Lawsuit: Adjourned Hamilton City Bank v. MrDuckyDK [2021] FCR 90

[Cooleagles]

IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Hamilton City Bank (Cooleagles Representing)
Plaintiff

v.

MrDuckyDK
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The plaintiff had a contract with the defendant in which they gave them a loan. This loan was due on August 5th and granted an extension to August 12th. It is now the 19th of August and no attempt to pay back the loan has been made at all.

I. PARTIES
1. Hamilton City Bank
2. MrDuckyDK

II. FACTS
1. The defendant was given a loan of $7,500 with a total of $750 in interest on June 30th.
2. On July 11th, the defendant reached out to my client, asking to grant another week to repay the loan due to being banned. This then moved the due date to August 12th.
3. It is now the 19th of August and the defendant has shown no signs of fulfilling their part of the contract.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The defendant gave their signature and acknowledged the contract’s existence.
2. The defendant has not fulfilled their part of the contract.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $7,500 dollars, to repay the original loan
2. $750 dollars, interest on the loan
3. $250 for legal fees

V. EVIDENCE
1. Permission to represent my clients

2. Contract + Defendant's Signature

3. Proof of new due date

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 19th day of August 2021

 

[SumoMC]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of the Hamilton City Bank v.MrDuckyDK. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff.

I'd also like to remind both parties to be aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​

 

[SumoMC]

Verdict

As the Defendant has elected not to respond to the summons, I will be ruling in favor of the Plaintiff. The Defendant will pay the sum of $8,500 to the Plaintiff.

This court is is now Adjourned