Lawsuit: Pending TheVeryBoredCat v. Town of Aventura [2026] DCR 56

[Cat Oakridge]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


TheVeryBoredCat
Plaintiff

v.

Town of Aventura
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

Today, I was walking along Anchor Drive in Aventura, when suddenly, I fell into a hole in the pavement and got stuck inside with no way out. The road is owned by the Town of Aventura, and neglecting the safety of any person traveling by foot along the road is the responsibility of the Town itself.

I believe these actions are negligent and dangerous and constitute deprivation of liberty. The Town of Aventura has proven its negligence to the safety of its residents and visitors alike, and such a threat sets bad precedent for towns to neglect simple duties such as road maintenance.

I've been suffering loss of enjoyment after the incident, even avoiding walking on any roads in Aventura because I'm afraid I may fall into a deeper pit where I could fall to my death. The situation was extremely annoying and what's worse was the embarrassment I felt when a staff member teleported to me while I was stuck in the pit, damaging my reputation to the staff as a new member of the server.

I. PARTIES
1. TheVeryBoredCat (Plaintiff)
2. Town of Aventura (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. TheVeryBoredCat was running east on Anchor Drive in the Town of Aventura after fishing.
2. TheVeryBoredCat stumbled into a 3-block long, 1-block wide hole in the road which he was not able to see, centered on or around 2011, 1317
3. TheVeryBoredCat was stuck with no path to escape the pit.
4. Staff member Eenza teleported to TheVeryBoredCat to respond to an unrelated ticket.
5. Staff member Eenza discovered that I had been trapped in the pit, teleported me out, and sealed it shut.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The defendant deprived the plaintiff of their liberty, as described in the Criminal Code Act, when they "unlawfully confine[d] a player or tamed pet without consent or means of exit;"
2. The defendant failed in their public duty to protect people in public spaces, as understood through common law as a major responsibility of the government.
3. The Town of Aventura's Office of Development is obligated under the Town of Aventura's constitution to be "responsible for the town's... infrastructure" and did not fill its constitutional duty to maintain Anchor Drive properly.
4. Most critically, the Town of Aventura is setting a dangerous precedent that may lead to distrust in the town government, through neglecting players' safety while on public infrastructure in three ways: by leaving holes in the road with dangerous pits directly underneath them, refusing to take any precautions to fill in the land under the road, or even at the very least providing a way to escape from said pits.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $1 in nominal damages for deprivation of liberty and governmental neglect.
2. $54,000 in consequential damages for loss of enjoyment.
3. An order to the Town of Aventura to immediately inspect all of its public infrastructure and make repairs to any of it that may result in other players' deprivation of liberty.
4. Legal fees in accordance with the Court's discretion.

V. EVIDENCE

Spoiler: P-001: Plaintiff POV of the hole while attempting to jump out of the pit

Spoiler: P-002: Plaintiff POV of one of the sides of the pit

Spoiler: P-003: Plaintiff's wider POV of the pit

Spoiler: P-004: Plaintiff's POV of the site of the incident after Eenza teleported him outside the hole

Spoiler: P-005: Plaintiff's POV with what block he believes was the center of the three block hole

VI. Witnesses

1. Eenza

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 26 day of May 2026

 

[dearev]

Your honor i wish to file an amicus brief. Given the circumstances of how falling into a hole is in fact not, deprivation of liberty and how the plaintiff could infact get out of the hole by simply running a simple command on chat.