- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
TweedyApple255
Plaintiff
v.
quickrip
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
On 29th of May 2026, the Defendant, quickrip, and the Plaintiff, TweedyApple255, reached a verbal agreement for the buy/sale of a golden drill. After the fulfillment of the first half of the agreement by the plaintiff, the defendant failed to perform their contractual obligation by giving the plaintiff an empty chest. After the receving of the empty chest the plaintiff performed not realizing he got tricked his second half of the agreement.
I. PARTIES
1. TweedyApple255 - Plaintiff
2. quickrip - Defendant
II. FACTS
On May 29, 2026, the Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a legally binding verbal contract for the purchase and sale of one Golden Drill. The terms of the agreement were explicitly established as follows:
●Total Consideration: Green tractor + $3000
● Payment Structure: The Plaintiff agreed to give the green tractor of the total Consideration up front. The remaining $3000 was to be remitted upon the successful delivery of the Golden Drill to the Plaintiff.
● Performance: The Plaintiff successfully fulfilled the first half of the contractual agreement by delivering the green tractor to the Defendant on May 29, 2026. For the second half of the agreement, the Defendant presented the Plaintiff with a chest, leading the Plaintiff to believe the agreed-upon Golden Drill was contained within. Relying on this visual representation, the Plaintiff remitted the $3,000 payment. Upon subsequent inspection, it was discovered that the chest was empty and contained no drill. The Defendant utilized this deceptive "bait-and-switch" tactic to secure the $3,000 payment under false pretenses. The Plaintiff has fulfilled all contractual obligations in good faith, while the Defendant has obtained both the tractor and the $3,000 without fulfilling their end of the bargain.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Breach of Contract: The Defendant entered into a legally binding verbal contract with the Plaintiff to exchange a Golden Drill for a green tractor and $3,000. By failing to deliver the drill and retaining the consideration provided by the Plaintiff, the Defendant has fundamentally breached the terms of the agreement.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1.Specific Performance or Compensatory Damages:
- The return of the green tractor in its original condition plus the $3,000 in cash remitted to the Defendant under false pretenses, OR
- $15,000 in compensatory damages, representing the fair market value of the green tractor, plus the $3,000 in cash remitted to the Defendant under false pretenses.
3. 30% of the total awarded damages in legal fees
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 29th day of May 2026
