Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. .sharkboy1217387 [2026] DCR 9

AmityBlamity

AmityBlamity

Citizen
Aventura Resident
Justice Department
Change Maker Popular in the Polls Legal Eagle 5th Anniversary
AmityBlamity
AmityBlamity
State Prosecutor
Joined
Jan 4, 2025
Messages
369

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION

Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

V.

.sharkboy1217387
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

.sharkboy1217387 sold at least two near-broken Elytras, omitting details regarding their condition to buyers, and thus engaging in the act of fraud.
Click to expand...


I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont (Prosecution)
2. .sharkboy1217387 (Defendant)

II. FACTS
  1. On 11/17/2025, .sharkboy1217387 advertised “come to spawn and [sic] but an elyta for $620 they have mending” (P-001)
  2. Vennefly told sharkboy they wanted to buy an Elytra (P-002).
  3. Sharkboy told Vennefly to “meet [them] at airport”.
  4. After Vennefly confirmed the price of $620, she paid Sharkboy.
  5. Sharkboy was then arrested for a seemingly unrelated manner. He assured Vennefly “don’t worry I dont scan”, “*scam”.
  6. After his release, Sharkboy told Vennefly to meet him at spawn (P-003).
  7. Sharkboy handed the Elytra to Vennefly, only for the latter to discover it was almost broken.
  8. Sharkboy defended his actions by saying it was “not fully broken” and “i never said it was fully durability”.
  9. After Vennefly accused this of being a scam, Sharkboy told Vennefly to “just go grind at a mob farm” and, in regards to the Elytra, claimed “not broken it had like 6 durability” (P-004).
  10. On 11/18/2025, DETECTIVHOLMES questioned another of Sharkboy’s victims, BleepBloopx (P-005).
  11. BleepBloopx testified that Sharkboy had said “no no i dont sell damaged elytras” to potential customers, after selling BleepBloopx an Elyta with “like 12 durability”.
  12. On 11/22/2025, DETECTIVHOLMES interrogated Sharkboy, who confessed to the fraudulent sales of elytra” (P-006).

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charge against the Defendant:
  • One count of Fraud. Per the Criminal Code Act, a person commits Fraud if they “knowingly or recklessly misrepresents or omits a material fact to another, causing the other party to rely on that misrepresentation”. .sharkboy1217387 knowingly withheld information concerning the shoddy quality of the Elytras in order to offload them to unsuspecting customers. By omitting the damage to these Elytras, and charging full price for them, Sharkboy delivered actual, quantifiable harm to his customers.
IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
  • 100 Penalty units and 10 minutes of imprisonment.

EVIDENCE:
P-001.png



P-004.png

P-005.png

P-006.png

WITNESSES:
Vennefly
BleepBloopx
DETECTIVHOLMES

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

Signed,
Prosecutor AmityBlamity

 
This is remanded to the DCR, the Court has original jurisdiction over cases involving more than 60 mins of jail time.
 

Writ of Summons

@.sharkboy1217387, is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. .sharkboy1217387 [2026] DCR 9

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

Objection


Breach of Procedure

Your Honour, the defendant has failed to appear. I request they be found in Contempt of Court, and either we proceed with default judgement, or a public defender be appointed.

 
AmityBlamity said:

Objection


Breach of Procedure

Your Honour, the defendant has failed to appear. I request they be found in Contempt of Court, and either we proceed with default judgement, or a public defender be appointed.

Click to expand...
Sustained. no contempt will be issued however a PD will be called.
 
I have assigned myself to this case as Public Defender.
 

Objection


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - HEARSAY

Your honour,
P-005 is inadmissible as it shows witness testimony without Defense counsel having the ability to respond to it.
I move for it to be struck following precedent set by Lawsuit: Adjourned - Unseatedduke1 v. The Radish [2024] DCR 26.

 

Objection


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - RELEVANCE

Your honour,
Unless opposing counsel can verify that the individual shown in P-006 is my client, I move for it to be struck.

 

Plea


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
PLEA

Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

.sharkboy1217387
Defendant

I. ENTRY OF PLEA
1. The Defense pleads guilty to one count of fraud.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This (day) day of (month) (year)

 
Your honour,
Additionally, I ask to be heard on sentencing.
 
Superwoops said:

Objection


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - RELEVANCE

Your honour,
Unless opposing counsel can verify that the individual shown in P-006 is my client, I move for it to be struck.

Click to expand...
Your Honour,

Please find attached a conversation from the marketplace channel in the DC Discord, where "Ron" confirms his player name is indeed .sharkboy1217387.

1769785619177.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top