Lawsuit: Adjourned theonenatr v. Richie_Z [2021] DCR 45

[Magills0819]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


theonenatr (The Lovely Law Firm Representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Richie_Z
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

I. PARTIES
1. theonenatr (Plaintiff)
2. Richie_Z (Defendant)
3. TheRukia (Witness)
4. belrovia (Witness)
5. Magills0819 (Counsel)
6. nnmc (Co-Counsel)
7. Mask3D_WOLF (Co-Counsel)
8. AlexanderLove (Advisory Counsel)

II. FACTS
1. The Plaintiff suffered an arrow wound and went to the Hospital for medical attention.
2. He pressed the sign and called for a doctor.
3. The Defendant was online and did not respond.
4. When the Plaintiff asked the Defendant in chat to help him, the Defendant told him to ”get f**ked (asterisks added due to the forums anti-profanity filter, they were not in the original message)”.
5. The Defendant threatened to commit trespass, and discussed being shot with other players, and failed to help the Plaintiff for the next 49 minutes, until TheRukia cured the Plaintiff.
6. During this time, the injury prevented the Plaintiff for killing mobs with his friend, as part of a meat business, which would have earned him ~$200.
7. The Plaintiff, as an Armourer, was also unable to sell or craft guns during this time, which would have earned him ~$300 otherwise.
8. The Plaintiff suffered repeated damage due to this injury, and needed to consume 29 pieces of steak.
9. The Plaintiff's inability to receive treatment for his injury, resulted in unnecessary stress and frustration.


III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Doctors are obligated to "always prioritize treating a patient over personal needs" (Guide - Doctor Guide).
2. The information provided in Section II, and the evidence attached, clearly established the complete opposite of that happened in this case. Therefore, the damages that the Plaintiff suffered as a result of the clearly unlawful actions by Richie_Z are grounds for monetary relief.
3. Creating a negative atmosphere for another player by breaking a law has been recognised as grounds for relief, and I cite mhadser101 v withepanther773 as persuasive precedent (Lawsuit: Adjourned - Mhadsher101 v. Whitepanther773 (Case No. 05-2020-3)).
4. The Defendant did this, and caused the Plaintiff unnecessary stress, frustration, and other emotional distress, by failing to complete his duties as a Doctor.
5. The Plaintiff lost 29 pieces of steak due to the damage that was the direct result of the Defendants unlawful actions, valued at $1 each at the Apex Butchery
6. The Plaintiff was unable to craft and sell guns, which earns him ~$300 an hour, as a direct result of the Defendant’s unlawful actions.
7. The Plaintiff was unable to work for his meat company, which earns him ~$200 an hour, as a direct result of the Defendant’s unlawful actions.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $550 of opportunity costs and steak consumed
3. $2450 for emotional damages
4. $2000 in legal fees

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 28th of July 2021

List of Witnesses:
Doglover2342
Brenditooo
Huney69
TheRukia
Belovria
theonenatr

Evidence Attached

 

[Wuutie]

IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

The Defendant,
Richie_Z, is required to appear before the court in the case of theonenatr vs Richie_Z. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff.

I'd also like to remind both parties to be aware of the Court Rules and Procedures.
​

 

[Wuutie]

I also request evidence that the plaintiff wants to be represented by Magills0819.

 

[nnmc]

Your Honor, speaking in my capacity as Partner at The Lovely Law Firm and co-counsel for the plaintiff, I am attaching proof of consent of representation.

 

[Antatro]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

theonenatr (The Lovely Law Firm Representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Richie_Z (antatro representing)
Defendant

MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendant move that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:
1. The evidence cited by the plaintiff is used to argue that Richie was refusing to show up, while it is merely Relaxed talking in chat, therefore circumstantial. As it is the single piece of evidence linking Richie to the allegations, it being circumstantial warrants the dismissal of the case.
2. This lawsuit has a strong bias placed on it, as admitted, there were other doctors on at the time and they chose to call out one.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: 30th of July 2021

 

[nnmc]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS

This motion to dismiss should NOT be granted. The motion alleges no correct inaccuracies nor any frivolities and should thus not be granted. I will respond to each point made in the motion.

In response to point 1, lack of evidence is not a valid reason to dismiss a case.
In response to point 2, this point is based on a false claim that other doctors were available to help. There were not other doctors on at the time. The Lovely law firm, on behalf of the plaintiff, had to open a Health Department ticket to get another doctor to come online and treat the plaintiff. Therefore there is no “strong bias” as alleged by defendant. Anyways, “strong bias” is not a reason to dismiss.

 

[Antatro]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO THE REBUTTAL

1.In response to point 1, lack of evidence is not a valid reason to dismiss a case.
- 1.The first clause is not due to lack of evidence but rather the classification of the evidence granted not meeting the requirement of the suit.
2. In response to point 2, this point is based on a false claim that other doctors were available to help. There were not other doctors on at the time.
- 2. A strong bias is in-fact eligible for a motion to dismiss due to no proof showing there is no other doctors online at the time.

 

[nnmc]

Objection!

Your Honor, the defendant is speaking out of turn. Court procedure does not allow for a response to a response to a motion to dismiss. I ask that the defendant’s “response to the rebuttal” be stricken from the record and ignored.

 

[Wuutie]

I'm overruling the objection because you answered the motion while not asked either.

 

[Wuutie]

Im going to overrule the motion to dismiss because lack of evidence is not a reason for dismissing a case. We can proceed with witnesses. Does anyone want to call somebody?

 

[nnmc]

Your Honor, I believe we need to do opening statements first?

 

[Wuutie]

Oh yes sorry, the defendant may present his opening statement.

 

[Antatro]

theonenatr (The Lovely Law Firm Representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Richie_Z (antatro representing)
Defendant

I. SHORTHAND REBUTTAL
The plantifs proof provided showed no proof of them having an arrow wound, richie being on at the time of the doctor calling, proof of no other doctors being on at the time, and no proof of them talking to the defendant directly.
With admitting to TheRukia attending them she would have also been ignoring the call unless she got on at a different time, which there is still no proof for

II. COUNTERARGUMENT

The plantiff is suing over the defendant not attending but does not have any proper proof of the things claimed, and is asking way too much for; emotional damages, legal charges, and job "potentials". The defendant was not proven on at the time called but was shows talking in chat, there is also no proof that no other doctors were on at the time, nor is there proof of them talking directly to the defendant as claimed.

 

[Wuutie]

The Plaintiff may present his opening statement now.

 

[Magills0819]

I. RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S SHORTHAND REBUTTAL

• The Defendant claimed that we have not proved that the Plaintiff suffered an arrow wound, we will establish this later.
• The Defendant claimed that we have not proved that the Defendant was online at the time of the doctor calling. However, we provided this proof in the screenshot named proof of failure to respond 2.
• The Defendant claimed that we have provided no proof of no other doctors being on at the time. belrovia will be testifying that that nnmc needed to create a DoH ticket to get the Plaintiff treated, even if she did not, the doctors' guide does not have an exemption to a doctor's responsibility to act if other doctors are online.
• Finally, the Defendant claimed that we have provided no proof of the Plaintiff talking to the defendant directly. You can see this communication in Proof of Failure to Act and Proof of Failure to Act 2, in any case it is irrelevant, as our client called for the doctor.

II. OPENING STATEMENT

• Our evidence will establish that the Plaintiff suffered an arrow wound and has established that the Plaintiff went to the hospital for medical attention.
• Our evidence established that the Plaintiff called for a doctor, and Richie_Z failed to respond.
• Our evidence established that the Plaintiff asked the Defendant to fulfill his duties as a doctor, and help his arrow wound, but the Defendant tells him to “get f**ked”.
• Our evidence established that the Plaintiff was unable to work with his friend in his meat business to earn $200, and his work as an Armourer for $300.
• Our evidence established that the Plaintiff was extremely stressed and frustrated by his inability to get his serious injury treated.
• TheRukia will testify that she needed to get online to treat the Plaintiff.
• belrovia will testify that nnmc opened a DoH ticket with her, to get TheRukia to treat the Plaintiff.

 

[Wuutie]

The plaintiff presented a list of witnesses to testify, does the defendant want any witnesses?

 

[nnmc]

Your Honor, it has been over 48 hours since you asked for the defendant’s witnesses. There has been no response at all. I request that the court set a deadline for the defendant to request witnesses, in order to keep this case moving at an appropriate speed.

 

[Wuutie]

Noted, I give the defendant 24 hours to respond otherwise we will continue.

 

[Antatro]

I appoligize your honor,
No we would not like to call any witnesses

 

[Wuutie]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@Doglover2342 , @Brenditooo , @huney69 , @TheRukia , @Belovria and @theonenatr are hereby summoned to the District Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont in Case No. 07-2021-29 as witnesses. Please familiarize yourself with the case as it stands at present. You will receive questions from the Plaintiff and may also be cross-examined.

I would ask that the Defence provides a list of all the questions they want answered by each witness in a single post. If some questions need to be withheld as they depend on answers given to earlier questions, that is also considered reasonable. When the Defence is ready, they may post questions to the witness.

I am hereby informing each witness to ensure they are aware of the provisions of the law of perjury and its severity. Giving knowingly false testimony is highly illegal. Witnesses are required to tell the truth in their testimonies, pursuant of the Perjury Act.

Once the witnesses have been questioned, the opposing party will have the opportunity to cross-examine.​

 

[huney69]

Present

 

[theonenatr]

Present.

 

[Belovria]

Present.

 

[Brenditooo]

Present.

 

[Wuutie]

Since 2 witnesses, DogLover2342 and TheRukia, failed to appear in front of court, I will order The Department of Justice to enforce the law:
Contempt in Court
This will be enforced for the coming 7 days,

The Plaintiff may start questioning the witnesses available.

 

[Magills0819]

Thank you, Your Honour.

huney69:
1. Do you agree that the screenshot Sale of Wine is an accurate description of the deal you made?

theonenatr
1. What was the impact on you emotionally of having to wait so long to be treated?

Belovria
1. Do you agree that DoH Tickets 1 - 4 (attached) are an accurate desription of your communication wih nnmc?
2. Do you agree that doctors have a responsibility to treat patients, as you implied in the ticket?

Brenditooo
1. Do you agree that Sale of Gun (attached) is an accurate description of the deal you made?

Your Honour, I have also attached Proof of Gun Sale 2, which I would have questioned DogLover2342, and would like to enter into evidence.

 

[huney69]

Yes that is an accurate description of the deal we made.

 

[theonenatr]

The impact on me was that I had a headache from having to deal with this, waiting so long to be helped that I couldn't see or move much and my friend was wanting to hunt just was frustrating.

 

[TheRukia]

I am in attendance and have familiarized myself with the case

 

[Wuutie]

The Plaintiff may now ask questions to TheRukia as well, I give the witness then 48 hours to respond. The other witness will be fined if they don’t answer within 24 hours from now.

 

[Belovria]

Apologies for the late reply, as I just returned from my break. With reference to Magills0819's questions,

1. I do agree that the screenshots provided are an accurate, and the only description of my communication with nnmc of this incident.
2. Yes, all doctors are required to attend to patients. In the beginning of a doctor's training, we stress the importance of putting a patient's health before one's very own interests. That said, failing to pursue their responsibilities is not at all tolerated.

 

[RelaxedGV]

Your honor, The defendants lawyer is no longer able to take this case, therefore I will be taking it. Generic_Eagle is Richie_Z's Discord name

 

[RelaxedGV]

Your Honor, May I ask for 48 hours to familiarize myself with this case.

 

[Wuutie]

Well the Plaintiff still needs to ask his questions to one witness so don’t worry about time. But I’m going to grant it.

 

[RelaxedGV]

Your Honor, May I summon 2 witnesses after the plaintiff is done asking questions?

 

[Wuutie]

Yes but wait after the plaintiffs witnesses

 

[Mask3D_WOLF]

Your honor, speaking in my capacity as Associate at The Lovely Law Firm and co-counsel for the plaintiff, as Magills0819 cannot get into the forums, I will be questioning TheRukia. I will keep the court updated on when Magills0819 can get back to the forums.


Question(s) for TheRukia:
1. Can you confirm that you treated our client?

 

[TheRukia]

Yes I can confirm that I attended them

 

[Wuutie]

@Brenditooo please answer in the next 24 hours or you will be fined. If he doesn't answer, then the defendant may ask questions to the witnesses. Please hold it short.

 

[Brenditooo]

yes i can confirm that you sold me a minigun with 150 5.56 NATO round bullets and a homing RPG

 

[Wuutie]

The Defendant may ask questions to witnesses now. You have 24 hours to do so.

 

[RelaxedGV]

Thank you your Honor,

theonenatr
1. How do you know you had an arrow wound and do you have any way to show to the court you did?
2. Can you show to the court how you got the amount you make on a daily basis?
3. Do you have any proof that this is what you make everyday?
4. If you were suffering an arrow wound why did you not go to a pharmacist and get the cure from them?
5. What company do you work for and do you have a contract showing that you indeed to work for that company?

belovria
1. Do you have any proof of what doctors were on at the time they asked or if the defendant had said they were busy?
2. Do you have a showing of that fact that they did indeed hit the sign and a doctor had agreed to go?

TheRukia
1. Did you get online before the defendant say were busy when the plaintiff hit the sign?
2. Did the defendant say they were busy before you cured the plaintiff?

huney69
1. Do you know if the plaintiff had an arrow wound?
2. Do you know at what time that the trade was made at?

Brenditooo
1. Do you know at what time that the trade was made at?

 

[Brenditooo]

i do not remember what time the trade was made but the date was 7/26/2021

 

[theonenatr]

1. I know I had an arrow wound since one I was hunting mobs with my friend two I can see a skeleton shooting me and /health and I have a screenshot of the arrow wound.
2. Yes I can show the court the amount I make on a daily basis Cause I make a lot each so I make at least 500 per day documented.
3. I do have some proof of some of the deals I make from selling guns and drinks But I was gone for 1 week so I got back only a few days ago and I took a mini-break so I haven't made many sales except auctions of guns and drinks
4. I'm still kinda new and I don't know that there was a pharmacist and I was blind and slow so I did not go to a pharmacist.
5. I do not work for the meat company anymore now so I can't show a contract.
This is proof of an arrow wound

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/869036079175589919/873644314687864892/2021-07-25_18.43.46.png

This is proof I hit the sign

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/869036079175589919/873644181204111390/2021-07-25_18.43.41.png

Proof of sales
Of drinks and guns that are recent

 

[huney69]

1. I do not recall ever seeing an arrow wound.
2. I believe July 25th and Im not sure about the time as there are different time zones and I dont know what time the purchase was made.

 

[TheRukia]

1. I had just got on and seen that someone needed accidence at the hospital right before I called them in doh chat t
they said that they were busy and then I called the patient.
2. yes they did.

 

[Belovria]

1. Do you have any proof of what doctors were on at the time they asked or if the defendant had said they were busy?

I would have to revisit this ticket transcript, as I believe that a Medical Specialist had said something in the transcript as well in regards to the situation. Which may or may not contribute to this matter.

2. Do you have a showing of that fact that they did indeed hit the sign and a doctor had agreed to go?

No. That notification usually shows in chat, but is not recorded for us in the DOH to look at.

I believe that that would be a staff matter, however. In addition to this, if we were to look at a date and time frame of when the patient was (eventually) attended, we can do that.

 

[Wuutie]

The defendant said he would like to summon witnesses? Please give the names now then.

 

[RelaxedGV]

Your Honor, I would like to call Randomboi2000 and Bewoz

 

[Wuutie]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@RandomBoi2000 and @Bewoz are hereby summoned to the District Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont in Case No. 07-2021-29 as witnesses. Please familiarize yourself with the case as it stands at present. You will receive questions from the Plaintiff and may also be cross-examined.

I would ask that the Defence provides a list of all the questions they want answered by each witness in a single post. If some questions need to be withheld as they depend on answers given to earlier questions, that is also considered reasonable. When the Defence is ready, they may post questions to the witness.

I am hereby informing each witness to ensure they are aware of the provisions of the law of perjury and its severity. Giving knowingly false testimony is highly illegal. Witnesses are required to tell the truth in their testimonies, pursuant of the Perjury Act.

Once the witnesses have been questioned, the opposing party will have the opportunity to cross-examine.​

 

[RandomBoi2000]

Present

 

[Bewoz]

Present

 

[Wuutie]

The defendant may list his questions

 

[dygyee]

Your honor, I am now representing Richie_Z as a public defender.

 

[dygyee]

Your honor, I have no questions for the current witnesses Bewoz and Randomboi200, however if you will allow due to the unusual circumstance of switching lawyers multiple times throughout the trial, I would like to cross examine the previous witnesses again.

 

[Wuutie]

Thank you, and granted.

 

[dygyee]

Thank you your honor,

Theonenatr:
1: Where do you sell most of your guns? (In a store or in an auction?)
2: If the answer was in a store, where is your store?
3: If the answer was in an auction, how would you back up your statement that you make $300 per hour selling guns, when you have only sold 2 barrels of guns in auctions that lasted well over 24 hours each, and all you made was $600?
4: What percentage of the $600 you made in auctioning off guns would you estimate was spent making, or buying materials for the guns?
5: How many hours have you worked in both your gun business, and in the meat business?
6: You claim you ate 29 pieces of steak that are $1 each at the Apex Butchery, but did you check other stores for cheaper food?
7: Are you capable, and have you ever worked at the meat company and sold guns at the same time?

Belovria:
1: Is it true that sometimes the sign at the hospital when you request a doctor doesn’t always work properly, and sometimes doesn’t relay the message to the doctors?
2: Is it required by law that doctors must immediately leave what they are doing and help a patient that needs help? If so, what law is that?

 

[dygyee]

Your honor, may the witnesses please have a time limit to answer their questions?

 

[theonenatr]

1: Where do you sell most of your guns? (In a store or in an auction?)

Well I sell some guns in an auction but I sell them by hand mostly so I make a lot of profit from people asking for guns


2: If the answer was in a store, where is your store? No store built yet

3: If the answer was in an auction, how would you back up your statement that you make $300 per hour selling guns, when you have only sold 2 barrels of guns in auctions that lasted well over 24 hours each, and all you made was $600?
Well I Sell most of my guns by hand and the auctions were for a lot of guns, not a few guns or ammo I sell by hand per person and so I make at least $300 per hour now but I don't got screenshots.

4: What percentage of the $600 you made in auctioning off guns would you estimate was spent making, or buying materials for the guns?
I made a lot of profit cause right now I source my own mats but maybe $50 of the $600 I spent on repairing my pickaxe.

5: How many hours have you worked in both your gun business, and in the meat business?
Um maybe 8 hours

6: You claim you ate 29 pieces of steak that are $1 each at the Apex Butchery, but did you check other stores for cheaper food?

Yes, I did but they have a rewards program, and it's pretty cheap so I bought theres.

7: Are you capable, and have you ever worked at the meat company and sold guns at the same time?

I'm capable and I Did work at the meat company and sold guns at the same time.

 

[dygyee]

I would like to restate question 7 to Theonenatr in a more clear way as I do no believe the plaintiff understood what I was trying to ask:
Are you capable and have you worked at both jobs simultaneously? That means selling guns to someone and killing mobs at the exact same time down the the millisecond.

 

[Wuutie]

Questions needs to be answered within 48 hours, starting the time you asked your questions.

 

[theonenatr]

I'm not capable to sell and kill mobs at the same time but I spend some of my time grinding mobs and take a pause when someone needs guns

 

[dygyee]

Your honor it has been 48 hours since I asked my question, and Belvoria has still not answered them.

 

[Wuutie]

Since 1 witness, Belvoria, failed to appear in front of court, I will order The Department of Justice to enforce a fine of 100 dollars a day with a max of 200 dollars in total for being in contempt of court (law 15.10) for Belvoria until she responds.

 

[Belovria]

1: Is it true that sometimes the sign at the hospital when you request a doctor doesn’t always work properly, and sometimes doesn’t relay the message to the doctors?

Though there has been reports of this, I myself have taken matters into my own hands and have found no problems with the sign. I don’t think that this discredits the patient clicking on the sign’s point of if they have called all doctors since I can only speak on my own behalf and to the best of my knowledge

2: Is it required by law that doctors must immediately leave what they are doing and help a patient that needs help? If so, what law is that?

Not by law, that au know of, but it is a Department policy that we enforce. And I believe I have said before that we go over it in training/evaluation, and enforce it.

 

[Wuutie]

Thank you for answering the questions, The closing statement of the Plaintiff must be presented in the next 48 hours. Please follow the time limits so the case can move on.

 

[dygyee]

IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

(Theonenatr)
Plaintiff

v.

(Richie_Z)
Defendant

MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendant move that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:​

1. As stated by Belovria, the head of the Department of Health, it is not illegal for a doctor to not immediately help a patient in need. Due to the fact that it is not illegal, nothing the defendant allegedly did was illegal, and none of the claims for relief are the fault of the defendant.

DATED: This 22nd day of August 2021​

 

[Wuutie]

Does the Plaintiff like to answer the motion? You have 48 hours to do so.

 

[nnmc]

Your Honor, Magills (lead counsel) is currently busy so I (co-counsel) will present the closing statement and response to motion to dismiss.

Response to Motion to Dismiss: In the interests of time, I will respond to the motion to dismiss and provide my closing statement in the same post. Firstly, the defendant already provided a motion to dismiss at the appropriate time in the proceedings which was denied. Secondly, belrovia is not qualified to opine on what is and isn’t illegal, that remains solely the purview of this court, and her evidence to this respect must be disregarded. Not only that, but the legal ramifications of a doctor not treating a patient are the key legal issue here, and should be looked at in full, not merely dismissed on their face. Even without this all, the Defendant did not need to take action that where breaches of criminal law, acting negligently in failing to complete his duties, as prescribed by DoH policy, is adequate for civil compensation, which is a separate issue to criminal punishment. Next, my closing statement.

Closing Statement: In this case, we have proven that the Defendant failed to treat the Plaintiff (see screenahots labelled Failure to Treat etc) when he pressed the sign and asked the Defendant directly, in fact, the Defendant told him to “f**k off“. A DoH ticket had to be opened for the Plaintiff to get treatment, 49 minutes after he originally pressed the doctor sign, which caused the Plaintiff great emotional distress, as established in his testimony and with screenshots of the conversation he had with Lovely Law Firm in his attempt to get treatment. We also established that the Doctor’s Guide clearly establishes a duty for Doctors to treat patients over anything else they might be doing, and promptly, hence there ability to warp. This was emphasised by Belrovia, despite what the Defence claims. While break of this duy may not be a criminal offense, and this duty is not enshrined in legislation, the Defendant’s failure to act in accordance with policy, which resulted in harm, can still result in civil compensation, as I have discussed above.

Thank you.

 

[Wuutie]

The motion to dismiss is hereby denied, the defendant may present his closing statements. This needs to be done within 48 hours or we will move on without it.

 

[dygyee]

Closing Statement:
In this case, the prosecution has proven only that the plaintiff was shot by an arrow and requested medical help. There is no proof that the defendant Richie_Z ever saw this call for help. Richie_Z never said anything along the lines of "sorry I can't help you now." showing that he may not have seen this request for help. The plaintiff also never directly asked the defendant for help.
As for when the defendant said "I love DemocracyCraft! you too," there is no context to show what went on in the earlier parts of this conversation. Due to the fact that the defendant added the word "too" to the end of his phrase, it is likely that someone said I love DemocracyCraft! you to him first. Please do not take this phrase out of context, which is hard to do because there was no context in any of the images.
As for the emotional damages, the plaintiff himself admitted that the emotional damages he was dealing with was a headache which is not considered emotional damage in a court of law.
The prosecution has also failed to show proof of sustainable income. The prosecution showed a few auctions that sold, and for 2 barrels of guns, he made $600 in 48 hours. However that is not a sustainable source of income, and is not paid by the hour. The plaintiff also admitted that he has worked for a total of 8 hours in his more than 3 days and 5 hours of playtime. That is only 10% of the time. What were the chances of him actually working during those 49 minutes?
The prosecution has also added on an extra 2,000 dollars in their prayer for relief for what they call “Legal fees.” Not only are most legal fees a lot less money, but granting legal fees are very rare. This is known as the American rule, and this rule was created to prevent this incident where the prosecution tries to tack on thousands of extra dollars for no reason.
The defense would like to remind the court that the prosecution has to pass what is called the burden of proof which means that they need to prove that every element of this case is more likely to have happened than not.
To summarize, there is doubt as to whether Richie_Z even saw the plaintiffs request for help as he never acknowledged it. There is doubt as to how much money the plaintiff actually earns. There is a doubt as to how much food the plaintiff consumed as there is no proof he ate 29 pieces of steak that were priced at $1 each. However there is no doubt that the plaintiff didn't suffer emotional damages as he could not state what emotional damages he dealt with.
With this all being said, it is fair to say that with all this doubt, the prosecution didn't pass their burden of proof.

 

[Wuutie]

The Court will now go in recess. Thank you both parties for your time and effort put in this case.

 

[Wuutie]

Verdict

IN THE COURT OF COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT

Case No. 07-2021-29

1. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION

a) The Plaintiff suffered an arrow wound in game and wanted to get threated in the hospital. When he reached the hospital he called a doctor but nobody came to threat the Plaintiff.
b) The Defendant was online but did not respond on the call for help and was scolded with the words:" Get f*****!"
c) The Defendant did not help the Plaintiff for another 49 minutes untill another doctor came online.
d) While having an arrow wound the Plaintiff still played on the server which concluded to the following damages:
i) He couldn't kill any mobs for a business that cost him 200 dollars.
ii) Unable to sell guns or craft any gun. (300 dollars)
iii) Consumed 29 steaks and the stress and frustration following.
e) Following the damages the Plaintiff concluded that creating a negative atmosphere for another player by breaking a law has been recognised as grounds for belief through old lawsuits.
f) Doctors have a duty to treat patients over anything else they might be doing.

2. DEFENDANT'S POSITION

a) This lawsuit was biased because there might be more doctors online at the time and only chose one to call out.
b) The Plaintiff doesn't have any proof of the Defendant not attending. The Defendant was not proven online at the time but only showed him talking in chat. There is also no proof of other doctors online at the time, nor the proof of the Plaintiff talking to the Defendant.
c) Following a statement of the witness, TheRukia, was the Defendant busy at the time. Also the witness huney69 never noticed an arrow wound but this was denied by the Plaintiff with evidece.
d) The Defendant may not have seen the call for help and so he is innocent to the crime commited.
e) The prosecution has also failed to show proof of sustainable income. The prosecution showed a few auctions that sold, and for 2 barrels of guns, he made $600 in 48 hours. However that is not a sustainable source of income, and is not paid by the hour. Was he working during these 49 minutes because no proof shows the Plaintiff did.

3. THE COURT'S OPINION

a) The Court believes that the manner of how the Defendant reacted to the situation not what the server stands for. But this isn't a law that can be dealt with in Court because this language is a rule. On the other hand the Court recognises the arrow wound and failure to threat the Plaintiff by the DoH in a reasonable amount of time.
b) The Court recognises the fact that if a doctor is online, he should be attending a patient immediately. This is indeed the duty of every doctor in the DC server and when failed to do so, a punishment can be arranged.
c) The Court believes that that the claim of relief is too exagerated because of not showing the sustainable income.
d) The Plaintiff showed that the Defendant was indeed online on the time being but did not prove he was online on the minecraft server at the time of the events.
e) If the Defendant was online he would have seen the call and so this was not an excuse for the Defendant. There was a negative atmosphere created by the events and if proven so the Defendant would have been punished.
f) We can see on the screenshots/evidence that there is in the chat in front of every word said by the Defendant a VC. This means that this was said in discord and not on the server. The Court can't guarantee with 100% that the Defendant was online and this is why we cant condemn a person when you are not doubtfull about the facts layed out in front of you.

4. THE VERDICT

The Court will rule in favor of the Defendant.

Furthermore the Court thanks each party for their time and effort put in this case. This case is now adjourned.