- Joined
- Jun 15, 2025
- Messages
- 147
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
CatGuy666 (Represented by Maxib02)
v.
_ThatBritishGuy_
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I. PARTIES
1. CatGuy666 (Plaintiff)
2. _ThatBritishGuy_ (Defendant)
II. FACTS
1. On what the Plaintiff believes is the 20th of May 2026, the Plaintiff sends a message in chat asking if anyone was a mechanic, and after a very brief interaction with the Defendant, begins speaking to the Defendant, asking if they could craft something, stating that they had all the materials, and requesting the production of a Hood Ornament, after the Defendant asks "what you want" (P-01)
2. The defendant agrees to produce the 'Hood Ornament' after a brief interaction, confirming that they would do so with "Sure" (P-04). In addition and in general, in the context of this conversation, "Sure" should provide proof that an agreement was reached between the two parties, that the Defendant agreed to produce a 'Hood Ornament' for the Plaintiff, with payment not mentioned, requested or offered in regards to that agreement - which had been reached and confirmed.
3. The plaintiff asks the location of the Defendant (P-04), and the Defendant requests that the parties meet at Northern Spawn (Spawn North?) and the plaintiff travels to Northern Spawn (P-03, P-04).
4. After providing the materials, which consisted of Gold Cash and Diamond Blocks, to the defendant at Northern Spawn, which the Plaintiff knows where all the materials required to produce the desired item, the defendant either crafts the item or keeps the materials, and requests a payment of $500, 'for the service' (P-03).
5. The Plaintiff expresses confusion at the conduct of the Defendant, pointing out that "You did not tell me to pay". Payment had not been discussed, the Plaintiff did not expect to be charged for the service. The Plaintiff states that "this is kinda illegal" and "give me thing", before being informed by the system that 'No one can hear you...
', which shows the Defendant departed, or fled the scene - the location the parties had travelled too for what had been expected to be a simple exchange, without bothering to explain their conduct, reach agreement, or allow for further discussion that could've led to a compromise or the Defendant providing a reasonable reason (if such a thing existed!) for there dishonest and unreasonable behaviour (P-04).6. There was no mention of payment, request for payment, or suggestion or implication that the Plaintiff would pay someone, or the Defendant for crafting or producing a Hood Ornament, nor was there anything that would suggest or confirm that payment was to be expected or provided for the requested service (P-01, P-03, P-04), in any of the messages exchanged by the parties, or sent in chat by either of the Parties in the time the conversation(s) in question took place.
7. The Plaintiff had been very stressed and irritated by the situation, warned the Defendant multiple times, whilst they diligently explored their options, and after some time passes and has some relevant discussions with people present on the server at a later date.
8. The Plaintiff then contacts the defendant, informing them that "If you don't give me the items in this list: Hood Ornament! You will be sued for theft & loss of enjoyment! I have all evidence & lawyers contacted. The case can last up to several month. So just give item", and the defendant replies with "sounds fun, good luck with that" (P-05, P-06). The Plaintiff very reasonably gave the Defendant a final opportunity to live up to their word, and follow through with the agreement, but the Defendant has disregard for the what is both legal, and fair, has provided no reasonable, suitable explanation to why they either did not provide the requested item, the Hood Ornament, either intially or after the follow up from the Plaintiff, or alternatively provide a refund of the materials that the Plaintiff provided them with - with the expectation that a Hood Ornament would be produced and provided.
9. To summarise, the defendant agreed to craft the Hood Ornament without discussing payment beforehand, accepted the materials, and only afterwards did the Defendant demand payment.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. There was an understanding or agreement that the Defendant would provide the Plaintiff an item crafted from materials provided by the Plaintiff, no discussion, suggestion or implication that the Defendant would expect the Plaintiff to hold the requested item, the 'Hood Ornament' to ransom for an amount not previously discussed.
2. The Defendant actively refused to provide the Hood Ornament, or return the materials that would be used to craft the Hood Ornament, which we believe is tantamount to theft, but at the very least a breach of agreement, or an unjust enrichment at the cost of the Plaintiff.
3. The conduct of the Defendant is and has been outrageous.
4. An agreement has been breached.
5. In Addition, the acts of the Defendant would potentially be criminal offences, and be bordering on extortion, as per the Criminal Code Act
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $712.8 in Compensatory Damages
($712.8 is the total cost to replace the items 'stolen' or otherwise taken and not returned, that were provided by the plaintiff to craft the Hood Ornament - this calculated using median values from the April CPI data)
2. ALTERNATIVELY, the 'Hood Ornament' in lieu of Compensatory Damages (and only in lieu of the requested compensatory damages).
3. $1,500 in Punitive Damages for outrageous conduct.
(The conduct of the defendant was most outrageous, as well as being very rude and dismissive of valid, relatively polite requests made by the Plaintiff. They took advantage of the good nature of the Plaintiff, and furthermore engaged in dishonest dealings, by asking for payment only after request had been completed - when there was absolutely no prior warning or reason to think that would be the case)
4. $1,000 in Consequential Damages.
(Some loss of Enjoyment in Redmont has been caused by the actions of the defendant, which have caused some stress, but most importanly have been a waste of the plaintiffs time. Furthermore, the loss/non arrival of the Hood Ornament, which had been expected and highly sought after by the Defendant, has been an incredibly stressful scenario, somewhat of a humiliation, as well as an insult to their good person.
5. 2,000$ In Legal Fees paid to Maxib02 (Alternatively the legal minimum mandated by law).
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 22nd day of May 2026
Attachments
Last edited:
