Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Uffizi Holdings [2025] FCR 46

[Kaiserin_]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION


Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Uffizi Holdings
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

The time has finally come for the first monopolisation case in Redmont’s history. Like a dragon hoarding ever-more gold, Uffizi Holdings, parent company of Volt Bank, has moved to swallow up nearly all remaining competition to the commercial banks that it owns. Through its subsidiaries, Uffizi now owns 3/4 of the viable interest-taking banks, and holds 2/3 of the liquid cash within those banks, totalling more than 5.5 million dollars, not even counting other non-liquid holdings. If ever there was a time where the term “disproportionately large amount of market share” would apply, this would undoubtedly be it. The Commonwealth calls upon the honourable court today to administer justice swiftly and with impunity to reverse this unholy corporate merger.

I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont
2. Uffizi Holdings
3. supersuperking (CEO & Chairman of Uffizi Holdings)

II. FACTS
1. On 13 May, Nexalin, former Chief Executive Officer of Vanguard Private Bank and Discover Bank, announced the divestiture of both banks to Volt, noting that "Volt has assumed all client deposits".
2. Volt is owned by Uffizi Holdings.
3. After the sale, if it is not halted, Uffizi Holdings would control three major banks within Redmont. Its only major competitors would be Voyager Bank, the Bank of Reveille, Dino Nuggie Bank, and Cobblestone Bank.
4. The Bank of Reveille is a no-interest bank, while Dino Nuggie Bank utilises bank notes, and Cobblestone Bank is a boutique bank offering service to a very small amount of high-income users, meaning all three of these banks operate in a markedly different space of the market than any bank owned or purchased by Uffizi Holdings.
5. The only remaining general major interest-taking bank following the sale of Vanguard Private Bank and Discover Bank to Volt will be Voyager Bank, which will serve as the sole competitor to Uffizi Holdings’s banks in the space they operate in within the market.
6. Volt Bank holds over double the amount of liquid cash as Voyager Bank following the transfer of all deposits from Vanguard Private Bank and Discover Bank.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. One charge of monopolization. Per the Commercial Standards Act, monopolization is “Any sort of deal wherein two or more businesses seek to merge into a single entity or owner-subsidiary relationship that controls a disproportionately large amount of market share in any particular market.”

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. A fine of ten thousand Redmont dollars charged to Uffizi Holdings.
2. Divestiture of Uffizi Holdings from Vanguard Private Bank and Discover Bank.

WITNESS LIST
1. Avaneesh2008 - Expert witness
2. AsexualDinosaur - Director of Bank of Reveille and owner of Dino Nuggie Bank
3. Nexalin - Former CEO of Vanguard Private Bank and Discover Bank
4. DonTrillions - Chairman of Volt Bank

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

Spoiler: P-001 - Vanguard's announcement of acquisition

Spoiler: P-002 - Volt's liquid holdings

Spoiler: P-003 - Voyager's liquid holdings

Spoiler: P-004 - Uffizi's announcement of acquisition

DATED: This 14th day of May, 2025

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

On May 13th, 2025, the former Chief Executive Officer of Discover Bank and Vanguard National Bank publicly announced their sale and divestiture to Volt. As part of the transaction, Volt has assumed all client deposits [P-001].

The Commonwealth respectfully moves this Court for emergency injunctive relief to prevent irreversible harm caused by the consolidation of these entities, which we contend form an illegal monopoly.

Accordingly, the Commonwealth requests that the Court grant the following relief:

• An immediate injunction halting the sale of Discover Bank and Vanguard National Bank to Uffizi Holdings or Volt;
• A stay on all transfers of client balances from Discover Bank and Vanguard National Bank to Volt;
• An order reversing any structural or financial changes already enacted as part of the merger.

 

[ko531]

Writ of Summons

@supersuperking is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. Uffizi Holdings [2025] FCR 46

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[ko531]

The Emergency Injunction is granted in order to prevent harm to client information, cash and for the companies in this case. If the consolidation were to continue it could prevent either Discovery or Vanguard and their customers to return back to what they were before.

 

[Kaiserin_]

Your honour, the Commonwealth has come to a plea bargain with the defendant. In exchange for a guilty plea, the prosecution will not be seeking the $10,000 fine as noted above.

 

[ko531]

The court accepts the plea deal and orders the divestiture of Uffizi Holdings from Vanguard Private Bank and Discover Bank.