Appeal: Denied [2025] DCR 48 - Appeal

[pricelessAgrari]

Username: pricelessAgrari

I am representing myself

What Case are you Appealing?: [2025] DCR 48

Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Adjourned - pricelessAgrari v. MysticPhunky [2025] DCR 48

Basis for Appeal: The No More Defamation Act provides protection from statements that are meant to defame your profession. The law was misinterpreted in this case. In the case RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37, the reasonable person test should be applied. The court only weighed one part of Humiliation- Being made to look foolish. This not only overlooks the rest of the defamation, but also possibly creates a dangerous precedent that the reasonable person test does not have to be performed correctly for the Court to decide on the outcome of the case, skipping over the fact that it could have belittled and disgraced.

Similar to the Humiliation charge, in xLayzur & Krix v. Politico [2023] FCR 62, the reasonable person test should be used to determine MysticPhunky's intent. His statements were not just mere questions, for I was a doctor at the time. To prove that I was a doctor at the time, I would like to bring Splatcat349 to the stand to ask a few questions.

Supporting Evidence: Witness Splatcat349 (My training doctor)

 

[pricelessAgrari]

 

[ameslap]

Verdict

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

Following careful deliberation, the Federal Court has decided to deny this appeal.

This court agrees with the verdict in the District Court. The No More Defamation Act indeed protects statements made about one's profession; however in this case we agree that the context is lacking to determine if the statements were actually defamatory or just inquisitive.

Even given the new evidence that the appellant has provided does not give any reasonable person a way to determine the intent behind the message. The initial "are you even a trained doctor btw" statement was made in an internal DOH channel, which a reasonable person could see it as inquisitive about the appellant's status.

Thank you for your patience.

​