Search results

  1. C

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Hamilton City Bank v. Wetc [2022] FCR 10

    Your Honor, My apologies but the Plaintiff would like to request a 24 hour extension due to in real life conflicts. We are sorry for any inconvenience. Thank you.
  2. C

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Hamilton City Bank v. Wetc [2022] FCR 10

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Good Evening Your honor, I would firstly like to say that this case is in no way related to an attempt to, “void a mutually agreed upon contract in order to save money.” This case is simply a way to ensure that my clients were...
  3. C

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Hamilton City Bank v. Wetc [2022] FCR 10

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Hamilton City Bank (Cooleagles Representing) Plaintiff v. JackK Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The defendant contacted my client with a proposal labeled the Onyx Backed Credit...
  4. C

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Hamilton City Bank v. Wetc [2022] FCR 10

    Good Evening, Your Honor Before posting this case we must ask for an emergency injunction requesting firstly, that all information regarding the Onyx Backed Credit Obligation between Hamilton City Bank and JackK be allowed to be presented for the public eyes in this courtroom. An NDA signed by...
  5. C

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Hamilton City Bank v. Mr_Augustus [2021] FCR 112

    Your honor, If I may, I would like to make it known that it has been more than the given 48 hours and the defendant has failed to respond to their summons. Thank you.
  6. C

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Hamilton City Bank v. Mr_Augustus [2021] FCR 112

    IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Hamilton City Bank (Cooleagles Representing) Plaintiff v. Mr_Augustus Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The Defendant approached Hamilton City Bank in search of financial support around...
  7. C

    Lawsuit: Adjourned AlexanderLove v. The Attorney General [2021] SCR 19

    Your honor, I am present before this court.
  8. C

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Hamilton City Bank v. MrDuckyDK [2021] FCR 90

    IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Hamilton City Bank (Cooleagles Representing) Plaintiff v. MrDuckyDK Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The plaintiff had a contract with the defendant in which they gave them a loan. This...
  9. C

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Clockwork (Hamilton City) Bank v. HanaHex [2021] FCR 81

    IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Clockwork (Hamilton City) Bank (Cooleagles Representing) Plaintiff v. HanaHex Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The plaintiff had a contract with the defendant in which they gave them a...
  10. C

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. Trentrick_Lamar, ShinHeYing, & Hong_Kong_101 [2021] FCR 76

    Your honor, The following are links to each of the defendant's settlements, along with signatures from each party. - ShinHeYing - Hong_Kong_101 - Trentrick_Lamar
  11. C

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. Trentrick_Lamar, ShinHeYing, & Hong_Kong_101 [2021] FCR 76

    Your honor, I am glad to inform the court that the plaintiff was able to reach settlements with all 3 defendants, if proof or anything is required to show said settlements we will gladly provide. We kindly ask that all charges and allegations be dropped and this court case with it, we are sorry...
  12. C

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. Trentrick_Lamar, ShinHeYing, & Hong_Kong_101 [2021] FCR 76

    Your honor, We would like to request a 48 hour extension for the plaintiff has reached out to the defendants to discuss settlement agreements. I can and will inform the court that one of the Defendants, Hong_Kong_101, has a signed agreement and all allegations should be dropped against him. I...
  13. C

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. Trentrick_Lamar, ShinHeYing, & Hong_Kong_101 [2021] FCR 76

    Your honor, The plaintiff has no objections to a follow up question after their first question; however, the current writing of the first question is leading the witness. It asks and answers the question for the witness, prompting them to give a desired answer. The fact that the defense has...
  14. C

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. Trentrick_Lamar, ShinHeYing, & Hong_Kong_101 [2021] FCR 76

    Objection The Defense's first question is a leading question, your honor. We would ask that the Defense either remove the question or properly reword it. Furthermore, the Defense's second question is testifying for the witness. We would ask the same from the Defense, either remove the question...
  15. C

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. Trentrick_Lamar, ShinHeYing, & Hong_Kong_101 [2021] FCR 76

    Your honor, Although they did leave the assets to the defendants, he left them with one simple instruction. "Nonegoes to HK or Trent. It'll stay company money for the company. Only to be used for the company." Evidence 3 in my complaint. The plaintiff sees the perspective of the Defense...
  16. C

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. Trentrick_Lamar, ShinHeYing, & Hong_Kong_101 [2021] FCR 76

    Your honor, My client, specifically asked that the company money be used for company purposes. At the conclusion of the staff ticket, End said himself to follow through on this request. This was the only direction my client gave. This was the only thing my client asked of his predecessors...
  17. C

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. Trentrick_Lamar, ShinHeYing, & Hong_Kong_101 [2021] FCR 76

    Your honor, There has been a large confusing argument on both sides of the table in regards to what was the Rae Evergrand company. To bring clarity to this large confusion, that even I at a point was stuck in, the company is disbanded. The company was disbanded by End due to the lack of...
  18. C

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. Trentrick_Lamar, ShinHeYing, & Hong_Kong_101 [2021] FCR 76

    Your honor, The plaintiff respectively requests to see this evidence first before a baseless motion is granted.
  19. C

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. Trentrick_Lamar, ShinHeYing, & Hong_Kong_101 [2021] FCR 76

    Your honor, By all means may Evidence 3 be removed. It's purpose was to prove that defendant, ShinReYing, doesn't currently hold shares in the company; specifically, my client's 75% share of the company. I will direct the court back to Evidence 1, which says it all. In regards to the Defense's...
  20. C

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. Trentrick_Lamar, ShinHeYing, & Hong_Kong_101 [2021] FCR 76

    I wouldn't want to prolong it any further, your honor. The plaintiff has no witnesses to be called and is ready to move on to closing statements.
Back
Top