Lawsuit: Pending 12700k v jb4bass [2025] FCR 93

[Rookieblue14]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

12700k
Plaintiff

v.

jb4bass
Defendant

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

On July 22nd, 2025 jb4bass entered into a loan contract with Thrive Financial, a sole proprietorship owned and operated by 12700k. jb4bass pledged plots av-y014 and rh048 as collateral to secure the loan. After receiving the funds from the loan jb4bass failed to make any payments towards repaying the loan, and after being notified he was in default, sold av-y014 in violation of the Use of Collateral agreement of the contract, and is actively attempting to see rh048.

I. PARTIES
1. 12700k - Plaintiff
2. Jb4bass - Defendant

II. FACTS

1. Thrive Financial is a sole proprietorship owned and operated by 12700k at all times relevant to this case.
2. On 22 July 2025, jb4bass entered into a contract (the “Contract”) to refinance a previous loan agreement with Thrive Financial (see: Exhibits P-001 and P-002).
3. In the Contract, jb4bass agreed to a principal amount of $120,000 and agreed to repay $148,000 in 17 payments due weekly (see: Exhibits P-001 and P-002).
4. jb4bass pledged plots av-y014 and rh048 as collateral for the Contract, which he owned at the time of signing the contract (see: Exhibit P-001).
5. Under the Contract’s Section 4.3 “Use of Collateral”, jb4bass was prohibited from selling, transferring, or otherwise disposing of collateral properties without 12700k’s consent.
6. On 31 July 2025, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant that the Defendant was in default of the loan due to missing two payments (see: Exhibit P-003).
7. In this notice, the Plaintiff provided 48 hours notice to allow the Defendant to cure this violation (see: Exhibit P-003).
8. After signing the Contract, jb4bass sold av-y014 without 12700k’s in violation of the Use of Collateral agreement (see: Exhibit P-004 and Exhibit P-005).
9. After signing the Contract, jb4bass has listed rh048 for sale, in violation of Collateral agreement (See: Exhibit P-006 Exhibit P-006).
10. The Contract stipulates that if the Plaintiff failed to make a payment within two days of the due date of each payment, a $1,000 late fee would be assessed.
11. The Defendant has paid the Plaintiff neither the loan principal, loan interest, nor any loan late fees.
12. The defendant was sent a mail message on Wednesday, July 23rd, 2025 at 1:41pm notifying the defendant of the loan document, provided a link to the loan document, and included the long form consent message. (P-008)
13. On September 25th, 2025 at 8:03am EST-1 jb4bass was on the server and notified by Inknet in the Global channel regarding this case. During the subsequent conversation jb4bass stated, "ik i agreed but im busy". (P-009)

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. Breach of Contract. Under Section 7(1) et seq. of the Contracts Act, “A breach of contract occurs when a party fails to fulfil its contractual obligations. …Remedies for breach may include damages, specific performance, or other equitable relief.” In violation of the Contract terms, the Defendant failed to repay the loan. What’s more, the Defendant sold off collateral, and is seeking to sell off further collateral, also in Breach of Contract. The Breach of Contract has caused a loss of the principal, late fees and anticipated interest which together total $149,800.
2. Misrepresentation. Under Section 8 of the Contracts Act, “Misrepresentation happens when a false statement induces another party to enter into a contract”. Remedies for misrepresentation may include rescission, damages, or other appropriate relief. In violation of the Contract terms, the Defendant falsely stated they would comply with the terms and conditions of the contract by maintaining control of the properties listed as collateral.
3. Violation of Good Faith and Fair Dealing. Section 14 of the Contracts Act states Parties to a contract shall perform their respective duties and exercise their rights under the contract in good faith and in a manner that is fair and just. In violation of Section 14 the Defendant engaged in conduct neither fair nor just after defaulting on the loan the Defendant began to sell off properties used as collateral to prevent the Plaintiff from obtaining ownership.
4. Fraud. Part VII, Section 7 of the Criminal Code Act states that a person commits the crime of Fraud when they knowingly or recklessly misrepresents or omits a material fact to another, causing the other party to rely on that misrepresentation, resulting in actual, quantifiable harm. According to Part I, Section 6 of the Criminal Code Act, crimes may be used to seek damages in civil lawsuits. The Defendant knowingly omitted the fact they would sell off the properties used as collateral under this contract. The Plaintiff relied on this omission as they believed the properties would still be in the Defendant’s sole possession and would be able to be repossessed in the event of default. This resulted in actual, quantifiable harm as the Plaintiff is no longer able to repossess Plot av-y014, valued at $25,000, and stands to lose the ability to repossess Plot rh048, valued at $15,000.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. Liquidated damages. This includes the transfer collateral property, as well as any funds owed on the balance of the loan ($149,000) that is above the value of the collateral.
2. Punitive damages of $20,000 to deter future misconduct.
3. Legal damages amounting to 30% of the total case value (Awarded to Mezimori Legal Department).

V. EXHIBITS

Spoiler: Exhibit P-001

Loan Refinance Agreement - FTLCEO and Jb4bass (1).pdf

drive.google.com

Spoiler: Exhibit P-002

Spoiler: Exhibit P-003

Spoiler: Exhibit P-004

Spoiler: Exhibit P-005

Spoiler: Exhibit P-006

Spoiler: P-007

DoC Ticket Transcript

Spoiler: P-008

Staff Ticket Transcript

Spoiler: P-009

WITNESSES:

1) aubunny
2) jb4bass

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 26th day of August, 2025

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

Your Honor:

The Plaintiff will be irreparably harmed if the defendant’s assets are transferred to third parties or made irrecoverable. In previous cases, such as The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Westray & Partypig678 [2022] FCR 47, the Federal Court of Redmont has authorized freezing of a Defendant’s assets during ongoing litigation in order to preserve the ability to actually collect an award in the case of a guilty verdict.

The Defendant has already sold plot av-y014, one of two properties that was specifically listed as collateral under this contract, and currently has the second, RH048, listed for sale. The Defendant’s steps to sell off the collateral under this contract demonstrate an imminent danger of further harm if action is not taken.

Therefore, in order to prevent irreparable harm to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff asks for the court to freeze the following assets and prevent their transfer to any third party until the conclusion of this case:

1. Any funds up to the amount owed presently within the in-game balances of jb4bass or any other alternative accounts thereof;
2. Any real property directly owned or beneficially owned by jb4bass or any other alternative accounts thereof (c.f. Evidence P-IN1);
3. Any other assets of jb4bass or any other alternative accounts thereof, including but not limited to:

1. Pre-paid leases or rental rights;
2. Bank accounts at Voyager, Vanguard, MZ Bank, Cobblestone Bank, Dino Nuggie Bank, Bank of Revielle, and/or any other bank;
3. Financial accounts at the National Exchange of Redmont or any other non-bank financial institution;
4. Stock warrants, rights, or options owned;
5. Accounts receivable;
6. Membership, shares held, or any other ownership rights in any business;
7. Inventory, cash balances, and/or assets present in any non-registered business owned;
8. Property held in any Vault;
9. Property held in any chest, barrel, ender chest, item frame, or other locked storage container or locked item;
10. Automotive, aviation, or other vehicle assets;
11. Intellectual Property, such as trademarks or copyrights;
12. Beneficial ownership in any trust.

Evidence

Spoiler: Exhibit P-IN1

 

[Rookieblue14]

Proof of Representation

 

[AmityBlamity]

Writ of Summons

@jb4bass is hereby ordered to appear before the Federal Court of Redmont in the case of 12700k v jb4bass [2025] FCR 93.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

Your Honor:

The Plaintiff will be irreparably harmed if the defendant’s assets are transferred to third parties or made irrecoverable. In previous cases, such as The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Westray & Partypig678 [2022] FCR 47, the Federal Court of Redmont has authorized freezing of a Defendant’s assets during ongoing litigation in order to preserve the ability to actually collect an award in the case of a guilty verdict.

The Defendant has already sold plot av-y014, one of two properties that was specifically listed as collateral under this contract, and currently has the second, RH048, listed for sale. The Defendant’s steps to sell off the collateral under this contract demonstrate an imminent danger of further harm if action is not taken.

Therefore, in order to prevent irreparable harm to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff asks for the court to freeze the following assets and prevent their transfer to any third party until the conclusion of this case:

1. Any funds up to the amount owed presently within the in-game balances of jb4bass or any other alternative accounts thereof;
2. Any real property directly owned or beneficially owned by jb4bass or any other alternative accounts thereof (c.f. Evidence P-IN1);
3. Any other assets of jb4bass or any other alternative accounts thereof, including but not limited to:

1. Pre-paid leases or rental rights;
2. Bank accounts at Voyager, Vanguard, MZ Bank, Cobblestone Bank, Dino Nuggie Bank, Bank of Revielle, and/or any other bank;
3. Financial accounts at the National Exchange of Redmont or any other non-bank financial institution;
4. Stock warrants, rights, or options owned;
5. Accounts receivable;
6. Membership, shares held, or any other ownership rights in any business;
7. Inventory, cash balances, and/or assets present in any non-registered business owned;
8. Property held in any Vault;
9. Property held in any chest, barrel, ender chest, item frame, or other locked storage container or locked item;
10. Automotive, aviation, or other vehicle assets;
11. Intellectual Property, such as trademarks or copyrights;
12. Beneficial ownership in any trust.

Evidence

Spoiler: Exhibit P-IN1

View attachment 61258

I will be granting a modified emergency injunction. The freeze will be granted solely for jb4bass. Unless you can provide evidence of these so-called alternative accounts, then there is little this court can do to place a freeze on their assets.

I hereby order the DHS to enact the freeze, and to seize jb4bass's regions for the duration of the case.

I also hereby order the DHS to seize av-y014 for the duration of the case, until the question of collateral is settled.

 

[Rookieblue14]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

We move that the courts enter Summary Judgement, taking into consideration that:

1. The defendant has failed to appear in the 72 hour timeline required by the court.

 

[Rookieblue14]

Good afternoon your honor, the defendant in this case has not appeared in over a week. I respectfully ask that my above motion be ruled on.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

We move that the courts enter Summary Judgement, taking into consideration that:

1. The defendant has failed to appear in the 72 hour timeline required by the court.

Motion denied. A public defender will be appointed shortly.

 

[asexualdinosaur]

Your honour,

The PD program is here to represent.

Thank you.

 

[asexualdinosaur]

​

Answer to Complaint

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

12700k
Plaintiff

v.

Jb4bass
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. Deny
2. Deny
3. Deny defendant agreed to this contract, Deny the repayment was $148,000 in 17 payments weekly per the contract.
4. Deny, Affirm the plots were owned by the plaintiff.
5. Affirm this is what the contract states.
6. Neither Affirm nor Deny.
7. Neither Affirm nor Deny; Deny that’s what the evidence shows.
8. Deny the contract was signed. Affirm plaintiff sold av-y014. Deny plaintiff was in violation of the contract.
9. Deny the contract was signed. Affirm rh048 was for sale. Deny plaintiff was in violation of the contract.
10. Affirm that P-001 says this.
11. Affirm

II. DEFENCES
1. Thrive Financial or FTL Financial do not exist as an in-game entity, nor does the entity listed for payment in Section 3.2 of P-001 -- “TF”, It’s unclear how the defendant could’ve entered into a Contract with an entity that does not exist! As seen in D-001, D-002, and D-003
2. P-002 doesn’t appear to display the defendant accepting the contract and its terms, but rather being led into repeating a phrase by the Plaintiff, even if the intent were to have accepted a contract- it’s not clear what contract or what terms were being agreed to. Contracts Act §4.2.b - “Acceptance is the positive and unambiguous response to an offer communicated to the offeror, mirroring the terms of the offer and conveyed through various means.”
P-002 is not ‘unambiguous’ as to what the defendant is or would be accepting, nor did they mirror the terms of the offer that would’ve made it clear.
3. Intent is not clear either, P-002 doesn’t indicate that the defendant was aware of the contract. Even stating that “idk the rest” -- even though if they had the contract available to them they would’ve seen quoted agreement in §8. Additionally the format for agreement was not followed by the Plaintiff either, so it’s doubly unclear that this was the Contract the defendant would’ve been agreeing to, if at all.
4. Even if the defendant was obligated to repay the loan, as noted above it would’ve been impossible to deposit the funds into the account listed in §3.2 “TF” as it does not exist.
5. P-003 is an easily editable log and we do not accept its legitimacy, evidence such as this has been struck in the past royalsnakee v. IIKermitII - and provided no collaborating evidence is provided in discovery, defense will move to strike this as well.
6. The contract is not validly formed, the entities the agreement is between do not exist, and the entity to make a payment to also does not exist, it’s hard to see how there’s a case at all.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 19th day of September 2025

Spoiler: D-001

Spoiler: D-002

Spoiler: D-003

Spoiler: D-004

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

The defense moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. Court Rules and Procedures 2.1 Standing Application
It’s unclear how a ‘sole-proprietorship’ that does not exist can have a claim in this court by the plaintiff. The Plaintiff does not own any DB resembling “Thrive”, “Thrive Financial”, “FTL Financial”, or “TF”
The defense suggests that there is a lack of standing from the plaintiff to bring forward this case even under the assumption that the contract was valid. The plaintiff has no standing for these supposed businesses- They are NOT registered in-game and cannot act as a legal entity for which to stake a claim.

2. Court Rules and Procedures 5.5 - Lack of Claim
As the entities that the defendant supposedly signed a contract with do not exist and that P-002 does NOT show that acceptance or intent has been met in order to form a valid contract. The defense suggests that there is a lack of claim before this court.

edited to fix hyperlink to royalsnakee case

 

[AmityBlamity]

I'm giving the plaintiff 24 hours to respond to the above.

 

[Rookieblue14]

Response

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

Your honor, the plaintiff would like to offer the transcript of Department of Commerce #ticket-23650, which shows that my client requested both Thrive Financial (TF) and FTL Financial (FTLBank) be dissolved in-game on September 14th (P-007). The businesses both existed during the time frame this incident occurred, and when this case was filed. As noted in the Legal Entities Act in regards to Sole Proprietorships, "(2) Sole proprietorships shall still be regarded as a legal entity" and "(3) All assets and liabilities of the sole proprietorship shall be regarded as assets and liabilities of the owner of the sole proprietorship". As 12700k was the sole owner and operator of both Thrive Financial and FTL Bank, all assets and liabilities of both organizations are his, including this loan. As such 12700k has standing for this case.

We also note that the defense's client does not have a discord account, as previously acknowledged in YourLocalDiabeto v. jb4bass [2025] DCR 56. Because of this jb4bass made the agreement in-game. P-002 shows that j4bass intended to enter this agreement. Before 12700k provided the correct format, jb4bass stated, “I, jb4bass accept this idk the rest.” While the defense claims this was merely an attempt to have him repeat the words, the screenshot's context contradicts that assertion. 12700k explains the required format and offers a shortened version for jb4bass’ convenience. It is therefore evident that jb4bass knowingly and voluntarily entered into a contractual agreement with 12700k.

Spoiler: P-007

DoC Ticket Transcript

 

[Rookieblue14]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to Amend Complaint

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 the plaintiff amends their complaint to include the following facts:

12. The defendant was sent a mail message on Wednesday, July 23rd, 2025 at 1:41pm notifying the defendant of the loan document, provided a link to the loan document, and included the long form consent message. (P-008)

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 the plaintiff amends their complaint to include the following evidence:

Spoiler: P-007

DoC Ticket Transcript

Spoiler: P-008

Staff Ticket Transcript

 

[Rookieblue14]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to Amend Complaint

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 the plaintiff amends their complaint to include the following witnesses:

1) aubunny
2) Staff

 

[Rookieblue14]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to Amend Complaint

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 the plaintiff amends their complaint to include the following facts:

13. On September 25th, 2025 at 8:03am EST-1 jb4bass was on the server and notified by Inknet in the Global channel regarding this case. During the subsequent conversation jb4bass stated, "ik i agreed but im busy". (P-009)

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 the plaintiff amends their complaint to include the following evidence:

Spoiler: P-009

 

[Rookieblue14]

Good evening your honor, I responded to motion 7 days ago (less about an hour). I respectfully request the case to continue.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Good evening your honor, I responded to motion 7 days ago (less about an hour). I respectfully request the case to continue.

Apologies. To put it in professional terms, I am sick as shit. I'll get the case moving as soon as possible.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Alright, let's get this show back on the road.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to Amend Complaint

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 the plaintiff amends their complaint to include the following facts:

12. The defendant was sent a mail message on Wednesday, July 23rd, 2025 at 1:41pm notifying the defendant of the loan document, provided a link to the loan document, and included the long form consent message. (P-008)

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 the plaintiff amends their complaint to include the following evidence:

Spoiler: P-007

DoC Ticket Transcript

Spoiler: P-008

Staff Ticket Transcript

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to Amend Complaint

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 the plaintiff amends their complaint to include the following facts:

13. On September 25th, 2025 at 8:03am EST-1 jb4bass was on the server and notified by Inknet in the Global channel regarding this case. During the subsequent conversation jb4bass stated, "ik i agreed but im busy". (P-009)

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 the plaintiff amends their complaint to include the following evidence:

Spoiler: P-009

View attachment 62966

These motions are granted.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to Amend Complaint

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 the plaintiff amends their complaint to include the following witnesses:

1) aubunny
2) Staff

Partially granted. I will be allowing aubunny as a witness, but not Staff. I will not be calling the Staff team without very good reason.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

The defense moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. Court Rules and Procedures 2.1 Standing Application
It’s unclear how a ‘sole-proprietorship’ that does not exist can have a claim in this court by the plaintiff. The Plaintiff does not own any DB resembling “Thrive”, “Thrive Financial”, “FTL Financial”, or “TF”
The defense suggests that there is a lack of standing from the plaintiff to bring forward this case even under the assumption that the contract was valid. The plaintiff has no standing for these supposed businesses- They are NOT registered in-game and cannot act as a legal entity for which to stake a claim.

2. Court Rules and Procedures 5.5 - Lack of Claim
As the entities that the defendant supposedly signed a contract with do not exist and that P-002 does NOT show that acceptance or intent has been met in order to form a valid contract. The defense suggests that there is a lack of claim before this court.

edited to fix hyperlink to royalsnakee case

Denied at this time.

We shall now enter discovery, which will last 5 days or less if both parties agree to end it earlier.

 

[Rookieblue14]

Interrogatives for the Defendant:

1) Did you enter into an agreement with 12700k, on behalf of Thrive Financial, to refinance an already existing loan?

2) Did you agree to use av-y014 and rh048 as collateral for the agreement?

3) Why did you list plots av-y014 and rh048 for reselling?

4) How much did you receive for the sale of av-y014?

 

[Rookieblue14]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff seeks to compel the defendant to produce any communication with other players regarding the sale, potential sale of, or transfer of plots av-y014 and rh048.

 

[Rookieblue14]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
NON-RESPONSIVE

Your honor, under Rule 4.8 (Interrogatories) the defendant is required to provide answers to Interrogatories must be made within 48 hours of being asked. It has been over 72 since the interrogatives were presented and they have not been acknowledged nor answered by the defense.

 

[asexualdinosaur]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
NON-RESPONSIVE

Your honor, under Rule 4.8 (Interrogatories) the defendant is required to provide answers to Interrogatories must be made within 48 hours of being asked. It has been over 72 since the interrogatives were presented and they have not been acknowledged nor answered by the defense.

Such is the work of a public defender, I am currently trying to gain contact with my client to best answer the questions, apologies for the delay.

I could offer a best guess toward the situation as their counsel, but I'd really suggest calling them as a witness and posing these questions then if they're able to show up - If there are alternate interrogatives you can consider that do not specifically require testimony or input from my client then those would be easier answered.

 

[Rookieblue14]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to Amend Complaint

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 the plaintiff amends their complaint to include the following witness:
jb4bass

 

[AmityBlamity]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to Amend Complaint

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 the plaintiff amends their complaint to include the following witness:
jb4bass

Granted.

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
NON-RESPONSIVE

Your honor, under Rule 4.8 (Interrogatories) the defendant is required to provide answers to Interrogatories must be made within 48 hours of being asked. It has been over 72 since the interrogatives were presented and they have not been acknowledged nor answered by the defense.

Overruled. I'm not going to punish the public defender for their client's lack of communication.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff seeks to compel the defendant to produce any communication with other players regarding the sale, potential sale of, or transfer of plots av-y014 and rh048.

Denied. The public defender has answered this to the best of their ability. If the defendant makes themselves present during witness interrogation, you may make the same motion then.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Discovery is now over. @Rookieblue14 you have 72 hours to file your Opening Statement.

 

[Rookieblue14]

Opening Statement

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT

Your honor,

This case is a clear cut violation of a loan contract and the plaintiff seeks to recover their losses. The Plaintiff only seeks the damages they're entitled to as part of the contract, legal costs to pursue this case, as well as punitive damages to serve as a deterrent against future conduct.

A Contract Exists
jb4bass entered into a loan refinancing contract with Thrive Financial, a sole proprietorship run by 12700k. According to the Contracts Act a Contract exists when there is an Offer, Acceptance, Consideration, Intent, and Capacity. Each and every trigger is met. An offer was clearly made, as shown in P-001. The defendant accepted, as shown in P-002 and P-009. The defendant received consideration in terms of having their loan refinanced as shown in P-001. The was clear intent to enter into this agreement on both sides as shown in P-001, P-002, and P-009. And the defendant is a long time player that clearly had the capacity to enter into such agreement.

A Breach of Contract Occurred
After entering into the loan agreement the defendant failed to make any payments as agreed and further listed properties for sale that were explicitly listed as collateral to secure this loan. The defendant violated the repayment terms, collateral agreement, and failed to uphold the good faith and fair dealings clause of the contract.

The Plaintiff Suffered a Loss
Due to the defendant's actions 12700k suffered a loss of the value of the loan, $149,000, as well as both av-y014 and rh048 which were used to secure the loan.

The Defendant's Actions were Outrageous
According to the Legal Damages Act punitive damages may be awarded against a person to punish them for their outrageous conduct. The plaintiff contends that entering into a contract, refusing to make any agreed payments, and then selling off assets used to secure the loan in the first place is absolutely outrageous conduct worthy of punitive damages being awarded.

The plaintiff requests the Court enforce the terms of the contract and find for the plaintiff in all prayers.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Thank you. @asexualdinosaur you have 72 hours to file your Opening Statement.

 

[Rookieblue14]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion for Default Judgement

Your honor, the plaintiff moves for Default Judgement under Rule 3.6 (Default Judgment, Failure to Submit Defense). Rule 3.6 reads: "Defendants must amend any answer to have affirmations or denials on all facts in addition to having defenses under the law or fact prior to the end of discovery. Failure to include the necessary information is grounds for plaintiffs to request the presiding judge to grant default judgment against the defendant."

On September 21st the complaint was amended to include a 12th fact, and on September 25th the complaint was amended to include a 13th fact. The defense has failed to amend their answer by the end of discovery, and under Rule 3.6 have failed to submit a defense. As these amendments were made prior to the start of Discovery, the additional time provided by Rule 3.7 do not apply.

Given the above, the plaintiff requests the Court make a default judgement in favor of the plaintiff.

 

[asexualdinosaur]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion for Default Judgement

Your honor, the plaintiff moves for Default Judgement under Rule 3.6 (Default Judgment, Failure to Submit Defense). Rule 3.6 reads: "Defendants must amend any answer to have affirmations or denials on all facts in addition to having defenses under the law or fact prior to the end of discovery. Failure to include the necessary information is grounds for plaintiffs to request the presiding judge to grant default judgment against the defendant."

On September 21st the complaint was amended to include a 12th fact, and on September 25th the complaint was amended to include a 13th fact. The defense has failed to amend their answer by the end of discovery, and under Rule 3.6 have failed to submit a defense. As these amendments were made prior to the start of Discovery, the additional time provided by Rule 3.7 do not apply.

Given the above, the plaintiff requests the Court make a default judgement in favor of the plaintiff.

Permission to respond your honor?

 

[Rookieblue14]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion for Default Judgement

Your honor, the plaintiff moves for Default Judgement under Rule 3.6 (Default Judgment, Failure to Submit Defense). Rule 3.6 reads: "Defendants must amend any answer to have affirmations or denials on all facts in addition to having defenses under the law or fact prior to the end of discovery. Failure to include the necessary information is grounds for plaintiffs to request the presiding judge to grant default judgment against the defendant."

On September 21st the complaint was amended to include a 12th fact, and on September 25th the complaint was amended to include a 13th fact. The defense has failed to amend their answer by the end of discovery, and under Rule 3.6 have failed to submit a defense. As these amendments were made prior to the start of Discovery, the additional time provided by Rule 3.7 do not apply.

Given the above, the plaintiff requests the Court make a default judgement in favor of the plaintiff.

Good afternoon your honor @AmityBlamity , I respectfully ask for a ruling on my motion submitted 7 days ago.

 

[ameslap]

Good afternoon your honor @AmityBlamity , I respectfully ask for a ruling on my motion submitted 7 days ago.

Apologies all, I have taken over this case.

I will let you know my rulings here soon.

 

[ameslap]

Permission to respond your honor?

You have 24 hours to respond.

 

[asexualdinosaur]

You have 24 hours to respond.

Apologies your honour,

Might I request a 2 hour extension on this provide a response

 

[Rookieblue14]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Breach of Procedure

Respectfully, the Plaintiff objects to this extension. The defense was provided a 24 hour notice to make the response as requested, failed to do so, and did not request an extension until after the deadline expired. We request the defense not be allowed a response and to rule on the motion for default judgement for Failure to Submit a Defense.

 

[asexualdinosaur]

You have 24 hours to respond.

Your honor,

In the interest of saving the court time with the acknowledgement this may be struck;

I would persuasively ask this court to consider that the amendment to the complaint was particularly unnecessary, especially considering it was accompanied by evidence P-009. Nothing new was really brought to be contested, and these sorts of chat logs have regularly been accepted as evidence.

Additionally a similar situation occurred within this case and the judicial officer at the time had dismissed the case on the grounds that the public defender failed to meet the bar for competency, which I would be inclined to suggest is what had happened here. The defendant should not be punished for a failure of their counsel, of which they did not themselves choose or appoint, referring to Rule 6.5 within the Court Rules and Procedures.

Lawsuit: Dismissed - MrEntomology v. byleth_irl [2025] FCR 20

That case also references another in which a public defender had been reassigned following a ruling of ineffective counsel.

Lawsuit: Adjourned - MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15


Your honor, I humbly request that you either allow the Public Defender Program to reassign a defender, or dismiss this case so it can be brought forward again and handled correctly.

Thank you.