Lawsuit: Pending Vernicia v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 100

[ameslap]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

The Plaintiff in the upcoming proceeding requests an Emergency Injunction ordering the immediate release of Vernicia from prison and temporarily suspending the enforcement of her remaining sentence pending the resolution of this case.

On September 30, 2026, DHS obtained an arrest warrant against Vernicia, which was executed on October 12, 2026, outside the 10-day service window established by the Judiciary's Court Orders Guide.

As a result, Vernicia has been sentenced to 21 hours of imprisonment and currently has around 6.5 hours remaining on this sentence. Every minute served cannot be restored should the Plaintiff be successful.

We are challenging the legality of the warrant's execution under Part XI, Section 1 and Section 5 of the Redmont Civil Code Act and Part V, Section 35 of the Constitution.

In [2025] DCR 93, the Court granted temporary relief preventing DHS from enforcing imprisonment while the case was ongoing; we ask for that as well.

Thank you,
Ameslap

 

[ameslap]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Vernicia
Plaintiff

V.

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) unlawfully executed an arrest warrant outside the period established by the Judiciary’s published warrant rules, resulting in wrongful arrest, imprisonment, and the violation of Vernicia’s constitutional rights.

I. PARTIES
1. Vernicia, Plaintiff
2. The Commonwealth of Redmont, Defendant

II. FACTS
1. On or around June 23, 2026, DHS issued wanted points against Vernicia for 129 counts of Unauthorized Firearms Possession.

2. On August 30, 2026, DHs requested an arrest to enter Vernicia’s private property and enforce the outstanding jail sentence.

3. On September 30, 2026, Judge CreeperTD approved the warrant for a specified list of properties owned or rented by Vernicia, requiring a return of the warrant within one week.

4. The Judiciary’s Court Orders Guide establishes that warrants must be served within 10 days unless otherwise provided by the Court.

5. The 10-day period for the warrant in question is September 30, 2026 to October 10, 2026.

6. On October 12, 2026, DHS executed the warrant at plot C995, arrested Vernicia, and imprisoned her.

7. DHS subsequently filed a return acknowledging that it had been submitted late.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. WRONGFUL ARREST
Part XI, Section 5 of the Redmont Civil Code Act defines Wrongful Arrest or Detention as a law enforcement officer's arrest or detention of an individual without lawful authority.

Part IV, Section 4 of the Judicial Standards Act permits authorized DHS officers to enter private property and arrest wanted individuals pursuant to an Arrest Warrant.

The Judiciary’s Court Orders Guide establishes that warrants must be served within 10 days.

In [2026] FCR 94, Judge CreeperTD relied upon the Judiciary’s rulemaking authority and judicial guidance when interpreting the lawful scope of search warrants. However, following Vernicia’s arrest, Judge CreeperTD ruled that warrants do not expire unless a specific expiration date is given, without addressing the Judiciary’s published 10-day requirement.

Due to all of this, a warrant cannot authorize government action indefinitely where judicial procedures restrict the period in which that action must be performed. The warrant in question did not provide the DHS lawful authority for the October 12 arrest.

2. VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
Part XI, Section 1 of the Redmont Civil Code Act gives liability to an individual who deprives another of rights secured by the Constitution.

Part V, Section 35(14) of the Constitution guarantees the right to liberty and security of the person.

DHS acted beyond its lawful authority when entering private property, arresting Vernicia, and depriving Vernicia of liberty after the warrant against them expired.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
PRIMARY RELIEF
1. $50 per minute for the period of actual imprisonment resulting from unlawful execution of the arrest warrant. As of this posting, Vernicia has been imprisoned for around 870 minutes, resulting in relief of $43,500

In [2025] FCR 11, the Court awarded compensation under Part 1, Section 6(1)(c) of the Criminal Code Act where the plaintiff was unlawfully sentenced despite guilt for the offense. Here, we are requesting the same reasoning for compensation for imprisonment resulting from an unlawfully executed warrant.

2. Legal Fees

ALTERNATIVE RELIEF
Should the court determine that the $50 per minute rate is not applicable, the Plaintiff requests:
1. $10,000 in consequential damages.
2. $15,000 in punitive damages.
3. Legal fees.

EVIDENCE
P-001 - Warrant Transcript

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 18th Day of October 2026.