Fraternity Inc - Formation Document.pdf
Attached, p-10.PDF
Attached, p-11.PDF