Lawsuit: Adjourned The Tello Corporation v. OFF_men [2022] FCR 105

[xeu100]

IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT​

CIVIL ACTION

Tello
Plaintiff

v.

OFF_men
Defendant

COMPLAINT
Plaintiff complains against Defendant as follows: On 7/4/22, Tello loaned out $30,000 with a 3% interest rate to Defendant, OFF_men. This loan was due back on 10/4/2022. It is now 12/27/2022 and Defendant has not made remarks to justify absence of payment.

I. PARTIES
1. Tello
2. OFF_men

II. FACTS
1. Defendant was given a loan of $30,000 ($34,778.22 with interest as of 12/27/2022) on 7/4/2022.
2. The Defendant was to pay back the loan on 10/4/2022
3. The date is 12/27/2022, as the evidence shows the defendant claimed they would make a repayment by the end of October.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The defendant gave their signature on the contract and acknowledged the contract and loan’s existence.
2. The defendant has not fulfilled their part of the contract.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Plaintiff seeks the following from Defendant:
1. $30,000 to repay the original loan
2. $4,778.22 to repay the 3% interest, including the periods past the loan's repayment date as a late fee.

V. EVIDENCE
1. Original Contract

2. Transcript

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 27th day of December, 2022.

 

[Banana]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

The Defendant, @OFF_men, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Tello v. OFF_men [2022] FCR 105.

Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​

 

[Banana]

A default judgment will be entered shortly.

 

[Banana]

Verdict

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Tello v. OFF_men [2022] FCR 105

I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION
1. The Plaintiff and the Defendant entered a contract wherein the Plaintiff provided a loan to the Defendant
2. The Defendant failed to meet their end of the contract.

II. DEFENSE’S POSITION
1. The Defendant failed to appear.

III. COURT’S OPINION
1. It is the opinion of the court that all criteria for a binding contract were satisfied in this instance.
2. The Plaintiff honored their side of the contract, and the Defendant is liable for upholding the terms of the contract as well.

IV. VERDICT
I hereby find in favor of the Plaintiff. I order that the Defendant be fined a total of $34,778.22 by the DOJ and the Plaintiff be unfined the same amount.

The court thanks both parties for their time. This case is hereby adjourned.