Lawsuit: Dismissed totemundying v. Department of Homeland Security

Status
Not open for further replies.

essx

Citizen
Supporter
Oakridge Resident
totemundying
totemundying
Solicitor
Joined
Aug 22, 2023
Messages
35
Case Filing


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


totemundying (Plaintiff)

v.

Department of Homeland Security (Defendant)

COMPLAINT

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
“I was fined $600 on July 9th for 'Illegal Advertising', an offense that Universoul_, a member of the Department of Homeland security previously messaged me about providing me with a verbal warning which implied that if I continue, I will be /fined. I messaged back stating that I was not affiliated with the company name I had mentioned (which in this case meant I had nothing to gain from mentioning their name. full disclosure: I am employed there as a contractor, but that ONLY involves /advertising, not encouraging other people to join), after which I was fined $600.”



I. PARTIES

1. totemundying (plaintiff), an individual that receives nothing from mentioning a company name
2. Department of Homeland Security (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. I told a new member that slashad pays $120 per ad.
2. I was informed in a /msg by Universoul_ that he deemed my message illegal advertising and that if I were to continue I would be /fine d.
3. I responded saying I had no affiliation with slashad (which in this case meant I had nothing to gain from mentioning their name).
4. I did not continue.
5. I was fined $600.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The defendant & its employee has accused me of breaking the law.
2. The defendant & its employee has given me a warning implying I wouldn't be fined this time, then fined me $600.
3. The defendant & its employee gave me emotional distress by scrutinizing my speech.
4. The defendant & its employee has caused me emotional distress.
5. The defendant & its employee has committed police misconduct.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Compensation of $600 for the fine.
2. Removing the false charge off my police record.
3. Compensation of $15,000 for the loss of time I have suffered by having to research and create a case against the defendant.
4. Compensation of $5,000 for the emotional distress the defendant & its employee have caused me to suffer.
5. Compensation of $4,000 for the damage to my reputation as a person that might negatively affect my quality of life on the server.
6. A clear & defined outline of what the DHS and its employees consider illegal advertising so other members of the server don't continue to be robbed by the DHS.

Total of compensation totals up to $24,600

EVIDENCE

Exhibit P-001
Screenshot 2026-07-09 at 3.27.23 PM.png
Exhibit P-002
Screenshot 2026-07-09 at 3.13.04 PM.png

Exhibit P-003
Screenshot 2026-07-09 at 3.13.59 PM.png
 

Court Order


This case is dismissed without prejudice as the Plaintiff lacks the legal qualification to practice law in the District Court.

1783636626431.png


Plaintiff, if you wish to file a lawsuit in the District Court you must obtain the Solicitor Qualification, or hire a qualified lawyer to represent you.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top