Lawsuit: Pending RealImza v. Culls [2025] DCR 75

B

BlueOtterRiver

Citizen
BlueRiverOtter
BlueRiverOtter
Barrister
Joined
Jul 1, 2025
Messages
25

Case Filing


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


RealImza (Talion & Partners Representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Culls
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On the 29th of September Culls stated in game chat that RealImza committed bribery and claimed he had “evidence” convincing many people in MC chat that the plaintiff both committed bribery and there was evidence to support thereof.
Click to expand...

I. PARTIES
1. RealImza
2. Culls

II. FACTS
1. On 9/29/25 the defendant accused RealImza of committing bribery in in-game chat claiming that he had evidence to support his claims. (P-001)
2. On 9/29/25 plaintiff’s counsel DMed Culls asking what evidence he had.
3. Culls responded claiming he had multiple witnesses, when counsel inquired as to what witnesses counsel had he responded, “JamesTheSlay”. (P-002)
4. Defendant then deleted his original message and responded that he would wait to get a lawyer (P-003)
5. At least one of the defendant’s primary witnesses (JamestheSlay) had a conflict of interest resulting in prior hostilities between him and RealImza (see his defamation lawsuit in [2025] DCR 62).
6. When a person claims that he has evidence to support a claim, it is a lie by omission to omit that such evidence is unreliable.
7. Harm was caused to the plaintiff’s reputation by convincing many people in MC chat (P-001) that the plaintiff committed bribery.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. On slander
As per the No More Defamation Act and the precedents [2025] FCR 5, and [2025] DCR 14 the standards of defamation require the following to be fulfilled
  1. The statement must be published
  2. The statement must have been false
  3. The statement must have caused harm
Requirement A is fulfilled as the accusations were made openly in minecraft chat
Requirement B is fulfilled as the accusation of bribery cannot be proved beyond a balance of probabilities with the evidence we have so far. Additionally the claim that he had “evidence” was basically a lie by omission as he did not mention how his evidence was unreliable. (Note: the defense is unaware at this time on whether Culls claimed JamesTheSlay as a witness to bribery based on solely his prior statements in general chat as seen in P-001 or other out of court testimony)
Requirement C is fulfilled as the rumor made by Culls had influenced many people in MC general chat.
Why should falsity by omission be akin to a false statement?
To hyperbole if a person said “I have evidence to support the fact that a person committed treason.” and the “evidence” was in reality the testimony of a random citizen then damages resulting from the accused reputational harm in a free and just democratic society should be warranted. It should be noted that in real life this is the reasoning behind libel by omission.

2. On Punitive Damages
The defense's attempt to delete evidence has caused unnecessary burden to the plantiff, as according to the LDA punitive damages may be awarded to a party for "outrageous conduct" given that Culls attempted to delete evidence the defense considers that this qualifies under the standards for outrageous conduct.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. 2000 (two thousand) dollars in punitive damages for the defendant’s attempt at deleting evidence
2. 20000 (twenty-thousand) dollars in humiliation damages for the defendant’s false accusation thereby causing reputational damages to the plaintiff
3. 30% of the damages in this case awarded to Talion & Partners in legal fees

Evidence:
P-001 (MC chat):
iqwd.png
P-002:
IMG_1285.PNG
P-003 (deletion of evidence):
IMG_1286.jpg
Witnesses:
JamesTheSlay

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 5th day of October, 2025

 

Attachments

  • IMG_1286.jpg
    IMG_1286.jpg
    111.5 KB · Views: 22
  • IMG_1285.PNG
    IMG_1285.PNG
    668.5 KB · Views: 19
  • iqwd.png
    iqwd.png
    120.5 KB · Views: 20
Last edited:

Writ of Summons

@Culls, is required to appear before the district Court in the case of RealImza v. Culls [2025] DCR 75

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
Present, Your Honor. I will be representing on behalf of MZLD.
 

Attachments

  • 2025-dcr-77-representation.png
    2025-dcr-77-representation.png
    37.4 KB · Views: 9

Answer to Complaint


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

RealImza
Plaintiff

v.

Culls
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

1. Defendant AFFIRMS paragraph 1 of the Complaint.
2. Defendant AFFIRMS paragraph 2 of the Complaint.
3. Defendant AFFIRMS paragraph 3 of the Complaint.
4. Defendant AFFIRMS paragraph 4 of the Complaint.
5. Defendant NEITHER AFFIRMS NOR DENIES paragraph 5 of the Complaint. Defendant does not understand why prior Court proceedings constitute a "conflict of interest." Defendant cannot identify the interests that are conflicting.
6. Defendant DENIES paragraph 6 of the Complaint.
7. Defendant DENIES paragraph 7 of the Complaint.

II. DEFENCES

Culls presents the following defences against the Complaint:

A. The allegations are true.
1. Defendant's allegations against RealImza are substantively true. Defendant refers to exhibits D-001 through D-004 which show a number of occasions when RealImza participated in (or attempted to participate in) bribery.

2. In D-001, RealImza states, "We need a /bribe command." In D-002, RealImza states they want to use that command to bribe a judicial officer.

3. In D-003 and D-004, RealImza further suggests bribing potential candidates for public office.

4. Further, Culls will testify that he saw Muggy21 attempt to bribe RealImza in /intl chat.

5. Every person—and especially those holding public office—must be held to account for their words. Defendant held RealImza to their words. And this Court should too.

B. Plaintiff misstates the law.
1. Plaintiff's legal conclusion at paragraph 6 of the Complaint is incorrect. There is no legal requirement to publish information relating to the subjective reliability of a source.

2. Ultimately, the question is not whether Defendant's sources are subjectively "unreliable", but rather whether the underlying allegation is true. The best (and only) way for Plaintiff's claims to be tested are for the substantive allegations (that is, whether RealImza participated in bribery) to be proved or disproved at trial.


D-001.png

D-002.png

D-003.png

D-004.png

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED the 7th day of October 2025.

 

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

A. Failure to state a claim.
The Defendant moves that the Court separately dismisses Plaintiff's first Prayer for Relief, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges that:

1. Plaintiff does not allege that Defendant’s conduct was "outrageous", nor is there any claim for relief relating to Defendant’s alleged "attempt at deleting evidence". Punitive damages can only be awarded for "outrageous" conduct. Plaintiff has not pleaded that any of Defendant's conduct was "outrageous".

2. Therefore, the first Prayer for Relief is insufficiently pleaded and should be dismissed under Rule 5.5 for failure to state a claim.

B. No Evidence of "Reasonable Reputational Harm".
The Defendant separately moves that the Court dismisses Plaintiff's second Prayer for Relief, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges that:

1. This Court held in Anthony_org v. Culls [2025] DCR 67 that a plaintiff bringing a defamation action must "provide sufficient evidence to show that reputational harm occurred" (following the Federal Court's precedent in Vernicia v. RylandW [2025] FCR 5). In JamesTheSlay v. RealImza [2025] DCR 62, this Court held that a plaintiff must prove "reasonable reputational harm" in support of their claim for damages.

2. Plaintiff has only presented a bare assertion of damages. How is the Court supposed to assess the quantum of damages when there is no evidence?

3. For that reason, Plaintiff’s second Prayer for Relief should be dismissed under Rule 2.2 following the JamesTheSlay case, or alternatively under Rule 5.5 following the Anthony_org case.

 
Last edited:
BrownBerry said:

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

A. Failure to state a claim.
The Defendant moves that the Court separately dismisses Plaintiff's first Prayer for Relief, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges that:

1. Plaintiff does not allege that Defendant’s conduct was "outrageous", nor is there any claim for relief relating to Defendant’s alleged "attempt at deleting evidence". Punitive damages can only be awarded for "outrageous" conduct. Plaintiff has not

2. Therefore, the first Prayer for Relief is insufficiently pleaded and should be dismissed under Rule 5.5 for failure to state a claim.

B. No Evidence of "Reasonable Reputational Harm".
The Defendant separately moves that the Court dismisses Plaintiff's second Prayer for Relief, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges that:

1. This Court held in Anthony_org v. Culls [2025] DCR 67 that a plaintiff bringing a defamation action must "provide sufficient evidence to show that reputational harm occurred" (following the Federal Court's precedent in Vernicia v. RylandW [2025] FCR 5). In JamesTheSlay v. RealImza [2025] DCR 62, this Court held that a plaintiff must prove "reasonable reputational harm" in support of their claim for damages.

2. Plaintiff has only presented a bare assertion of damages. How is the Court supposed to assess the quantum of damages when there is no evidence?

3. For that reason, Plaintiff’s second Prayer for Relief should be dismissed under Rule 2.2 following the JamesTheSlay case, or alternatively under Rule 5.5 following the Anthony_org case.

Click to expand...
Permission to respond to B in the motion to dismiss your honor?
 
May it please the court that the defense has updated its complaint to include a second claim.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top