Lawsuit: In Session MysticPhunky v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 71

[Ediyto1]

Case Filing​

​

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT​

CIVIL ACTION


MysticPhunky (Represented by Justita Legal Group)
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

COMPLAINT​

Plaintiff, MysticPhunky, brings this action against the Defendant, the Commonwealth of Redmont, and respectfully alleges the following:
The Plaintiff, MysticPhunky, brings this action against the Commonwealth of Redmont, alleging violations of constitutional rights, unlawful detention, and misconduct by a law enforcement officer acting under government authority. On or about July 12, 2025, the Plaintiff was arrested by DHS Officer pricelessAgrari for a murder charge that was believed to be under dispute. The officer failed to verify whether the charge had been resolved or whether the Plaintiff posed a threat before proceeding with the arrest. The Plaintiff was given no hearing, was not informed of their rights, and was detained without due process. Additionally, the arresting officer used hostile and unprofessional language in public chat (“don’t get mad at him, bitch”) and later issued a threat via Discord (“I will let you have one chance to take back everything you said or I will sue you”). These actions violated the Plaintiff’s rights under the Redmont Constitution and related law, including: Section 32(9) – Right to a fair and speedy trial, Section 32(14) – Right to liberty and personal security, Section 32(15) – Protection from unreasonable detention, Section 32(17) – Right to be informed of the reason for arrest, Miranda Warning Act – Right to be informed of legal rights upon arrest. Plaintiff respectfully requests the Court award: A declaratory judgment that the Plaintiff’s rights were violated, $1,750 in statutory damages for unlawful detention, Reimbursement of fines or fees related to the charge, $15,000 in consequential damages for reputational harm and emotional distress, $7,500 in nominal damages if compensatory relief is denied, $15,000 in punitive damages for officer misconduct, 30% of total damages in legal fees and any further relief the Court deems just and proper

I. PARTIES​

1. Plaintiff – MysticPhunky, a private citizen of the Commonwealth of Redmont.
2. Defendant – The Commonwealth of Redmont, which regulates law enforcement and must uphold constitutional rights, including oversight of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

II. JURISDICTION​

This Court has original jurisdiction over cases alleging constitutional violations, including those under Sections 32(9), 32(14), 32(15), and 32(17) of the Redmont Constitution.

III. STATEMENT OF FACTS​

1. On July 12, 2025, Plaintiff was arrested by DHS Officer pricelessAgrari for “1× murder” despite a live dispute ticket or Plaintiff's good-faith belief in it.
2. The officer did not verify adjudication or ticket status before detaining Plaintiff, who posed no threat.
3. Plaintiff was not informed of the reason for arrest or provided a hearing violating fundamental aspects of procedural fairness.
4. The detention was prolonged and public, causing reputational damage and emotional distress.
5. Officer pricelessAgrari used insulting language (“don’t get mad at him, bitch”) during the incident. (See Exhibit A)
6. The Officer later threatened legal action via Discord: “I will let you have one chance to take back everything you said or I will sue you.”
7. Plaintiff was not advised of any rights upon arrest and received no statement of charges or an opportunity to contest the detention timely.

IV. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF​

Count I – Violation of Section 32(9)
Plaintiff was denied a speedy and fair trial, right to know the charge, to confront evidence, and to counsel.


Count II – Violation of Section 32(14)
Plaintiff’s liberty and security were unlawfully deprived without adherence to the principles of fundamental justice.


Count III – Violation of Section 32(15)
Plaintiff was unreasonably seized without probable cause or warrant.


Count IV – Violation of Section 32(17)
Plaintiff was not informed of any arrest reason, subpoena, or detention—contravening constitutional requirements.


Count V – Police Misconduct (Criminal Code, Part III §7)
Officer’s conduct—unjustifiable force, failure to read rights, and insulting language—amounts to misconduct.


Count VI – Deprivation of Liberty (Criminal Code, Part II §5)
Plaintiff’s confinement without legal justification constitutes deprivation of liberty.

V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF​

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests the following relief:

1. Declaratory judgment that Defendant violated Sections 32(9), 32(14), 32(15), and 32(17).
2. $10,000 consequential damages for emotional distress, reputational harm, and loss of liberty.
3. $7,500 punitive damages for Officer’s malicious and improper conduct.
4. $50-per-minute statutory damages for the time unlawfully spent in detention under the Standardized Criminal Code §4.2(c).
5. Order for policy reform requiring DHS to verify ticket adjudication and communicate charges and rights upon arrest.
6. Expungement of all records related to this arrest unless revalidated properly.
7. Legal fees in accordance with Court discretion.
8. Any additional relief that the Court deems just and proper.
9. 30% of the case value in legal fees.

VI. EVIDENCE​

The Plaintiff will rely on:

• Exhibit A: Screenshot of Officer’s hostile in-game chat (“don’t get mad at him, bitch”).
• Exhibit B: Discord message threatening lawsuit (“…one chance to take back…or I will sue you”).
• Exhibit C: In-game logs or screenshots showing dispute ticket and lack of adjudication.

Additional evidence will be provided as permitted during discovery.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 23 day of July, 2025

 

[ameslap]

Writ of Summons

@gribble19 or their representative is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of MysticPhunky v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] - FCR 71

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[gribble19]

Commonwealth is present, Your Honor.

 

[ameslap]

Commonwealth is present, Your Honor.

The Defense has 48 hours to submit their answer.

 

[gribble19]

Answer to Complaint

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

MysticPhunky
Plaintiff
v.

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The Defendant AFFIRMS that Plaintiff was arrested by DHS Officer pricelessAgrari for “1× murder” on July 12, 2025
2. The Defendant lacks information or knowledge to form a belief about the truth of there being a live dispute ticket or plaintiff's good-faith belief in it and therefore DENIES this.
3. The Defendant DENIES that the Plaintiff was not informed of the reason for arrest or provided a hearing violating fundamental aspects of procedural fairness.
4. The Defendant lacks information or knowledge to form a belief about the truth of the detention being prolonged and public, causing reputational damage and emotional distress and therefore DENIES this.
5. The Defendant AFFIRMS that pricelessAgrari used insulting language.
6. The Defendant lacks information or knowledge to form a belief about the truth of the insulting language being used during the incident and therefore DENIES this.
7. The Defendant DENIES that Plaintiff was not advised of any rights upon arrest and received no statement of charges or an opportunity to contest the detention timely.

II. DEFENCES
1. The Plaintiff has not shown any evidence of a ticket disputing the charge existing.
2. The Plaintiff has themselves submitted evidence that shows the Plaintiff being informed of the reason for the arrest, being read a statement of charges, and being advised of rights.
3. The Plaintiff was not given a trial because the crime in question was a summary crime, this is a reasonable limitation that is defined in law and is not a violation of Section 32.(9) of the Constitution.
4. Plaintiff was arrested for committing a crime, this is not a violation of the right to liberty and security as this is a reasonable limitation to the right of security that is defined in law.
5. There was probable cause to arrest the plaintiff, as Plaintiff had been found to be the killer in a murder investigation; See D-001.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 28th day of July 2025

Spoiler: D-001

 

[gribble19]

The Plaintiff was given no hearing, was not informed of their rights, and was detained without due process.

Plaintiff was not informed of the reason for arrest or provided a hearing violating fundamental aspects of procedural fairness.

Plaintiff was not advised of any rights upon arrest and received no statement of charges or an opportunity to contest the detention timely.

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY, PERJURY, PERJURY

Your Honor,
Plaintiff has committed three counts of Perjury.

Exhibit C, as provided by the Plaintiff in their Complaint, shows pricelessAgrari stating: "You have been charged with 1x Murder. You have the right to remain silent, anything you say or do can be used against you. If you wish to dispute this charge, please open a DHS ticket under #support."

It is easily established that Plaintiff is aware of this. Not only did the Plaintiff actively participate in the conversation in question, and even take a screenshot of it, the Plaintiff also chose to file it as evidence along with their Complaint.

In their Complaint, the Plaintiff first states under their written statement that "The Plaintiff ... was not informed of their rights". The Plaintiff was very obviously informed of their rights by pricelessAgrari in the statement shown in Exhibit C, namely: "You have the right to remain silent, anything you say or do can be used against you". Plaintiff thus knowingly lied under oath for the first time, and committed one count of Perjury.

In the facts submitted in their Complaint, Plaintiff also states that "Plaintiff was not advised of any rights upon arrest". Here Plaintiff once again states the exact same lie, knowingly lying under oath for the second time, and committing their second count of Perjury.

Finally, the Plaintiff states under the facts submitted in their Complaint that " Plaintiff was not informed of the reason for arrest". This too is a lie. In Exhibit C we see an employee of the DHS state to Plaintiff that "You have been charged with 1x Murder". Clearly informing Plaintiff of the reason for their arrest. This is the third lie told under oath by the Plaintiff, with which the Plaintiff committed their third count of Perjury.

The Defendant respectfully requests Plaintiff be charged with three counts of Perjury, and be sentenced to a total fine of $150,000 and a jail time of 180 minutes, the maximum penalty for three counts of Perjury; See Criminal Code Act III.1.

 

[ameslap]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY, PERJURY, PERJURY

Your Honor,
Plaintiff has committed three counts of Perjury.

Exhibit C, as provided by the Plaintiff in their Complaint, shows pricelessAgrari stating: "You have been charged with 1x Murder. You have the right to remain silent, anything you say or do can be used against you. If you wish to dispute this charge, please open a DHS ticket under #support."

It is easily established that Plaintiff is aware of this. Not only did the Plaintiff actively participate in the conversation in question, and even take a screenshot of it, the Plaintiff also chose to file it as evidence along with their Complaint.

In their Complaint, the Plaintiff first states under their written statement that "The Plaintiff ... was not informed of their rights". The Plaintiff was very obviously informed of their rights by pricelessAgrari in the statement shown in Exhibit C, namely: "You have the right to remain silent, anything you say or do can be used against you". Plaintiff thus knowingly lied under oath for the first time, and committed one count of Perjury.

In the facts submitted in their Complaint, Plaintiff also states that "Plaintiff was not advised of any rights upon arrest". Here Plaintiff once again states the exact same lie, knowingly lying under oath for the second time, and committing their second count of Perjury.

Finally, the Plaintiff states under the facts submitted in their Complaint that " Plaintiff was not informed of the reason for arrest". This too is a lie. In Exhibit C we see an employee of the DHS state to Plaintiff that "You have been charged with 1x Murder". Clearly informing Plaintiff of the reason for their arrest. This is the third lie told under oath by the Plaintiff, with which the Plaintiff committed their third count of Perjury.

The Defendant respectfully requests Plaintiff be charged with three counts of Perjury, and be sentenced to a total fine of $150,000 and a jail time of 180 minutes, the maximum penalty for three counts of Perjury; See Criminal Code Act III.1.

Denied. Perjury is now an indictment and not a summary act under the Criminal Code Act and as such only the DoJ may prosecute it.

 

[ameslap]

Discovery will now officially start and last for 5 days.

• Discovery may end early if both parties agrees;
• Please let the court know if you would like an in-game trial by the end of discovery.

 

[ameslap]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY, PERJURY, PERJURY

Your Honor,
Plaintiff has committed three counts of Perjury.

Exhibit C, as provided by the Plaintiff in their Complaint, shows pricelessAgrari stating: "You have been charged with 1x Murder. You have the right to remain silent, anything you say or do can be used against you. If you wish to dispute this charge, please open a DHS ticket under #support."

It is easily established that Plaintiff is aware of this. Not only did the Plaintiff actively participate in the conversation in question, and even take a screenshot of it, the Plaintiff also chose to file it as evidence along with their Complaint.

In their Complaint, the Plaintiff first states under their written statement that "The Plaintiff ... was not informed of their rights". The Plaintiff was very obviously informed of their rights by pricelessAgrari in the statement shown in Exhibit C, namely: "You have the right to remain silent, anything you say or do can be used against you". Plaintiff thus knowingly lied under oath for the first time, and committed one count of Perjury.

In the facts submitted in their Complaint, Plaintiff also states that "Plaintiff was not advised of any rights upon arrest". Here Plaintiff once again states the exact same lie, knowingly lying under oath for the second time, and committing their second count of Perjury.

Finally, the Plaintiff states under the facts submitted in their Complaint that " Plaintiff was not informed of the reason for arrest". This too is a lie. In Exhibit C we see an employee of the DHS state to Plaintiff that "You have been charged with 1x Murder". Clearly informing Plaintiff of the reason for their arrest. This is the third lie told under oath by the Plaintiff, with which the Plaintiff committed their third count of Perjury.

The Defendant respectfully requests Plaintiff be charged with three counts of Perjury, and be sentenced to a total fine of $150,000 and a jail time of 180 minutes, the maximum penalty for three counts of Perjury; See Criminal Code Act III.1.

Denied. Perjury is now an indictment and not a summary act under the Criminal Code Act and as such only the DoJ may prosecute it.

After conferring with the judiciary, it appears I was mistaken and I apologize. I will be striking my previous ruling on "Perjury, Perjury, Perjury" and will be re-ruling.

 

[ameslap]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY, PERJURY, PERJURY

Your Honor,
Plaintiff has committed three counts of Perjury.

Exhibit C, as provided by the Plaintiff in their Complaint, shows pricelessAgrari stating: "You have been charged with 1x Murder. You have the right to remain silent, anything you say or do can be used against you. If you wish to dispute this charge, please open a DHS ticket under #support."

It is easily established that Plaintiff is aware of this. Not only did the Plaintiff actively participate in the conversation in question, and even take a screenshot of it, the Plaintiff also chose to file it as evidence along with their Complaint.

In their Complaint, the Plaintiff first states under their written statement that "The Plaintiff ... was not informed of their rights". The Plaintiff was very obviously informed of their rights by pricelessAgrari in the statement shown in Exhibit C, namely: "You have the right to remain silent, anything you say or do can be used against you". Plaintiff thus knowingly lied under oath for the first time, and committed one count of Perjury.

In the facts submitted in their Complaint, Plaintiff also states that "Plaintiff was not advised of any rights upon arrest". Here Plaintiff once again states the exact same lie, knowingly lying under oath for the second time, and committing their second count of Perjury.

Finally, the Plaintiff states under the facts submitted in their Complaint that " Plaintiff was not informed of the reason for arrest". This too is a lie. In Exhibit C we see an employee of the DHS state to Plaintiff that "You have been charged with 1x Murder". Clearly informing Plaintiff of the reason for their arrest. This is the third lie told under oath by the Plaintiff, with which the Plaintiff committed their third count of Perjury.

The Defendant respectfully requests Plaintiff be charged with three counts of Perjury, and be sentenced to a total fine of $150,000 and a jail time of 180 minutes, the maximum penalty for three counts of Perjury; See Criminal Code Act III.1.

I require a sidebar for this. Both parties please join the Judiciary Discord as soon as possible and make myself aware that you are there.