Lawsuit: In Session Wayne_Kerr12 v. Beloitte [2026] DCR 38

[dodrio3]

Case Filing​

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Wayne_Kerr12 (Represented by Lex Titanum)
Plaintiff

v.

Beloitte
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On the 3rd March 2026, the Plaintiff reached out to the defendant to enquire about services (P-002). The next day, the defendant and plaintiff agreed to a $10,000 retainer, and the Plaintiff paid the fee of $10,000 before the defendant had completed any work (P-003). This agreement was under the pretext that the defendant would do $10,000 worth of work for the fee.

On the 4th of March, the defendant completed one contract for the defendant, but it was agreed that no funds would be subtracted from the retainer due to an alternate agreement(P-004).

On both the 15th, 16th and 30th of March, the Plaintiff reached out to the defendant enquiring about more work that needed to be done, but was met with no response from the defendant(P-005).

I. PARTIES

1. Wayne_Kerr12 - Plaintiff
2. Beloitte - Defendant
3. Musa096 - Beloitte Managing Partner (P-01)
4. nick (XDBH)- Beloitte Managing Partner (P-01)

II. FACTS

1. On the 3rd of March, the Plaintiff reached out to the Defendant, requesting services. (P-002)
2. On the 4th of March, the Defendant Agreed to a $10,000 retainer. (P-003)
3. The Plaintiff paid the Defendant $10,000 for the retainer on the 4th March. (P-003)
4. The Defendant agreed not to take any money from the retainer for the contract completed on the 4th March (P-004)
5. On the 15th,16th and 30th of March, the Plaintiff contacted the defendant, asking about more work and got no response (P-005)

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. On March 4th 2026, the Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a legally binding agreement, where the defendant agreed to provide $10,000 worth of work to the plaintiff in a retainer. On March 4th 2026, the Plaintiff paid the full sum of $10,000. The Defendant breached this contract by failing to provide any services.
2. The Defendants' conduct demonstrates a “substantial departure from acceptable standards of behaviour" by accepting a large sum of money and not completing the work that they agreed upon. This qualified the plaintiff to punitive damages against the defendant.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. $10,000 In Compensationary Damages for the Fee paid for unfulfilled services
2. $15,000 In Punitive Damages for the outrageous actions of the defendant
3. 30% of the cases value or $3,000 which ever is higher, in legal fees paid to Lex Titanium

(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 20th day of April 2026

P-001

P-002

P-003

P-004

P-005

 

[dodrio3]

Proof Of Representation

 

[Franciscus]

Writ of Summons

xbdh (@nick) is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Wayne_Kerr12 v. Beloitte [2026] DCR 38.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[Franciscus]

Court Order

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER — APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM

Consistent with the Public Defense Policy, the Court orders that the public defender program shall represent the defendant.

The Public Defender program shall appear within 72 hours. In that appearance, the Public Defender program shall provide to this Court the name of the individual who will be defending the Defendant.

Should no individuals in the Public Defender program have reasonable availability to take on this case, a statement to that effect shall be provided instead. In such case, or should no suitable response from the public defender program be had in the allotted time, the Court order the Court Clerk solicit private law firms to provide public defense (see: Public Defense Policy, “The Court Clerk… will arrange for quotes from private law firms”).

In the District Court,
Hon. Judge Multiman155

 

[Franciscus]

Court Order

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER — APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM

Consistent with the Public Defense Policy, the Court orders that the public defender program shall represent the defendant.

The Public Defender program shall appear within 72 hours. In that appearance, the Public Defender program shall provide to this Court the name of the individual who will be defending the Defendant.

Should no individuals in the Public Defender program have reasonable availability to take on this case, a statement to that effect shall be provided instead. In such case, or should no suitable response from the public defender program be had in the allotted time, the Court order the Court Clerk solicit private law firms to provide public defense (see: Public Defense Policy, “The Court Clerk… will arrange for quotes from private law firms”).

In the District Court,
Hon. Judge Multiman155

Court Order

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER — APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM

The Court sees no response from the Public Defender Program. In line with the Court's prior order, we will proceed to find a public defender in other ways.

In line with the Public Defence Policy, The Court Clerk ( @PurpleBG ) is ordered to, within 48 hours, reach out to and solicit quotes from private law firms and private solo law practitioners to serve as public defender in this case. The Court Clerk may seek the assistance of any Magistrate in soliciting bids, but the primary responsibility shall be on the Court Clerk.

No bid under $4,500 shall be accepted, in line with the Public Defence Policy. The Court Clerk shall accept the first bid of a competent and qualified lawyer at $4,500 and assign them to this case; if none are received, the Court Clerk shall, after 72 hours have elapsed from the time of this order, notify the Court of bids received and assign the lowest qualified and competent bid to this case as public defender, provided that such a bid is at or above the minimum price of $4,500. If two or more bids are at the same, lowest eligible amount, the Court Clerk shall pick one according to the Court Clerk’s best judgement and assign the winner to this case.

If no bids by a qualified and competent lawyer that meet the price criteria are received within 72 hours of the issuance of this Order, the Court Clerk shall inform the Court of the names of the firms and individuals whom the Court Clerk has reached out to during that time. In such an event, the District Court will randomly pick and assign a public defender not on leave of absence to this case.

In the District Court,
Hon. Judge Multiman155

 

[Dartanboy]

Court Order

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER — APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM

The Court sees no response from the Public Defender Program. In line with the Court's prior order, we will proceed to find a public defender in other ways.

In line with the Public Defence Policy, The Court Clerk ( @PurpleBG ) is ordered to, within 48 hours, reach out to and solicit quotes from private law firms and private solo law practitioners to serve as public defender in this case. The Court Clerk may seek the assistance of any Magistrate in soliciting bids, but the primary responsibility shall be on the Court Clerk.

No bid under $4,500 shall be accepted, in line with the Public Defence Policy. The Court Clerk shall accept the first bid of a competent and qualified lawyer at $4,500 and assign them to this case; if none are received, the Court Clerk shall, after 72 hours have elapsed from the time of this order, notify the Court of bids received and assign the lowest qualified and competent bid to this case as public defender, provided that such a bid is at or above the minimum price of $4,500. If two or more bids are at the same, lowest eligible amount, the Court Clerk shall pick one according to the Court Clerk’s best judgement and assign the winner to this case.

If no bids by a qualified and competent lawyer that meet the price criteria are received within 72 hours of the issuance of this Order, the Court Clerk shall inform the Court of the names of the firms and individuals whom the Court Clerk has reached out to during that time. In such an event, the District Court will randomly pick and assign a public defender not on leave of absence to this case.

In the District Court,
Hon. Judge Multiman155

Your honor,

I apologize for the delay, as you know I was at a wedding this weekend IRL, and the Public Defender I assigned to appear has failed their duty.

If you would allow it, I can reassign this case.

 

[Franciscus]

Your honor,

I apologize for the delay, as you know I was at a wedding this weekend IRL, and the Public Defender I assigned to appear has failed their duty.

If you would allow it, I can reassign this case.

If no valid bids have thus far been received, sure. If there has been someone who has made a qualifying bid, the Court will let them represent here. Please coordinate with the Court Clerk on this point.

 

[dodrio3]

If no valid bids have thus far been received, sure. If there has been someone who has made a qualifying bid, the Court will let them represent here. Please coordinate with the Court Clerk on this point.

Would it be possible to put another time limit on this matter to ensure that the court is able to provide a speedy trial.

 

[Franciscus]

Would it be possible to put another time limit on this matter to ensure that the court is able to provide a speedy trial.

None is necessary. There is already a time limit implicit in the order to the Court Clerk, from whom we should hear by tomorrow at 2:31 AM Eastern Daylight Time.

 

[Franciscus]

The Court Clerk has informed the Court that a bid from Gribble19 (@gribble19) has been accepted. She shall represent the Defendant.

The Defense shall provide an answer to complaint in the next 72 hours.