DETECTIVHOLMES
Citizen
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2023
- Messages
- 101
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
TheFlameEmperor1
Plaintiff
ItsEgo
Co- Plaintiff
v.
PowerCreaper
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
Defendant defrauded the plaintiff by claiming ownership of a plot he does not own, leading to damages of $150,000, The plaintiff lacked ownership of the plot and was unable to deliver it, and refused to return plaintiff’s money, loss of the $150,000 was a significant financial burden on the plaintiff.
I. PARTIES
1. TheFlameEmperor1 (Plaintiff)
2. PowerCreaper (Defendant)
II. FACTS
1. On 20 July, defendant contacted plaintiff on discord, offering S-plot, S046 for sale.
2. Plaintiff shows temptation to purchase the plot.
3. Payment of $150,000 is sent.
4. Defendant acknowledges the received payment and is aware of the transfer of funds.
5. Plaintiff contacts defendant asking for the plot to be transferred and defendant acts clueless and denies any sale.
6. Plaintiff promises legal action.
7. 21 July, Defendant attempts same scam on another person (RavenReap), and again offers S046 for sale, Agreed upon $100,000.
8. RavenReap asks for pretransfer of the plot and defendant refuses.
9. Defendant initiates an explicit, legal contract, and RavenReap writes a confirming statement.
10. RavenReap discovers the Plaintiff’s lack of ownership on the plot, and defendant claims he owes the owner $80,000.
11. Olisaurus123 (plot owner) publicly claims that the defendant’s statement is false.
12. PowerCreaper used the funds to buy a plot (c525) from Plankeeee and resold it to ItsEgo for an $63,000, Promising Co. Plaintiff that they will sell them S046 for $90,000.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
Plaintiff believes defendant violated multiple sections of the RCCA:
1. Breach of Contract
(Redmont Civil Code Act)
An informal, implied contract was created by the plaintiff,
(2) A valid contract is formed when the following legal test is met:
(a) Offer. An offer is a clear and unequivocal communication expressing a party's willingness to enter into a contract, either explicitly stated or reasonably inferred from the circumstances.
(b) Acceptance. Acceptance is the positive and unambiguous response to an offer communicated to the offeror, mirroring the terms of the offer and conveyed through various means.
(c) Consideration. Consideration, an essential element, involves the exchange of something of value between parties, with sufficiency though not necessarily adequacy. Consideration can be tangible or intanglbie.
(d) Intent. Parties must demonstrate a clear intention to create legal obligations for the contract to be valid.
(e) Capacity. Parties entering into a contract must possess the legal capacity to do so. Players with low playtime may lack the capacity to fairly enter a contract.
Defendant and Plaintiff’s contracts met all the legal requirements, thus making it a valid legal contract, and defendant failed to fulfil his legal obligations with Plaintiffs, making defendant liable for the damages.
2. Misrepresentation
(Redmont Civil Code Act)
Defendant lied to the plaintiffs, made false statements about ownership of the plot, Both plaintiffs depended on that information to follow through with their transactions, Plaintiff suffered damages when defendant failed to deliver promised plot. Co-Plaintiff suffered damages since purchase of S046 was promised at a discounted price, if Co-Plaintiff were to purchase c525. Plot was purchased but 2nd end of the deal was not made.
3. Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce
(Redmont Civil Code Act)
The defendant’s conduct was unacceptable, Plaintiffs allege, attempts to defraud multiple people with the same scam. A plot is a good, the defendant’s misleading statements caused Co-Plaintiff to believe that he could take ownership of plot S046 if he bought c525, which he did, but S046 was never the defendants to sell. Defendant’s multiple attempts showed guilt and intent.
4. Failure to Deliver Goods or Services
(Redmont Civil Code Act)
Plaintiff was promised S046, even though the defendant never owned a plot, a plot was still promised. Co-Plaintiff was also promised S046, but it was not delivered. Plaintiff alleges damages for not receiving the plot, while defendant had no legal excuse to provide, or to reverse the contract and return the money paid out.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Rescission of $150,000 (In accord to 2. Misrepresentation’s Remedy in the RCCA)
2. $150,000 in Compensatory Damages (In accord to 3. Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce’s Remedy in the RCCA)
2. $100,000 in Punitive Damages.
3. 30% In Legal Fees
Witnesses and Evidence
1. TheFlameEmperor1
2. ItsEgo
3. RavenReap
4. Olisaurus123
5. beleave17
6. Pikaftalysa
7. Plankeeee (@dracula8920)
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 25 day of July 2026
