Lawsuit: Pending bradzb__ v. RRBuilders

[SoapMcKakashi]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Redix12YT (represented by Theory, Talion & Partners Inc.)
Plaintiff

v.

RRBuilders
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On July 29, 2026, Plaintiff purchased plot S058 for $165,000. Two days later, Plaintiff hired Brzzzes of RRBuilders to construct the interior of S058 for $26,000, paid 50% up front, with a turnaround of under five days. The plaintiff accepted a written contract and paid $18,000 up front — more than the agreed 50% — then transferred the plot to Brzzzes to begin work. The contract obligated Brzzzes to complete the build and to return S058 to Plaintiff immediately whenever requested. Plaintiff repeatedly requested proof of progress and access to the plot, which Brzzzes did not provide, and Brzzzes confirmed he would meet an August 22 deadline set by Plaintiff. From mid-August onward, Brzzzes stopped responding. On August 22, Plaintiff was unable to access S058 to prevent its eviction, and a final message the next day went unanswered. S058 was subsequently reassigned by the server's government and lost to Plaintiff entirely, resulting in the loss of the $165,000 paid for the plot and the $18,000 already paid toward work that was never completed.

I. PARTIES
1. Redix12YT aka bradzb__ and TheFlameEmperor1 (Plaintiff)
2. RRBuilders (Defendant)

II. FACTS

1. On July 29, 2026, Plaintiff purchased plot S058 for $165,000 from a player identified as "sandpoop," with title to S058 confirmed transferred to Plaintiff that same day. [P-012]
2. On July 31, 2026, Plaintiff contacted Defendant RRBuilders, operated by Brzzzes, through a support ticket requesting interior construction services for S058, consisting of a schematic-based structure measuring 39×29×165 blocks, with a specified floor-by-floor layout comprising a ground-floor restaurant, offices and chestshops, apartments, penthouses, and a personal residence at the top of the structure. [P-001]
3. Later that same day, Plaintiff and Defendant negotiated and agreed upon a total price of $26,000 for the work, to be paid as 50% upon commencement and the remaining 50% upon completion, with an agreed turnaround time of "under 5 days." [P-002]
4. Defendant subsequently confirmed the payment structure described in the preceding paragraph. [P-003]
5. On July 31, 2026, Defendant transmitted a written contract to Plaintiff titled "S058 Plot Transfer and Return Contract." [P-004]
6. Plaintiff confirmed acceptance of the written contract by replying "signed" in the parties' chat, and Defendant thereafter requested and received payment of $18,000 from Plaintiff — an amount exceeding the $13,000 that would have constituted 50% of the agreed $26,000 price. [P-005]
7. Later on July 31, 2026, Plaintiff transferred possession and title of plot S058 to Defendant to enable Defendant to perform the agreed construction work. [P-006]
8. The written contract identifies "TheFlameEmperor1" as Client and the Contractor as Brzzzes. The contract obligates the Contractor to design, construct, and complete the agreed structure, and further obligates the Contractor to return S058 to the Client "immediately and without condition" upon completion of the work or at any time the Client requests its return, whichever occurs first. [P-011]
9. Between August 1 and August 7, 2026, Plaintiff made repeated requests to Defendant for access to view the progress of the build and for photographic evidence of that progress. Defendant did not provide meaningful access or a photograph in response to these requests. [P-008]
10. By August 7, 2026, Defendant reported having reached what Defendant described as the "third level" of the build. [P-008]
11. On August 8, 2026, Plaintiff notified Defendant of a firm deadline of August 22, 2026, by which the work was to be completed, coinciding with Plaintiff's return from a period of absence. Defendant confirmed its ability to meet this deadline. [P-007]
12. On or about August 14, 2026, Plaintiff proposed that Defendant expedite completion by pasting the schematic structure onto S058 through the server's designated construction tool ("DCT") and separately completing the interior work thereafter. [P-009]
13. From on or about August 14, 2026, through the closing of the support ticket on or about September 4, 2026, Defendant failed to substantively respond to Plaintiff's repeated inquiries regarding the status of the build, failed to provide any photographic or other verifiable evidence of completed work, and failed to grant Plaintiff access to inspect the build. On August 22, 2026, the date of the agreed deadline, Plaintiff attempted to access S058 to prevent its eviction for inactivity and was unable to do so. Plaintiff's final message in the ticket, sent on or about August 23, 2026, went unanswered. [P-010]
14. As of the filing of this action, Defendant has not completed the agreed construction work, has not returned S058 to Plaintiff, and has not refunded any portion of the $18,000 paid by Plaintiff.
15. Records of S058's title history reflect that, following the transfer of title to Defendant on July 31, 2026, title to S058 was subsequently reassigned on three further occasions in early September 2026 — first to a player identified as "CatGuy666," then to a player identified as "frodo1005," and finally to "sandpoop" — with each such reassignment recorded as an action taken under "Authority: DCGovernment," rather than as a voluntary transfer effected by Defendant. [P-013, P-014]

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
COUNT I - Breach of Contract, (RCCA Part VI § 1)

Plaintiff repeats and incorporates by reference the allegations set forth in the Facts section above.

The Redmont Civil Code Act, Part VI, Section 1 provides that Breach of Contract is committed if a person:

(a) fails to perform obligations under a valid and enforceable contract without lawful excuse.

A valid and enforceable contract existed between Plaintiff and Defendant, satisfying the requirements of the Contracts Act, Section 4(2) — offer, acceptance, consideration, intent, and capacity — as evidenced by the parties' negotiation of scope and price [P-001, P-002], Defendant's delivery of a written contract [P-004], and Plaintiff's acceptance of that contract by conduct and by expressly replying "signed" [P-005], followed by payment and transfer of the plot, fulfilling Plaintiff’s part of that agreement [P-005, P-006].

Defendant failed to perform their obligations under the contract, including completion of the construction work within the agreed upon (and once-extended) timeframe without lawful excuse. Defendant's stated reason for delay and the unavailability of its staff, as shown in P-008, P-009 and P-010, does not constitute a lawful excuse, as the Contracts Act, Section 13(4) expressly provides that "events where there has been negligence, acceptance of unnecessary risk, or mismanagement are not considered force majeure events".

None of the circumstances that would excuse non-performance under the Redmont Civil Code Act, Part VI, Section 1(b-e) are present: the contract is not void or voidable, performance was not rendered impossible by circumstances beyond Defendant's control, Plaintiff did not materially breach first, and Plaintiff was not induced to enter the contract through misrepresentation or duress.

As a direct result of Defendant's breach, Plaintiff has suffered pecuniary loss, including the $18,000 paid to Defendant without receipt of the agreed performance and the loss of plot S058, valued at $165,000, which was evicted by DCGovernment as a consequence of Defendant's failure to complete construction or return the plot. [P-006, P-012, P-013]

COUNT II — Breach of the Plot Transfer & Return Clause

Plaintiff repeats and incorporates by reference the allegations set forth above.

Independent of the general obligation to complete construction, the written contract imposed a distinct and unconditional obligation upon Defendant to return plot S058 to Plaintiff "immediately and without condition" upon completion of the work, or at any time Plaintiff requested its return, whichever occurred first. [P-011]

This obligation constitutes an express term of the parties' agreement under the Contracts Act, Section 5(1), and its breach is independently actionable as a Breach of Contract under the Civil Code Act, Part VI, Section 1, without regard to whether the underlying construction work was ever completed.

Plaintiff's conduct on or about August 22, 2026 — attempting to access S058 directly in order to prevent its eviction — constituted, at minimum, an implicit invocation of Plaintiff's right to have the plot returned. Defendant neither returned the plot nor responded. [P-010]

Defendant's failure to return S058 upon Plaintiff's request, or at all, constitutes an independent breach of an express contractual term.

COUNT III — Breach of the Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, (Contracts Act, §12).

Plaintiff repeats and incorporates by reference the allegations set forth above.

The Contracts Act, §12 provides:

(1) Parties to a contract shall perform their respective duties and exercise their rights under the contract in good faith and in a manner that is fair and just. (2) There exists an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in every contract covered by this Act, whether or not expressly stated.

Defendant breached this implied covenant through a sustained pattern of non-responsiveness and unmet commitments, including failing to provide photographic evidence of progress after expressly agreeing to do so [P-008], failing to respond meaningfully to repeated requests for access and status updates over a period of weeks, and ceasing communication entirely as the agreed upon deadline and the associated risk of eviction approached. This conduct falls short of the honesty, integrity, and fairness required by Section 12. [P-010]

COUNT IV — Failure to deliver Goods or Services, ( RCCA, Part IV, §4)

The Civil Code Act, Part VI, §4 provides that Failure to Deliver Goods or Services is a Strict Liability violation, remediable by up to 200 Civil Penalty Units and/or Specific Performance, where:

A person commits a violation if the person: (a) fails without lawful excuse to deliver goods or services that they have agreed to supply under a valid transaction or contract.

Plaintiff repeats and incorporates by reference the allegations set forth above.

The Defendant agreed, under a valid and enforceable contract, to supply construction and interior-design services to Plaintiff in exchange for payment. Defendant failed to deliver those services, having completed no more than a partial exterior/structural stage of the agreed work by the time of Defendant's last communication with Plaintiff, and provided no lawful excuse for this failure. As addressed under Count I, ordinary staffing difficulties do not constitute a lawful excuse under the Contracts Act, Section 13(4). [P-008, P-009, P-010]

COUNT V — Compensatory Damages, ( RCCA, Part III, §2)

The Civil Code Act, Part III, §2 provides:

(1) Definition: (a) Compensatory damages are the restoration of what the party has lost. (2) Award: (a) Compensatory damages will not be awarded without proof of pecuniary loss, including compensation for harm to property, harm to earning capacity, and the creation of liabilities; unless they are special damage. (b) Compensatory damages are limited to either the authorised statute's limit or the actual amount of damages, whichever is lower.

Plaintiff repeats and incorporates by reference the allegations set forth above.

As a direct and foreseeable result of Defendant's failure to deliver the agreed construction and interior-design services, Plaintiff suffered pecuniary loss consisting of the $18,000 paid to Defendant in exchange for services that were never substantially rendered. This loss is readily calculable and supported by documentary proof of payment. [P-003, P-005]
Additionally, as a direct and foreseeable result of Defendant's failure to complete or timely return plot S058, Plaintiff suffered harm to property in the form of the total loss of S058, which was evicted and reassigned by DCGovernment as a consequence of that failure. [P-013, P-014] This loss is calculable by reference to the $165,000 Plaintiff paid to acquire the plot two days prior to entering into the contract with Defendant. [P-012] Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages in the amount of $165,000 on this basis.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment against Defendant and grant the following relief:

(a) Compensatory Damages in the amount of $18,000, pursuant to Count V, for the value paid in exchange for services not rendered;

(b) Compensatory Damages in the amount of $165,000, pursuant to Count V, representing the value of plot S058, lost as a direct and foreseeable consequence of Defendant's failure to complete or timely return the plot under the parties' contract;

(c) Civil Penalty Units of up to 200, pursuant to Count IV (Failure to Deliver Goods or Services), Civil Code Act, Part VI, Section 4;

(d) Legal fees amounting to 30% of the total damages awarded, payable to Theory, Talion & Partners Inc.

V. EVIDENCE

Spoiler: P-001

P-001 - 31/07/2026 - Scope of the Project

Spoiler: P-002

P-002 - 31/07/2026 - Price Negotiation + Turnaround

Spoiler: P-003

P-003 - 31/07/2026 - Payment Structure

Spoiler: P-004

P-004 - 31/07/2026 - Contract Delivery

Spoiler: P-005

P-005 - 31/07/2026 - Confirmation of Signage & Payment

Spoiler: P-006

P-006 - 31/07/2026 - Plot Transfer

Spoiler: P-007

P-007 - 08/08/2026 - Deadline Confirmation

Spoiler: P-008

P-008 - 07/08/2026 - Failure to Give Photographic Progress Report

Spoiler: P-009

P-009 - 14/08 to 19/08/2026 - DCT Printing Request made

Spoiler: P-010

P-010 - 18/08 to 04/09/2026 - End of the ticket

Spoiler: P-011

P-011 - Written Contract : "S058 Plot Transfer and Return Contract.pdf"

See Attached Document

Spoiler: P-012

P-012 - 29/07/2026 Screenshot of Plot Previous Purchase

Spoiler: P-013

P-013 - 18/09/2026 - Current /rl history of S058

Spoiler: P-014

P-014 - 18/09/2026 - Current realty information of s058

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 26th day of September, 2026.

 

[SoapMcKakashi]

Spoiler

Proof of representation