zLost
Citizen
Public Affairs Secretary
Public Affairs Department
Supporter
Oakridge Resident
3rd Anniversary
Grave Digger
Change Maker
Popular in the Polls
zLost
Event Manager
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
- Messages
- 707
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Yeet_Boy (Represented by zLost)
Plaintiff
v.
Department of Public Affairs
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I. PARTIES
1. Yeet_Boy
2. Department of Public Affairs
II. FACTS
1. On 5th July 2025, YeetGlazer offered fellow Event Coordinators to use a build they had made for a previous Squid Game event, to which xDarkkex rudely responded with "GO ON LEAVE" (Exhibit A).
2. On 10th July 2025, YeetGlazer sent coords and screenshots of his build for the Squid Game event (Exhibit B).
3. Following YeetGlazer posting the coords and screenshots, xDarkkex would delete these coords and screenshots, which YeetGlazer questioned to which Darkkex responded by telling YeetGlazer that they did not need him. This caused an argument between YeetGlazer and xDarkkex (Exhibit B).
4. Yeet_Boy joined the argument siding with YeetGlazer. In the middle of the argument, Yeet_Boy saw that YeetGlazer had been banned. (Exhibit C)
5. YeetGlazer was banned from the DPA discord by xDarkkex for the reason that he was not following the DPA code of conduct which required employees to treat each other with respect. (Exhibit D)
6. Yeet_Boy realized that YeetGlazer was banned while still being an employee, and so he unbanned YeetGlazer since he needed to be in the DPA discord to carry out his duties as an Event Coordinator (Exhibit E).
7. YeetGlazer rejoined the server and was fired, following which they were banned for a 2nd time. Yeet_Boy did not unban YeetGlazer this time. (Exhibit F)
8. A while later, Yeet_Boy was given a formal warning by the President for this action. Yeet_Boy gave his justification for his actions in response to this formal warning, which the President disagreed with (Exhibit G).
9. On the 10th of July 2025, Yeet_Boy was fired from the Department of Public Affairs for this action, which he had already been formally warned for. (Exhibit H)
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Commercial Standards Act (link) states:
(1) Unfair dismissal - The unjust termination of an employee. In determining if a termination was unjust, the following criteria must rightfully be considered:
(a) if the employee’s termination made financial sense given the regular business activities and necessity to maintain operations of the terminating party (such as in the case of normal company downsizing);
(b) whether or not the employee’s continued employment would have been a detriment to the workflow, reputation, or legal standing of the business;
(c) whether or not the dismissal was made primarily on the basis of any personally identifiable characteristics, including, but not limited to, gender, race, or political affiliation;
For section (a), there would have been no financial harm to the DPA if Yeet_Boy was kept as an Event Manager.
For section (b), there would have been basically no harm to the workflow, reputation or legal standing of the business. Yeet_Boy did this action with no ill intentions. After the formal warning and the error being fixed (being banned without being fired), Yeet_Boy did not unban YeetGlazer again.
For section (c), we believe that Yeet_Boy’s affiliation with the union was largely taken into account when he was fired for the following reasons:
An anonymous witness reported that xDarkkex, current DPA secretary, was attempting to get rid of union members if they contacted anyone from the event, or if they "disrupted" the event (Exhibit I). Representative Moyfr commented in a public channel, "Like when we were in vc the other day bro was talking about how all the union people are I love DemocracyCraft!ed because he is gathering evidence to find reasons to fire and have them all banned" ("bro" here refers to xDarkkex)(Exhibit J). xDarkkex has also given multiple negative comments about the union (Exhibit K). xDarkkex has also justified baseless claims without evidence to interrogate and threaten union members (Exhibit L). Juniperfig, who was acting in xDarkkex's stead when firing Yeet_Boy, has shown disdain for the union (Exhibit M).
Besides this, a DPA employee was seen maliciously abusing their perms in the DPA discord, which xDarkkex shrugged off since "they were about to quit" (Exhibit N). This DPA employee later decided to not quit, and neither xDarkkex nor juniperfig did anything about this perms abuse.
As we see, Yeet_Boy’'s firing meets all the criteria for being considered an unfair dismissal according to the Commercial Standards Act (link).
Your Honor, I ask you how it's fair for someone who has been in the department for 2+ years, dedicated hundreds of hours into the Department of Public Affairs, been a former DPA secretary, and hosted 20+ events to be fired for an action with no ill intentions, and for this action to be something they had already been formally warned for.
2. The Department of Public Affairs also committed union busting by firing Yeet_Boy, as the Commercial Standards Act (link) states:
(6) Employers who take action to disrupt or prevent the formation of a union, and or engage in conduct to dismantle a union, such as, but not limited to, terminating employees who try to start a union, shall be guilty of Union Busting, as defined:
Union Busting
Employers who take action to disrupt or engage in conduct to dismantle a union.
Per Offence: $2000 Fine
Juniperfig’s actions meet the criteria for union busting in the first clause, as an employee who was in a union was terminated under their stead. Juniperfig’s actions also meet the definition for union busting, as a union member being terminated from the workplace they are attempting to unionize in, disrupts that union. Therefore, Yeet_Boy’s firing was illegal in regards to union busting as well.
3. The Plaintiff is asking for $50,000 in punitive damages as the conduct by xDarkkex and juniperfig during this whole ordeal was outrageous.
4. The Plaintiff is asking for $100,000 in consequential damages in conjunction with the punitive damages as they missed out on being able to host events during summer. Summer is the most active period of the server, and the time when the Plaintiff is most free. They won't get to experience hosting events during summer vacation for a whole year, which is an immense amount of time for DemocracyCraft.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Rehiring of Yeet_Boy to Event Manager.
2. $50,000 in punitive damages.
3. $100,00 in consequential damages for the Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont, as the Plaintiff was unable to host events during a peak time for them (Summer).
WITNESSES
Moyfr
Yeet_Boy
xDarkkex
juniperfig
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 26th day of August 2025.
Attachments
Last edited:
