Appeal: Pending [2025] DCR 48 - Appeal

[pricelessAgrari]

Username: pricelessAgrari

I am representing myself

What Case are you Appealing?: [2025] DCR 48

Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Adjourned - pricelessAgrari v. MysticPhunky [2025] DCR 48

Basis for Appeal: The No More Defamation Act provides protection from statements that are meant to defame your profession. The law was misinterpreted in this case. In the case RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37, the reasonable person test should be applied. The court only weighed one part of Humiliation- Being made to look foolish. This not only overlooks the rest of the defamation, but also possibly creates a dangerous precedent that the reasonable person test does not have to be performed correctly for the Court to decide on the outcome of the case, skipping over the fact that it could have belittled and disgraced.

Similar to the Humiliation charge, in xLayzur & Krix v. Politico [2023] FCR 62, the reasonable person test should be used to determine MysticPhunky's intent. His statements were not just mere questions, for I was a doctor at the time. To prove that I was a doctor at the time, I would like to bring Splatcat349 to the stand to ask a few questions.

Supporting Evidence: Witness Splatcat349 (My training doctor)

 

[pricelessAgrari]