Appeal: Denied Case No. 10-25- 2021

Status
Not open for further replies.

lawanoesepr

Citizen
Attorney General's Office
lawanoesepr
lawanoesepr
- Client Name: lawanoesepr
- Counsel Name: lawanoesepr
- Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant: Defendant
- Reason for the Appeal: The court did not take into account that this was opinion and not a fact. They also did not take into account that I did not knowingly make a false statement. The verdict says that no evidence was presented but I had presented an investigation report.
- Additional Information: I feel that my apology is unjust and feels like public shame I ask if appealed to remove the apology until case is adjourned
 

Wuutie

Citizen
Justice
Unfortunately, the Federal Court has decided to reject your appeal to re-consider Case No. 10-25-2021.

We believe that the ruling produced in the District Court was within the adequate scope of law and justice. This appellant has presented no new facts or evidence in this appeal but instead re-argued the same points from before.

The Federal Court believes that everything was taken into account as such the fact it was your opinion. An opinion can still hurt someone's reputation and this means slander.

The words you said seen in the evidence presented by the Plaintiff was done by your full knowing and still chose to pick those words. The Federal Court does not seem any wrongdoing by the District Court. The Investigation report is not a defense to use slandering words against another person.

Finally, the sentence put by the District Court is not too extravagant.

The Court thanks the appellant for their time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top