- Joined
- Jul 1, 2025
- Messages
- 23
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
RealImza (Talion & Partners Representing)
Plaintiff
v.
Culls
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I. PARTIES
1. RealImza
2. Culls
II. FACTS
1. On 9/29/25 the defendant accused RealImza of committing bribery in in-game chat claiming that he had evidence to support his claims. (P-001)
2. On 9/29/25 plaintiff’s counsel DMed Culls asking what evidence he had.
3. Culls responded claiming he had multiple witnesses, when counsel inquired as to what witnesses counsel had he responded, “JamesTheSlay”. (P-002)
4. Defendant then deleted his original message and responded that he would wait to get a lawyer (P-003)
5. At least one of the defendant’s primary witnesses (JamestheSlay) had a conflict of interest resulting in prior hostilities between him and RealImza (see his defamation lawsuit in [2025] DCR 62).
6. When a person claims that he has evidence to support a claim, it is a lie by omission to omit that such evidence is unreliable.
7. Harm was caused to the plaintiff’s reputation by convincing many people in MC chat (P-001) that the plaintiff committed bribery.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. On slander
As per the No More Defamation Act and the precedents [2025] FCR 5, and [2025] DCR 14 the standards of defamation require the following to be fulfilled
- The statement must be published
- The statement must have been false
- The statement must have caused harm
Requirement B is fulfilled as the accusation of bribery cannot be proved beyond a balance of probabilities with the evidence we have so far. Additionally the claim that he had “evidence” was basically a lie by omission as he did not mention how his evidence was unreliable. (Note: the defense is unaware at this time on whether Culls claimed JamesTheSlay as a witness to bribery based on solely his prior statements in general chat as seen in P-001 or other out of court testimony)
Requirement C is fulfilled as the rumor made by Culls had influenced many people in MC general chat.
Why should falsity by omission be akin to a false statement?
To hyperbole if a person said “I have evidence to support the fact that a person committed treason.” and the “evidence” was in reality the testimony of a random citizen then damages resulting from the accused reputational harm in a free and just democratic society should be warranted. It should be noted that in real life this is the reasoning behind libel by omission.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. 2000 (two thousand) dollars in punitive damages for the defendant’s attempt at deleting evidence
2. 20000 (twenty-thousand) dollars in humiliation damages for the defendant’s false accusation thereby causing reputational damages to the plaintiff
3. 30% of the damages in this case awarded to Talion & Partners in legal fees
Evidence:
P-001 (MC chat):
JamesTheSlay
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 5th day of October, 2025
Attachments
Last edited:
