Lawsuit: Pending UntitledSteve v. _blitzS1 [2026] DCR 129

U

UntitledSteve

Citizen
UntitledSteve
UntitledSteve
Armourer
Joined
May 27, 2026
Messages
8

Case Filing​


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


UntitledSteve
Plaintiff

v.

_blitzS1
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF


I. PARTIES
1. ziazX (Lawyer for the case)
2. RealGamer203 (Witnessed me coming to the shop first)

II. FACTS
1. In the first and second photo, you can clearly see _blitzS1 also known as Cool Girl say "first to come to my shop gets {money}"

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. With me clearly being in the shop first, not only did she kill me but she also refused to pay me

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. The original 1.5k promised to the first person to come to the shop which is me
2. Another 2k for emotional distress

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 29th day of July 2026
MedalTVMinecraft20260728174119503.png
MedalTVMinecraft20260728190227812.png
MedalTVMinecraft20260728191527973.png
 
Last edited:
UntitledSteve said:
i do have a lawyer
Click to expand...
hopefully they would have posteed for u in the right way
Courts

Guide Thread 'Templates'

TEMPLATES

You must use the following templates during your cases.

CIVIL ACTION

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


(your name)
Plaintiff

v.

(who you are suing)
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF


I. PARTIES
1. (Name everyone who is a party in this case.)
2. ...

II. FACTS
1. (Explain what happened.)
2. ...
3. ...

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. (Why these facts give rise to a claim. Explain which laws were broken if...

  • Like
 
theman_Youfeelme said:
hopefully they would have posteed for u in the right way
Courts

Guide Thread 'Templates'

TEMPLATES

You must use the following templates during your cases.

CIVIL ACTION

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


(your name)
Plaintiff

v.

(who you are suing)
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF


I. PARTIES
1. (Name everyone who is a party in this case.)
2. ...

II. FACTS
1. (Explain what happened.)
2. ...
3. ...

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. (Why these facts give rise to a claim. Explain which laws were broken if...

  • Like
Click to expand...
edited
 
The Defendant responds to the Plaintiff's complaint as follows:
I. ADMISSIONS AND DENIALS
  1. Admitted: The Defendant admits to running an in-game promotional chat broadcast.
  2. Denied: The Defendant strictly denies that the Plaintiff is entitled to any prize money, restitution, or consequential damages due to his own illegal, disruptive, and bad-faith conduct.
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
  1. At the time of the incident, the Defendant was operating a commercial business under severe external stress due to being actively targeted and repeatedly killed by other players at the location.
  2. The Plaintiff entered the shop not as a legitimate consumer, but to take advantage of this high-stress situation by intentionally harassing the Defendant, spamming the chat, and badgering customers with repetitive threats of litigation.
  3. The Defendant explicitly revoked the Plaintiff's right of entry and ordered the Plaintiff to leave the property.
  4. In a desperate attempt to mitigate the disruption and protect the safety of the business, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff $600 directly on the express, mutual agreement that the Plaintiff would leave the premises.
  5. The Plaintiff took the $600, pocketed it, and deliberately breached the agreement by refusing to leave, continuing to trespass and aggressively badger the Defendant. The subsequent killing was a lawful removal of an active trespasser.
III. DEFENCE AGAINST CLAIMS
  1. Unlawful Trespass and Revocation of License (Part VII, Sec 3):
    Under Part VII, Section 3 of the Redmont Civil Code Act, a person commits a civil violation if they remain on land in the possession of another without consent. The moment the Defendant ordered the Plaintiff to leave, his legal license to be there was revoked. A business owner owes absolutely zero promotional rewards to an active, hostile trespasser breaking property laws on their storefront floor.
  2. Lawful Excuse for Non-Performance due to Duress & Bad Faith (Part VI, Sec 1):
    Under Part VI, Section 1(a), a breach of contract can only be sustained if obligations are unfulfilled "without lawful excuse". Section 1(e) establishes that contracts are voidable if a party is forced or induced into circumstances via duress. The Plaintiff used relentless harassment to extort a $600 payout from a distressed player and then refused to leave. This bad-faith behavior legally dissolves any unilateral promotional agreement.
  3. Frivolous Claim for Emotional Distress (Part III, Sec 5):
    The Plaintiff demands $2,000 for emotional distress under Consequential Damages. Under Part III, Section 5(2)(a), consequential damages require proof on a balance of probabilities that a reasonable person would suffer genuine humiliation or distress. The Plaintiff was the aggressive extortionist in this interaction. An individual cannot target a business owner, break a cash-settled agreement to leave, and then claim "emotional distress" when they are forcibly removed.
IV. COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF
  1. Unjust Enrichment (Part X, Sec 1):
    The Defendant formally files a counterclaim against the Plaintiff for Unjust Enrichment. The Plaintiff unethically obtained and retained a benefit of $600 from the Defendant's balance under the false pretense that he would leave the property. Because the Plaintiff took the cash and stayed, there is zero legal justification for him to retain those funds.
V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Defendant respectfully requests the Court to:
  1. Dismiss the Plaintiff's claim for $1,500 in its entirety due to active trespass and duress.
  2. Dismiss the Plaintiff's claim for $2,000 for emotional distress as entirely frivolous.
  3. Under Part III, Section 7(2)(e), enter a full judgment in favor of the Defendant and award the Defendant the statutory minimum of $6,000 in Legal Fees, to be paid entirely by the Plaintiff for filing an abusive, bad-faith lawsuit.
DATED: This 30th day of July 2026
SUBMITTED BY: _blitzS1

 
Last edited:
Cool GIrl said:
The Defendant responds to the Plaintiff's complaint as follows:
I. ADMISSIONS AND DENIALS
  1. Admitted: The Defendant admits to running an in-game promotional chat broadcast.
  2. Denied: The Defendant strictly denies that the Plaintiff is entitled to any prize money, restitution, or consequential damages due to his own illegal, disruptive, and bad-faith conduct.
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
  1. At the time of the incident, the Defendant was operating a commercial business under severe external stress due to being actively targeted and repeatedly killed by other players at the location.
  2. The Plaintiff entered the shop not as a legitimate consumer, but to take advantage of this high-stress situation by intentionally harassing the Defendant, spamming the chat, and badgering customers with repetitive threats of litigation.
  3. The Defendant explicitly revoked the Plaintiff's right of entry and ordered the Plaintiff to leave the property.
  4. In a desperate attempt to mitigate the disruption and protect the safety of the business, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff $600 directly on the express, mutual agreement that the Plaintiff would leave the premises.
  5. The Plaintiff took the $600, pocketed it, and deliberately breached the agreement by refusing to leave, continuing to trespass and aggressively badger the Defendant. The subsequent killing was a lawful removal of an active trespasser.
III. DEFENCE AGAINST CLAIMS
  1. Unlawful Trespass and Revocation of License (Part VII, Sec 3):
    Under Part VII, Section 3 of the Redmont Civil Code Act, a person commits a civil violation if they remain on land in the possession of another without consent. The moment the Defendant ordered the Plaintiff to leave, his legal license to be there was revoked. A business owner owes absolutely zero promotional rewards to an active, hostile trespasser breaking property laws on their storefront floor.
  2. Lawful Excuse for Non-Performance due to Duress & Bad Faith (Part VI, Sec 1):
    Under Part VI, Section 1(a), a breach of contract can only be sustained if obligations are unfulfilled "without lawful excuse". Section 1(e) establishes that contracts are voidable if a party is forced or induced into circumstances via duress. The Plaintiff used relentless harassment to extort a $600 payout from a distressed player and then refused to leave. This bad-faith behavior legally dissolves any unilateral promotional agreement.
  3. Frivolous Claim for Emotional Distress (Part III, Sec 5):
    The Plaintiff demands $2,000 for emotional distress under Consequential Damages. Under Part III, Section 5(2)(a), consequential damages require proof on a balance of probabilities that a reasonable person would suffer genuine humiliation or distress. The Plaintiff was the aggressive extortionist in this interaction. An individual cannot target a business owner, break a cash-settled agreement to leave, and then claim "emotional distress" when they are forcibly removed.
IV. COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF
  1. Unjust Enrichment (Part X, Sec 1):
    The Defendant formally files a counterclaim against the Plaintiff for Unjust Enrichment. The Plaintiff unethically obtained and retained a benefit of $600 from the Defendant's balance under the false pretense that he would leave the property. Because the Plaintiff took the cash and stayed, there is zero legal justification for him to retain those funds.
V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Defendant respectfully requests the Court to:
  1. Dismiss the Plaintiff's claim for $1,500 in its entirety due to active trespass and duress.
  2. Dismiss the Plaintiff's claim for $2,000 for emotional distress as entirely frivolous.
  3. Under Part III, Section 7(2)(e), enter a full judgment in favor of the Defendant and award the Defendant the statutory minimum of $6,000 in Legal Fees, to be paid entirely by the Plaintiff for filing an abusive, bad-faith lawsuit.
DATED: This 30th day of July 2026
SUBMITTED BY: _blitzS1

Click to expand...
Do you have any proof for that?
 
Cool GIrl said:
The Defendant responds to the Plaintiff's complaint as follows:
I. ADMISSIONS AND DENIALS
  1. Admitted: The Defendant admits to running an in-game promotional chat broadcast.
  2. Denied: The Defendant strictly denies that the Plaintiff is entitled to any prize money, restitution, or consequential damages due to his own illegal, disruptive, and bad-faith conduct.
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
  1. At the time of the incident, the Defendant was operating a commercial business under severe external stress due to being actively targeted and repeatedly killed by other players at the location.
  2. The Plaintiff entered the shop not as a legitimate consumer, but to take advantage of this high-stress situation by intentionally harassing the Defendant, spamming the chat, and badgering customers with repetitive threats of litigation.
  3. The Defendant explicitly revoked the Plaintiff's right of entry and ordered the Plaintiff to leave the property.
  4. In a desperate attempt to mitigate the disruption and protect the safety of the business, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff $600 directly on the express, mutual agreement that the Plaintiff would leave the premises.
  5. The Plaintiff took the $600, pocketed it, and deliberately breached the agreement by refusing to leave, continuing to trespass and aggressively badger the Defendant. The subsequent killing was a lawful removal of an active trespasser.
III. DEFENCE AGAINST CLAIMS
  1. Unlawful Trespass and Revocation of License (Part VII, Sec 3):
    Under Part VII, Section 3 of the Redmont Civil Code Act, a person commits a civil violation if they remain on land in the possession of another without consent. The moment the Defendant ordered the Plaintiff to leave, his legal license to be there was revoked. A business owner owes absolutely zero promotional rewards to an active, hostile trespasser breaking property laws on their storefront floor.
  2. Lawful Excuse for Non-Performance due to Duress & Bad Faith (Part VI, Sec 1):
    Under Part VI, Section 1(a), a breach of contract can only be sustained if obligations are unfulfilled "without lawful excuse". Section 1(e) establishes that contracts are voidable if a party is forced or induced into circumstances via duress. The Plaintiff used relentless harassment to extort a $600 payout from a distressed player and then refused to leave. This bad-faith behavior legally dissolves any unilateral promotional agreement.
  3. Frivolous Claim for Emotional Distress (Part III, Sec 5):
    The Plaintiff demands $2,000 for emotional distress under Consequential Damages. Under Part III, Section 5(2)(a), consequential damages require proof on a balance of probabilities that a reasonable person would suffer genuine humiliation or distress. The Plaintiff was the aggressive extortionist in this interaction. An individual cannot target a business owner, break a cash-settled agreement to leave, and then claim "emotional distress" when they are forcibly removed.
IV. COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF
  1. Unjust Enrichment (Part X, Sec 1):
    The Defendant formally files a counterclaim against the Plaintiff for Unjust Enrichment. The Plaintiff unethically obtained and retained a benefit of $600 from the Defendant's balance under the false pretense that he would leave the property. Because the Plaintiff took the cash and stayed, there is zero legal justification for him to retain those funds.
V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Defendant respectfully requests the Court to:
  1. Dismiss the Plaintiff's claim for $1,500 in its entirety due to active trespass and duress.
  2. Dismiss the Plaintiff's claim for $2,000 for emotional distress as entirely frivolous.
  3. Under Part III, Section 7(2)(e), enter a full judgment in favor of the Defendant and award the Defendant the statutory minimum of $6,000 in Legal Fees, to be paid entirely by the Plaintiff for filing an abusive, bad-faith lawsuit.
DATED: This 30th day of July 2026
SUBMITTED BY: _blitzS1

Click to expand...
Also, you've only paid me $400 in vouchers when you specifically stated "dollars"
 
Okay, so I dunno what this docket is, so we'll set some stuff straight.



1) This is the District Court, not the Federal Court.
2) Do not discuss nor argue without direction of this Court.


Functionally, although not following the format, the Defendant has offered a compliant Answer.


That being said, the Court issues the following order:

Court Order


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Order to Show Cause

TO THE PLAINTIFF

The Complaint is deficient, in its current form, and fails to articulate any tort recognizable under the RCCA. In the alternative, the Complaint is too vague as to offer specificity to any common law claim that could be prosecuted.

TO THE DEFENDANT

Please present evidence of any of your claims in your "counterclaim." Furthermore, the "counterclaim" is defficient and won't be recognized as such until you file in compliance with the required format and in compliance with applicable rules/statute.


Both parties have until 8/2/26 at 9pm EDT to comply.

So ordered,
Justice Mug in the District Court

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top