Information Expression of Interest - Judge

Courts · May 3, 2025

The Supreme Court in coordination with the President, has decided to open up an expression of interest forum for those with extensive legal experience to express interest in the role of Judge. We would like to emphasize the apolitical role this is, and ask that people respect this process by not campaigning, endorsing, or explicitly supporting any individual for such role.

JUDGE INFORMATION
Judges serve on the Federal Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont. They preside over all cases in the Federal Court and may preside over the District Court. The‌ ‌Federal Court‌ ‌of‌ ‌Redmont‌ ‌hears‌ ‌all‌ ‌major‌ ‌civil‌ ‌and‌ ‌criminal‌ ‌disputes‌ ‌in‌ ‌the‌ ‌first‌ ‌instance and is‌ ‌the‌ ‌appellate‌ ‌court‌ ‌for‌ ‌verdicts‌ ‌made‌ ‌by‌ ‌the‌ ‌District‌ ‌Courts‌.

Judges are expected to maintain judicial integrity and independence, and to perform‌ ‌the‌ ‌duties‌ ‌of‌ ‌the‌ ‌office‌ ‌fairly,‌ ‌impartially,‌ ‌and‌ ‌diligently.‌

EXPRESSION OF INTEREST FORMAT

Reply to this thread with the following:

- Username:
- What are your strengths and weaknesses?:
- Why do you want this position?:
- Are you able to effectively communicate with a team? Explain:
- What kind of legal experience do you have on DC outside of the court?:
- Links to cases you have been involved in:
- Additional Information:

ko531 · May 4, 2025

bloodyrebals · May 4, 2025

- Username: bloodyrebals
- What are your strengths and weaknesses?: Some of my strengths are that I love researching case law, I have good writing and communication skills, I listen to both sides of arguments, a weakness I have is that I am a student, and because of that, sometimes on weekdays, I will be unavailable during early morning hours
- Why do you want this position?: Ever since I first got here, I've loved the law. I've seen the many cases under the FCR at this moment, and I would love to take on some of that burden onto myself.
- Are you able to effectively communicate with a team? Explain: Yes, I have 3 months of experience working with a small team of 3-6 people.
- What kind of legal experience do you have on DC outside of the court?: none
- Links to cases you have been involved in: none
- Additional Information: Thank you for your consideration

Smallfries · May 4, 2025

- Username: Smallfries (Discord) Smallfries4 (Minecraft)

- What are your strengths and weaknesses?: I'm old and experienced, and have been told I'm relatively competent. I try not to make decisions without being informed and thinking through it properly. I try to stay away from politics and partisan affiliation, despite multiple attempts to try to sway me towards various parties. I like to think I'm a solid writer (I've had several DC judges comment positively on my postings, publicly and privately) and good at thinking things through. I also have a background in Economics which could be helpful when it comes to cases that focus more on the economic/finance side of DC.

For weaknesses, I am busy. Like our dear Supreme Court Justice Matthew, I'm in law school so time is a luxury for me. However, compared to running a law firm and maintaining that, sitting as a judge and ~~rolling the dice to see if I dismiss a case or not~~ reading the work someone else has done and thinking it through would likely be much easier time-wise for me than creating cases on my own.

- Why do you want this position?: I'm passionate and I care for the legal scene, not only because of my IRL experience and personal interests, but because I believe that its health and fluidity are of the highest importance to the rest of the server.

In my (potentially biased) opinion, without a stable and healthy legal scene to uphold rules and maintain justice, the rest of the server—be it politics, or finance, or property—falls apart. To protect that is an important mission, and since now we officially have 0 judges I feel that there's a responsibility to help out.

- Are you able to effectively communicate with a team? Explain: Yes. I have worked since January on the SC legal scene with Juniperfig and former PM AlexanderLove, and am currently Chancellor there where I work with the rest of the Judiciary to make things as smooth as we can. Further, I am a partner at Dragon Law where I manage one of our two chains. I have worked with several people in the community in various efforts, be they bills, political/legal systems, etc., and I believe I have proven myself competent in communication and negotiation/compromise in that regard.

Finally, my friends like playing Counter-Strike with me because I make good callouts and can organize the team properly to clutch up and get wins. I think this is highly relevant and important to consider for this role.

- What kind of legal experience do you have on DC outside of the court?: I am a partner at Dragon Law firm, and I am a Chancellor (SCR Justice equivalent) in Alexandria.

- Links to cases you have been involved in: lcn v. Blazora Corporation and MegaMinerM v. Blazora Corporation. The former was featured in Trolligarch's recent video on our server, and I believe both cases showcase the high level of quality, rationalizing thought, and great effort I put into my work. In addition to these two cases, I have informally been a part of several Dragon Law cases and other legal efforts behind the scenes in my role as a manager and partner.

- Additional Information: Mr. President: While I am sure you would reach out to me anyways, in the case that you believe I am a fit for the Federal Court and want to nominate me to be confirmed before the Senate, please inform me ahead of time so I can wrap up my work in DC and stand without any loose ends left.

My DM's are open for any SCR or Presidential questions as to this EoI.

xtub12345 · May 10, 2025

- Username: xtub12345
- What are your strengths and weaknesses?: Strengths: Activity, Determination, Constant Discord. Weaknesses: Weekend Activities, Procrastination.
- Why do you want this position?: Because with the vacancies on the Federal Court, Redmont has a need for experienced judges. I believe I have the experience, time, and abilities to properly execute the office. I have spent most of my more recent time on DC on the courts in some manner, and I believe it is probably where I am most accustomed to being, I feel it would be a proper use of my time on DC.
- Are you able to effectively communicate with a team? Explain: Yes, throughout my time as Chief Judge for the FCR, Magistrate, PD, and SCR Intern, I feel I was able to properly communicate with my colleagues (except near the end), I know how to properly convey a message clearly and correctly and I feel I can utilize this skill on my time in the courts.
- What kind of legal experience do you have on DC outside of the court?: Outside of court positions I've been a RBI Member, OAG Paralegal, Prosecutor, Clerk.
- Links to cases you have been involved in:
Lawsuit: Adjourned - Commonwealth of Redmont v. ko531 [2024] FCR 124

X

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'Jakovus v. Commonwealth of Redmont'

Nov 14, 2024

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Jakovus v. Commonwealth of Redmont

In the Claims for Relief, the Plaintiff states "5. The House Special Election #4 is illegal (explanation in the previous point), which makes the five declarations and 25 votes, again, wasted, all because of the DOS." and in the Prayers for Relief, the Plaintiff asks for the Special Election to be repeated, By claiming that the election itself is illegal the Plaintiff is also disputing the returns of the election. In the Electoral Act (5)(1) it states that "
(1) The...

X

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'Commonwealth of Redmont v. The_Superior10 [2024] FCR 119'

Nov 1, 2024

Motion accepted, case dismissed.

X

Expungement: Granted Post in thread 'Superbiebel - Expungement Request'

Oct 15, 2024

Verdict

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT
Superbiebel - Expungement Request

The recommendation of the state supports this expungement, therefore I will be granting this expungement.

I hereby order the Department of Homeland Security to remove the charges listed.

X

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'steveshat v. LilDigiVert [2024] DCR 16'

Jun 17, 2024

Under Rule 2.2 of the Court Rules and Procedures, I will be dismissing this case. For a case to have standing it must have the following:

Suffered some injury caused by a clear second party; or is affected by an application of law.
The cause of injury was against the law.
Remedy is applicable under relevant law that can be granted by a favorable decision.

The Plaintiff has not claimed that they have faced any injury due to them not being able to gain the plot without a court order. Their Claims for Relief was simply that the owner of the plot, said they could...

X

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'RylandW v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] DCR 15'

Jun 6, 2024

The Motion for Nolle Prosequi is accepted this case is dismissed with prejudice.

X

Lawsuit: Adjourned Post in thread 'funyolk Vs. gsse [2024] DCR 13'

Jun 4, 2024

Verdict

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT
funyolk v. gsse [2024] DCR 13

I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Defendant rented an apartment in his building. By renting said apartment, he agreed not to change it. As seen in evidence filed, the appearance at the time of filing was changed, you can see the difference based off of a model apartment.

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. Affirms apartment was rented by the Defendant, denied that renting said apartment suffices as agreement, neither affirms or disputes that changes were made.

III. THE COURT OPINION
1. First I will be...

X

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'Costco v. .CostcoRep2439 [2024] DCR 14'

May 16, 2024

The Motion for Summary Judgement is denied.

1. While it is true an in-game summons was issued, the Court Policy as written by the Supreme Court under the authorization given to the judiciary under the Save the Public Defender Program Act states that if any of the conditions are met, then a Public Defender will be called, therefore a Public Defender has been called.

2. The Public Defender program is currently made up of 1 person, meaning it takes some time for every case to get assigned so as to not overload them. While it is true that every citizen has the right...

X

Lawsuit: Adjourned Post in thread 'Virtus Group v. VirtuBank [2024] DCR 10'

May 2, 2024

Verdict

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Virtus Group v. VirtuBank [2024] DCR 10

I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Defendant registered the company in an attempt to impersonate Virtus Group (A Company owned by the plaintiff)
2. An attempt to send a cease and desist letter was made by the plaintiff.
3. Defendant's company is in violation of taxation act due to failure to register as a financial institution on the forums.

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. The Defendant never advertised nor mentioned VirtuBank.
2. The Defendant never claimed to be a bank, nor operated in a way a...

X

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'The Commonwealth of Redmont v. The Town of Oakridge [2024] DCR 12'

Mar 23, 2024

Due to the plaintiff asking for the act to be struck as unconstitutional, this is a case involving a question of constitutionality, and as defined in the Judicial Update Act questions of constitutionality, belong in the Federal Court, not the district court. This case will need to be refiled in the Federal Court, This case is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
The Court thanks everyone for their time.

X

Lawsuit: Adjourned Post in thread 'William_Normandy vs kkcrafts2020 [2024] DCR 11'

Mar 23, 2024

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@kkcrafts2020 is required to appear before the court in the case of the William_Normandy v. kkcrafts2020. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff.

I'd also like to remind both parties to be aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

X

Lawsuit: Adjourned Post in thread 'wetc v. Bibsfi4a [2023] FCR 106'

Jan 20, 2024

OPENING STATEMENT

As we have already accepted summary judgment, the defense does not have much to say in it's opening statements. All we wish is that the defenses we presented are taken into account when the verdict of this case is being written. Whilst I have not been able to get into contact with the defendant even though I have tried, I believe there was probably some personal issues that caused him to leave the server and he didn't necessarily mean any harm to the Plaintiffs.

Thank you for your time, your honor.

X

Lawsuit: Adjourned Post in thread 'Dodrio3 v. Darkplays3656 [2023] DCR 51'

Dec 13, 2023

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The defense does not wish to drag out this case considering we have already affirmed the facts of the case to be true, we wish to not waste the courts time.

DATED: This 13th day of December 2023

X

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Bardiya_King [2023] DCR 38'

Nov 8, 2023

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Bardiya_King
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The Defense affirms that Bardiya_King targeted the bounty set on Mr. Love
2. The Defense affirms that Bardiya_King showed intent to kill Mr. Love
2. The Defense denies that Bardiya_King by targeting a bounty showed intent to unlawfully kill Mr. Love

II. DEFENCES
1. Murder is defined as "The act of unlawfully killing another player. This law overrides attempted murder, assault, and trespassing." and Conspiracy is defined...

X

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'Unfairly Taxed Citizens CALG v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 77'

Oct 9, 2022

Your honor, while the DLA certainly recognizes the importance of allowing extensions when IRL circumstances prevent people from being able to be active, we have noticed that The_Donuticus was on the server today more than two hours ago, suggesting that they should have been able to post a response to the motion. For this reason, we recommend you do not dismiss his Tardiness

Evidence he was online:

X

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'MikeOxlonger1 and Soeboekaas v. VortexX_X [2025] DCR 13'

Jan 28, 2025

This case only seeks $27100, Therefore, this case does not belong in the Federal Court and is remanded to the District Court.

X

Lawsuit: Adjourned Post in thread 'Boomsides and Pepecuu v. Lucaa7377 [2025] FCR 10'

Jan 28, 2025

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@lucaaaaMC is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Boomsides and Pepecuu v. Lucaa7377. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures , including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

X

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'Bardiya_King v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 8'

Jan 24, 2025

Alexander P. Love said:
Objection

Breach of Procedure

This is a bunch of random prejudicial arguments packaged into a motion to dismiss and should be struck.

Overruled.
The Plaintiff is allowed to submit a motion to dismiss before the beginning of opening statements.

X

Appeal: Accepted Post in thread '[2025] DCR 1 - Appeal'

Jan 24, 2025

Verdict

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

The Federal Court has decided to Accept this appeal.

The Federal Court hereby overrules Magistrate Ko531's decision to sua sponte dismissal the case. In the definition of slander, it says "which defames another person’s reputation, business, profession, or organization." The RRP is an organization of the plaintiff, and statements made by the Defendant, were about the aforementioned organization, therefore it is possible that the Plaintiff suffered some injury, meaning the case has standing.

The...

X

Lawsuit: Adjourned Post in thread 'dimitre977 V. .BlazingFoxKit [2024] FCR 128'

Jan 24, 2025

I will be taking over this case, this case is now in recess pending a verdict.

Lawsuit: Dismissed Thread 'MikeOxlonger1 and Soeboekaas v. VortexX_X [2025] DCR 13'

Jan 20, 2025

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

(Mike, Soeb)
Plaintiff [Represented by BabySoga proof if necessary can be provided]

v.

(VortexX_X)
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

I. PARTIES
1. Plaintiff [Mike, Soeb]
2. Defendant [VortexX_X]
3.Witness [pepecuu]
4. Witness [MRLOLO]

II. FACTS
1. On the 19th of January 2025 the Defendant started a shooting on Client's of Mike and other bystanders.
2. The Defendant killed know to us 123 people close to Mike's Store around 90% of these were...

Lawsuit: Adjourned Thread 'The Commonwealth of Redmont v. itz_alexey [2025] FCR 2'

Dec 31, 2024

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONTCRIMINAL ACTION

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

itz_alexey
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

PROSECUTING AUTHORITY REPORT
The Defendant illegally trafficked Buffs on two separate occasions. This type of behavior is a clear violation of the law and should be put to a stop.

I. PARTIES

The Commonweath of Redmont (Prosecution)
itz_alexey (Defendant)

II. FACTS

On December 8th, 2024 (In EST), the defendant illegally sold buffs as seen in...

Lawsuit: Dismissed Thread 'AmityBlamity v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 3'

Jan 7, 2025

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

AmityBlamity
Plaintiff

v.

Department of Homeland Security

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

On the 7th day of January, 2025, the Secretary of Homeland Security HellsideBurnton, made a post in the government-announcements channel in the DemocracyCraft Discord server. The post (showcased in p-001) was a reply to a Recruitment Drive previously posted on the 27th day of December, 2024. Titled Dire Need of Officers, the post mentioned a lack of good officers and...

M

Lawsuit: Adjourned Thread 'RoryyyMC v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 129'

Dec 6, 2024

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

RoryyyMC (Represented by Prodigium | Attorneys at Law Managing Partner Matthew100x)
Plaintiff

v.

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

COMPLAINT:
The Executive Officer Freedom Act is a constitutional amendment that failed to satisfy all requirements to become a constitutional amendment. The Executive Officer Freedom Act is a constitutionally complex change that did not have a referendum attached to it. According to Section V of the constitution, when an amendment to the constitution is a complex...

Lawsuit: Adjourned Thread 'Commonwealth of Redmont v. .Sirbucket420 [2024] FCR 127'

Nov 15, 2024

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

CRIMINAL ACTION

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

.Sirbucket420
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follow:

PROSECUTING AUTHORITY REPORT
.Sirbucket420 illegally trafficked 2 Weapons of Mass Destruction (A Fatman and Mini Nuke). This behavior dangers the citizens of Redmont and cannot be allowed to continue.

I. PARTIES
1. The Commonweath of Redmont
2. .Sirbucket420 (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. On November 11th, 2024 (In EST), the defendant offered in public chat to...

- Additional Information: Links are specific posts but there's only 1 per case.

Vernicia · Jan 2, 2026

Username: You know
- What are your strengths and weaknesses? i LOVE NAPS
- Why do you want this position?: To nap in court room. If you dont accept this thingy i will judge you
- Are you able to effectively communicate with a team? Explain: When i have nightmares i talk while napping
- What kind of legal experience do you have on DC outside of the court?: I am nappinator
- Links to cases you have been involved in:
No thank you

ko531 · Jan 2, 2026

- Username: ko531
- What are your strengths and weaknesses?: Strengths are I work well with others and have the experience. Weakness is my availability. I am the type of person who likes to take a lot on as seen with my other terms in the DCR and FCR (a lot of it was not by choice as I was the only judicial officer on the branch like 80% of the time) but I will have to make sure that I keep a limited case load of about 3-5 cases in order to make sure the cases are heard fairly and quickly.
- Why do you want this position?: I miss it. I also think the verdicts are decent writing practice as a journalism major IRL, grammatically speaking.
- Are you able to effectively communicate with a team? Explain: I work better with a team. I have experience running half a department with the DCT as deputy sec, working with collegues on all 3 levels of the courts and working with other lawyers in the DOJ and as Public Defender Director.
- What kind of legal experience do you have on DC outside of the court?: Besides countless jobs as a lawyer in court or as a judicial officer I have countless hours speaking and debating in legal which might not sound like much but I believe it is gold. It is years of fleshing out ideas, seeing how legal concepts or theorys stand under criticism and learning from hundreds of the greatest legal minds to play this server.
- Links to cases you have been involved in: Please dont make me list this as it is 100+. A majority of them are here already if you scroll up.
- Additional Information: I wish to give this job the best I have but I will promise that unlike some that have come before me, I will resign when my best is not good enough.

SimplifiedMax · Friday at 6:32 PM

Courts said:
View attachment 54721
The Supreme Court in coordination with the President, has decided to open up an expression of interest forum for those with extensive legal experience to express interest in the role of Judge. We would like to emphasize the apolitical role this is, and ask that people respect this process by not campaigning, endorsing, or explicitly supporting any individual for such role.

JUDGE INFORMATION
Judges serve on the Federal Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont. They preside over all cases in the Federal Court and may preside over the District Court. The‌ ‌Federal Court‌ ‌of‌ ‌Redmont‌ ‌hears‌ ‌all‌ ‌major‌ ‌civil‌ ‌and‌ ‌criminal‌ ‌disputes‌ ‌in‌ ‌the‌ ‌first‌ ‌instance and is‌ ‌the‌ ‌appellate‌ ‌court‌ ‌for‌ ‌verdicts‌ ‌made‌ ‌by‌ ‌the‌ ‌District‌ ‌Courts‌.

Judges are expected to maintain judicial integrity and independence, and to perform‌ ‌the‌ ‌duties‌ ‌of‌ ‌the‌ ‌office‌ ‌fairly,‌ ‌impartially,‌ ‌and‌ ‌diligently.‌

EXPRESSION OF INTEREST FORMAT

Reply to this thread with the following:

- Username:
- What are your strengths and weaknesses?:
- Why do you want this position?:
- Are you able to effectively communicate with a team? Explain:
- What kind of legal experience do you have on DC outside of the court?:
- Links to cases you have been involved in:
- Additional Information:

Username: SimplifiedMax
- What are your strengths and weaknesses?:

Strengths: Fairness and impartiality are two of my strongest traits. I don't base my decisions on friendships or personal opinions, but rather on evidence and server rules. I am calm under pressure, patient, and able to articulate my points in a way that makes everyone feel heard. In order to make accurate decisions, I also take rules seriously and pay great attention to specifics like chat logs and timelines.

Weaknesses: One of my weaknesses is that I occasionally spend more time going over information to make sure my choice is the right one. I'm learning to strike a balance between thoroughness and efficiency, even though this promotes fairness. I also like to settle disputes amicably, but I'm trying to be more firm and decisive when strong authority is needed.

- Why do you want this position?:

I genuinely care about justice and the general well-being of the server community, which is why I want this job. A judge is crucial in ensuring that the rules are followed consistently and that players are respected and feel heard. I like to settle disputes amicably and rationally, and I think this position enables me to make a constructive contribution by keeping drama and miscommunications from getting worse.

Additionally, I would like to support the staff team and assume more responsibility. I would be able to use my knowledge of the rules, communication abilities, and sense of justice to help keep a fair and entertaining environment for all players if I were to become a judge.

- Are you able to effectively communicate with a team? Explain:

I can communicate with a team in an efficient manner, yes. When working with other employees, I think it's crucial to communicate politely and clearly, especially in positions like judges that call for consistency and coordination. Before making a decision, I feel at ease debating cases, exchanging evidence, and hearing other points of view.

I also recognize how crucial it is to maintain orderly and professional communication, whether via Discord or in-game chat. I answer politely, seek clarification when needed, and give concise updates when required. This makes it easier for the staff team to stay informed and collaborate effectively in order to respect server policies and preserve an equitable atmosphere.

- What kind of legal experience do you have on DC outside of the court?:

I have relevant experience on Discord outside of formal court proceedings, even though I lack real-world legal experience. I've reviewed evidence like chat logs, screenshots, and recordings, and I know how crucial it is to confirm context and authenticity before making judgments. I have experience resolving conflicts, debating rule interpretations, and clearly and methodically communicating decisions to others.

- Links to cases you have been involved in:

Non, Brand New Judge

- Additional Information:

None

Information Expression of Interest - Judge

Citizen

Citizen

Citizen

Citizen

Federal Judge

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'Jakovus v. Commonwealth of Redmont'

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'Commonwealth of Redmont v. The_Superior10 [2024] FCR 119'

Expungement: Granted Post in thread 'Superbiebel - Expungement Request'

Verdict

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'steveshat v. LilDigiVert [2024] DCR 16'

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'RylandW v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] DCR 15'

Lawsuit: Adjourned Post in thread 'funyolk Vs. gsse [2024] DCR 13'

Verdict

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'Costco v. .CostcoRep2439 [2024] DCR 14'

Lawsuit: Adjourned Post in thread 'Virtus Group v. VirtuBank [2024] DCR 10'

Verdict

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'The Commonwealth of Redmont v. The Town of Oakridge [2024] DCR 12'

Lawsuit: Adjourned Post in thread 'William_Normandy vs kkcrafts2020 [2024] DCR 11'

Lawsuit: Adjourned Post in thread 'wetc v. Bibsfi4a [2023] FCR 106'

Lawsuit: Adjourned Post in thread 'Dodrio3 v. Darkplays3656 [2023] DCR 51'

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Bardiya_King [2023] DCR 38'

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'Unfairly Taxed Citizens CALG v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 77'

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'MikeOxlonger1 and Soeboekaas v. VortexX_X [2025] DCR 13'

Lawsuit: Adjourned Post in thread 'Boomsides and Pepecuu v. Lucaa7377 [2025] FCR 10'

Lawsuit: Dismissed Post in thread 'Bardiya_King v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 8'

Objection

Appeal: Accepted Post in thread '[2025] DCR 1 - Appeal'

Verdict

Lawsuit: Adjourned Post in thread 'dimitre977 V. .BlazingFoxKit [2024] FCR 128'

Lawsuit: Dismissed Thread 'MikeOxlonger1 and Soeboekaas v. VortexX_X [2025] DCR 13'

Case Filing

Lawsuit: Adjourned Thread 'The Commonwealth of Redmont v. itz_alexey [2025] FCR 2'

Lawsuit: Dismissed Thread 'AmityBlamity v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 3'

Case Filing

Lawsuit: Adjourned Thread 'RoryyyMC v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 129'

Case Filing

Lawsuit: Adjourned Thread 'Commonwealth of Redmont v. .Sirbucket420 [2024] FCR 127'

Citizen

Citizen

Citizen

Welcome to Democracycraft!