Lawsuit: Dismissed zinfern275 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] DCR 93

[lolbruh6]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

CIVIL ACTION



zinfern275

Plaintiff



v.



Commonwealth of Redmont

Defendant



COMPLAINT



The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

The plaintiff, zinfern275 , was unlawfully detained and fined for crimes he had not committed. he was minding his own business when he was arrested for a crime he hadn't done. "i was fishing and this guy mrchessyguy just arrested me and took $700". the plaintiff had been arrested for 2x murder by mrchessyguy out of the despite the fact that he had only killed one person on self-defense on an entirely different matter. The plaintiff was sentenced to 30mins and fined 700$. The Plaintiff contends that these actions constituted unlawful due process violations, and seeks a declaratory judgment, $1,500 in statutory damages for time unlawfully served, reimbursement of any fines paid, $12,000 in consequential damages for loss of enjoyment and safety, $6,000 in nominal damages if compensatory damages are denied, $15,000 in punitive damages due to the outrageous conduct of the and 30% of the total case value in legal fees.



I. PARTIES

zinfern275 (represented by lolbruh6)
II. FACTS

zinfern275 was fishing on 5th June 2026 without any disturbance


zinfern275 was arrested on charges of 2x murder


zinfern275 was fined 700$ and detained for 30 mins
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

Violation of Section 32(15) of the Constitution which states
"Every citizen has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure"
2. Violation of Section 32(14) of the Constitution which states

"Every citizen has the right to life, liberty, and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice."


IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. $50 per minute the plaintiff spent in jail under the Criminal Code act for a total of $1,500 in compensatory damages

2. $15,000 in punitive damages

3. $12,000 in consequential damages for the loss of enjoyment in Redmont

4. If compensatory damages are not awarded, the Plaintiff requests $6,000 in nominal damages under the Legal Damages Act to recognize the Commonwealth of Redmont violation of the Plaintiff’s rights.

5. 30% of the case value in legal fees



By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.



DATED: 9 June 2026

 

[Muggy21]

This appears to be an appeal of a summary offense AND a tort action.
What charges are you appealing?

You said in the Complaint that "the plaintiff had been arrested for 2x murder by mrchessyguy out of the despite the fact that he had only killed one person on self-defense on an entirely different matter. "

Please post the charges you're appealing using /police records (the Plaintiff must do it).

 

[lolbruh6]

here is the screenshot.

 

[Muggy21]

here is the screenshot.

Does your client have any proof that this was indeed self-defense?

 

[lolbruh6]

the self-defense was of another individual who is not one of the above mentioned in the screenshot

 

[Muggy21]

the self-defense was of another individual who is not one of the above mentioned in the screenshot

Not what I asked you Counselor. Do you have proof of the self-defense.

 

[lolbruh6]

your honor,
we do not have any proof as it was done days before the arrest when the client was still new to the server

 

[Muggy21]

your honor,
we do not have any proof as it was done days before the arrest when the client was still new to the server

I understand being new to the server and everything, but how do you intend on proving something without any evidence?

You'd want this Court to give you $34,000 from the Government when you can't prove the underlying action that the Govt took was in of itself unlawful?



How do you wish to proceed.

 

[lolbruh6]

your honor
my client stated the self-defense as proof that he had only killed one person unrelated to the 2 names mentioned for the charges of his arrest. the govt arrested my client for a crime of different people which he did not commit.

 

[Muggy21]

your honor
my client stated the self-defense as proof that he had only killed one person unrelated to the 2 names mentioned for the charges of his arrest. the govt arrested my client for a crime of different people which he did not commit.

The murder plugin is presumed accurate, you'd need proof that the plugin acted in error.

Do you have that proof.

 

[lolbruh6]

your honor,
this is a screenshot of my client's player statistics on the server. Clearly showing that he has only killed one player
and not two.
this is dated 2 days ago on Sunday 14th June 2026.

 

[Muggy21]

The action is dismissed for want of prosecution and for want of evidence. In order for this action to be sustained, it must overcome the Staff Veto in Muggy21 v. DHS [2025] DCR 86. There must be proof beyond just testimony, in this case a screenshot of the Plaintiff's stats is insufficient.

This action is dismissed without prejudice.