Lawsuit: Adjourned Lexi7369 v. Gamemoding [2022] DCR 23

[Claxx77]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Lexi7369
Plaintiff

v.

Gamemoding
Defendant

COMPLAINT
In global, I asked if anyone was selling panda spawn eggs, and I'd offer $300, and Gamemoding said he'd do it. I then moved to msging him in private and I asked him to come to spawn, then it escalated. He began stalling, and he would say phrases such as, "I'm getting them" "there almost done" and he asked me to pay him first so he knew he wasn't being scammed, then I asked him to give me the eggs first so I knew I wasn't being scammed for money. He then asked again, so I paid him the $300. Then afterward, he never ended up giving me eggs.



I. PARTIES
1. Lexi7369
2. Gamemoding

II. FACTS
1. Lexi7369 offered $300 for 3 panda spawn eggs.
2. Gamemoding accepted this offer.
3. Lexi7369 asked Gamemoding to come to spawn to complete the transaction.
4. Lexi7369 paid the amount agreed before which is $300.
5. After payment, Gamemoding never ended up giving the eggs.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
10.1 - Fraud
A dishonest or illegal scheme of successfully obtaining or attempting to obtain something of value.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Refund of the payment done by Lexi7369 which is $300.
3. $150 In legal fees.

EVIDENCES
Chatlogs show that Lexi7369 paid the money and did not receive the eggs.

 

[Kanne]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

The defendant, @Gamemoding, is required to appear before the court in the case of the Lexi7369 v. Gamemoding. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff.

I'd also like to remind both parties to be aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​

 

[Kanne]

Verdict

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

VERDICT

Case [2022] DCR 23

I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION

1. The Defence, Gamemoding, after accepting the offer and receiving the $300 from the Plaintiff, did not deliver the three panda spawn eggs agreed upon.
2. The Plaintiff accuses the defence of a crime of fraud.

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION

1. Defendant did not appear before the court.

III. THE COURT OPINION

1. There is enough evidence that the defence never delivered the three panda spawn eggs.
2. The intentional omission to deliver the three panda eggs causes quantifiable damage to the Plaintiff. Consequently, we are facing the crime of fraud.

IV. DECISION

1. I am ruling a default judgement in favor of the Plaintiff. I hereby order the DOJ to fine the Defendant $450 and transfer that money to the Plaintiff, Lexi7369.

The District Court thanks all involved.