- Joined
- Jan 19, 2021
- Messages
- 15
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
xstarpro
Plaintiff
v.
Department of State
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
The Department of State, as established by the Modern Legal Board Act, is charged with the carrying out of all elections for the Redmont Bar Association. This includes special elections administered upon the success of votes of no confidence in sitting Councilors or Chairpersons. RBA officials are legally unable to carry out these elections themselves.
Upon the resignation of a string of RBA officials, a situation that would obviously entail a swift special election, the Department of State delayed their action by weeks and only acted after being requested to do so by the sitting Chairperson. The Redmont Bar Association is unable to function at its full potential without a full council and the failure of the Department of State to administer special elections that would once more fill its council in a timely manner ensured the RBA's inactivity.
I. PARTIES
1. xstarpro
2. Department of State
3. Redmont Bar Association
4. Milqy, Chairperson
II. FACTS
1. As established by 6.1 of the Modern Legal Board Act, the Redmont Bar Association shall include a four member council of elected barristers or attorneys whose term in office is two months.
2. Further established by 6.5 of the Modern Legal Board Act, all elections pertaining to the aforementioned position of Councilor are to be managed in full by the Department of State in a fair and impartial manner.
3. Additionally established by 9.1 & 9.2 of the Modern Legal Board Act, the Department of State is charged with the execution of special elections in the event of votes of no confidence in either sitting Councilors or the Chairperson.
4. The Redmont Bar Association currently consists solely of 1 Councilor with the final date of activity in either #council-floor, #council-chat or #record-of-motions represented in the following table:
5. Following this string of resignations or removals from the council, declarations for a special election were not called for until 7/11(16 days after Greenish9's last activity and 9 days after Krix's formal resignation).
6. The subsequent declarations for a special election were called for by Chairperson Milqy and Councilor RelaxedGV, not at the behest of the Department of State who would have been charged with handling such an election.
7. Without this action by the Chairperson, it is foreseeable that the Department of State would have abstained from the administration of any special elections until the nominal councilor term in office had expired on 7/20.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Defendant, the Department of State, failed to administer special elections of RBA Councilors following the resignation and removal of three quarters of the sitting council in a timely manner.
2. Under the Modern Legal Board Act, only the Department of State could administer such elections and their inaction left the Redmont Bar Association with only one councilor on a council mandated to be of 4 members for more than a full week, with some councilors being absent for much longer.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Assurances by the Department of State that upon inevitable future absences, resignations, firings, or other form of removal of Councilors or Chairpersons, special elections for the fulfillment of these roles will be administered in a timely manner.
2. Improved oversight by the Department of State into the Redmont Bar Association in a way that makes IV.1 possible; including better channels of communication with DOS officials regarding the departure of RBA Councilors and/or more active monitoring of the RBA's procedures by DOS officials in a way that allows said DOS officials to recognize resignations or removals in a timely manner.
Lastly, the Plaintiff brings this case to the court in hopes that its ruling may clarify the validity of the assumption that under the current Modern Legal Board Act, the Department of State is obligated to oversee the special election of RBA Councilors and/or Chairpersons as seen in the Modern Legal Board Act's 9.1 & 9.2.
The Plaintiff is aware of new legislation currently being drafted that may prevent similar issues in the future but is seeking civil action regardless in hopes of addressing the alleged misconduct by the Department of State.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 12th day of July 2022.
CIVIL ACTION
xstarpro
Plaintiff
v.
Department of State
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
The Department of State, as established by the Modern Legal Board Act, is charged with the carrying out of all elections for the Redmont Bar Association. This includes special elections administered upon the success of votes of no confidence in sitting Councilors or Chairpersons. RBA officials are legally unable to carry out these elections themselves.
Upon the resignation of a string of RBA officials, a situation that would obviously entail a swift special election, the Department of State delayed their action by weeks and only acted after being requested to do so by the sitting Chairperson. The Redmont Bar Association is unable to function at its full potential without a full council and the failure of the Department of State to administer special elections that would once more fill its council in a timely manner ensured the RBA's inactivity.
I. PARTIES
1. xstarpro
2. Department of State
3. Redmont Bar Association
4. Milqy, Chairperson
II. FACTS
1. As established by 6.1 of the Modern Legal Board Act, the Redmont Bar Association shall include a four member council of elected barristers or attorneys whose term in office is two months.
2. Further established by 6.5 of the Modern Legal Board Act, all elections pertaining to the aforementioned position of Councilor are to be managed in full by the Department of State in a fair and impartial manner.
3. Additionally established by 9.1 & 9.2 of the Modern Legal Board Act, the Department of State is charged with the execution of special elections in the event of votes of no confidence in either sitting Councilors or the Chairperson.
4. The Redmont Bar Association currently consists solely of 1 Councilor with the final date of activity in either #council-floor, #council-chat or #record-of-motions represented in the following table:
Milqy | Active |
RelaxedGV | Active |
Avelanie | 7/04 (Removed from council after switching professions while still a sitting councilor.) |
Krix | 7/02 (Formally resigned after becoming a Judge.) |
Greenish9 | 6/26 (The plaintiff is unaware of the pretenses for Greenish's early departure from the council.) |
5. Following this string of resignations or removals from the council, declarations for a special election were not called for until 7/11(16 days after Greenish9's last activity and 9 days after Krix's formal resignation).
6. The subsequent declarations for a special election were called for by Chairperson Milqy and Councilor RelaxedGV, not at the behest of the Department of State who would have been charged with handling such an election.
7. Without this action by the Chairperson, it is foreseeable that the Department of State would have abstained from the administration of any special elections until the nominal councilor term in office had expired on 7/20.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Defendant, the Department of State, failed to administer special elections of RBA Councilors following the resignation and removal of three quarters of the sitting council in a timely manner.
2. Under the Modern Legal Board Act, only the Department of State could administer such elections and their inaction left the Redmont Bar Association with only one councilor on a council mandated to be of 4 members for more than a full week, with some councilors being absent for much longer.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Assurances by the Department of State that upon inevitable future absences, resignations, firings, or other form of removal of Councilors or Chairpersons, special elections for the fulfillment of these roles will be administered in a timely manner.
2. Improved oversight by the Department of State into the Redmont Bar Association in a way that makes IV.1 possible; including better channels of communication with DOS officials regarding the departure of RBA Councilors and/or more active monitoring of the RBA's procedures by DOS officials in a way that allows said DOS officials to recognize resignations or removals in a timely manner.
Lastly, the Plaintiff brings this case to the court in hopes that its ruling may clarify the validity of the assumption that under the current Modern Legal Board Act, the Department of State is obligated to oversee the special election of RBA Councilors and/or Chairpersons as seen in the Modern Legal Board Act's 9.1 & 9.2.
The Plaintiff is aware of new legislation currently being drafted that may prevent similar issues in the future but is seeking civil action regardless in hopes of addressing the alleged misconduct by the Department of State.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 12th day of July 2022.