Lawsuit: Dismissed MrEntomology v. Pug_In_A_Burrito [2025] DCR 26

Status
Not open for further replies.
Imza

Imza

Citizen
Oakridge Resident
5th Anniversary
RealImza
RealImza
Attorney
Joined
Mar 14, 2025
Messages
17

Case Filing


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

MrEntomology
Plaintiff

v.

Pug_In_A_Burrito
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

On The 5th of January 2025, the Plaintiff signed a contract with the Defendant (P-001), stating that the Plaintiff would provide the Defendant with $10,000 Redmontian Dollars, If the Defendant demolished and constructed a new building on the plot of R040.

However, the defendant has breached his end of the contract, going past the agreed end-date of 5 calendar weeks (35 days).

This outrageous conduct prompted the building of the Plaintiff standing for nearly a month. After which the Plaintiff himself demolished the building (P-002). This caused significant inconvenience to the Plaintiff.

I. PARTIES
1. MrEntomology (Plaintiff)
2. Pug_In_A_Burrito (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. On the 5th Of January 2025, The Plaintiff and Defendant signed a contract.
2. This contract stated that Plaintiff would pay the Defendant, So that the Defendant could demolish the building at the plot of R040, and construct a new one.
3. The Defendant willfully breached this contract, and has yet to begin work on the building.
4. This has caused the Plaintiff to go out and demolish the building himself.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Defendant committed a Breach Of Contract, Per the Contracts Act, as they have failed to begin the demolition of the building, nor begin the construction of the building.
2. The Plaintiff has had to use their own time to painstakingly demolish the building.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $8,000 in Consequential Damages, Because of the Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont.
2. $5,300 in Liquidated Damages, $100 a day, as per agreed on the contract.
3. $7,500 in Punitive Damages, so as to deter this outrageous act in the future.
4. $6,240 in Legal Fees, equal to %30 of the Value of Damages.
(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 4th day of April 2025


Images of the contract from in-game:
https://imgur.com/a/RUSrPiy
Image of the plot after being demolished by the Plaintiff:
2025-04-03_23.02.04.png

 

Writ of Summons



@Pug_In_A_Burrito is required to appear before the District Court in the case of MrEntomology v. Pug_In_A_Burrito.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
Plaintiff, please provide proof of representation.
 
Here it is your honor.

1743758781413.png
 

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

Your Honor, the 72-hours deadline has passed, yet the Defendant has failed to appear.

The Plaintiff moves for Default judgement, and respectfully requests that the court grant this motion and issue a verdict based on the known facts of this case.

 
I will be taking over this case. I am noting the motion for default judgment and will review to see if we need a public defender.
 
After reviewing this case, I have determined that it is eligible for a public defender. I have contacted their office and I am waiting on a public defender to be assigned before moving to discovery.
 

Answer to Complaint


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT


MrEntomology

Plaintiff


v.


Pug_In_A_Burrito

Defendant


I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

1. The defence neither affirms nor denies that the Contract was signed by the defendant OR that it was signed on the 5th of January 2025.

2. The defence affirms that the contract states that the Defendant, listed as “Builder”, was expected to demolish the building at R040, and construct a new one.

3. The defence denies that the defendant willfully breached a contract.

4. The defence denies that this caused the plaintiff to demolish the building themselves.


II. DEFENCES

1. It is not clear that the contract was signed by the defendant.

2. It is not clear whether or not the contract was signed at all.

3. It is not clear when the contract was written, and P-1 suggests the images were taken recently.

4. The contract was between an entity named as “Brightside Con.” and the plaintiff, not the plaintiff and the defendant. It has not been established that the defendant is liable for damages.

5. It is not clear who had demolished the building in question.

6. The contract states a flat $100 fee for Liquidated damages, not per-day.


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 12th day of April 2025

 
I'm sorry that this case got lost in the wayside a bit. We will now be moving to discovery.

Discovery will end in 120 hours. Discovery can be voluntarily ended or extended with both parties agreeing to do so. Please remember the following rules:

Rule 4.2 (Submission Required For Use)​

All material used in legal arguments must have either been included in the case prior to the submission. Material must have been included within the complaint, within the answer, within an amendment to a complaint, within an amendment to an answer, or within a discovery submission. Otherwise the material will be deemed inadmissible and the argument can be voided by the presiding judge.

Rule 4.9 (Witness Protocol)​

A party may submit a list for witnesses at any time before the end of discovery. In order for a witness to be called during witness testimony, they must be announced under this rule, during discovery. Any witness may be objected to according to the objections laid out within rule 6.3.

Failure to adhere to the timelines of this rule may subject that party to a contempt of court charge at the presiding judge’s decision. The presiding judge shall include a warning regarding the timeline when summoning the witness.
 
We will now move to opening statements. The plaintiff shall have 72 hours to post their opening statement. When the plaintiff posts their opening statement (or fails too after 72 hours), the defendant shall have 72 hours to post their opening statement.
 
Your honour,

I am not a lawyer but my attorney has been radio silent with me.

He has also failed to respond to any of cases in which he should have for discovery and what not.

He has failed to do what I hired him for.
 
Opening statements will be stopped for now. @MrEntomology I am going to give you 72 hours to let me know if you wish to represent yourself or if you're hiring a new attorney.

@Imza you are to respond to this post within the next 72 hours to show-cause and explain why you are not doing your duties as a lawyer.
 
Your Honour,

I need to request that this case be dismissed without prejudice since I cannot get ahold of my attorney nor acquire a new one.

I am not on discord so it makes this process more difficult.
 
Dismissing this case without prejudice, though I am noting for the record that we made it to the "trial" phase of the case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top