- Joined
- Jun 2, 2021
- Messages
- 1,388
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
The Lovely Law Firm
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
On September 9th of 2023, Matthew100x was controversially appointed to the position of Federal Judge. This rushed nomination process as well as the political fallout as a result of it has left the Commonwealth to overlook two critical steps in the process of appointing a Judge. This negligence has led to Matthew being illegitimately being confirmed, when he should not have even been nominated in the first place according to the law. Further, the President of the Senate prematurely terminated the vote in the chamber when one Senator has not voted, and his vote could have affected the outcome of the confirmation.
I. PARTIES
1. The Lovely Law Firm (Plaintiff)
2. The Commonwealth of Redmont (Defendant)
3. Matthew100x (Government Official in Question)
4. Mhadsher101 (President of the Senate)
5. itsBlazeX (Witness)
6. RelaxedGV (Witness)
II. FACTS
1. Matthew100x was nominated by LilDigiVert for the position of Federal Judge before September 9th, 2023.
2. Matthew100x was confirmed by The Senate for the position of Federal Judge on September 9th, 2023.
3. Matthew100x, as of September 9th, 2023, has accrued 146 hours of playtime (6 days and 2 hours).
4. In the confirmation vote, Matthew100x received a nay from senators A__C and xEndeavour, and an aye from Mhadsher101, Nacholibraa, and xLayzur. CivilizedMan did not cast a vote before The President of the Senate called the confirmation to an end.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Judicial Activity Amendment (link) provides that "A Judge, Justice, or Chief Justice must hold the following requirements in order to be nominated to the bench... Judge - has accrued 150 hours and 12 hours of playtime in the last 30 days". Matthew100x has only accrued 146 hours of playtime, not 150. Therefore, his nomination was illicit and against the law. Congress should either repeal this law, which would involve the will of the House of Representatives who so far has been left out of this nomination process, or Matthew100x will need to attain four more hours of playtime to be eligible for the position.
2. CivilizedMan's vote could have affected the outcome of the confirmation. Had he voted nay, the vote would have gone to the Office of the Vice President for the tie to be broken. Disregarding anticipation as to how Vanquish69 would vote in that event, the matter is that she could vote nay and therefore the President of the Senate has done a disservice in calling this vote to an early end. Democratic processes were disrupted as the vote should not have ended, as the vote was not decisive enough to terminate it before all Senators had voted.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Matthew100x to be removed from office.
2. $10,000 in compensatory damages for wasted time and effort lobbying against this nomination, as he should not have even been nominated in the first place.
3. $15,000 in damages for loss of enjoyment in Redmont for all the strife, argumentation, and general negative energy this illicit nomination has brought on the general legal environment. Further, the erosion of democracy because of one of our Senator's input not being taken into consideration when his vote could have changed the outcome of this important issue also gives grounds to this prayer.
4. $15,000 in damages for infliction of emotional distress, as the Lovely Law Firm morale fell low when the Judge was appointed due to his blatant comments expressing his contempt for many of the values Lovely Law stands for. The emotional damages and stress, as well as workplace negative morale, all were undue because of Matthew100x's nomination being illicit.
5. $10,000 in legal fees for the effort in trying this case and for the support of the Lovely Law Firm.
V. EVIDENCE
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 9th day of September, 2023
CIVIL ACTION
The Lovely Law Firm
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
On September 9th of 2023, Matthew100x was controversially appointed to the position of Federal Judge. This rushed nomination process as well as the political fallout as a result of it has left the Commonwealth to overlook two critical steps in the process of appointing a Judge. This negligence has led to Matthew being illegitimately being confirmed, when he should not have even been nominated in the first place according to the law. Further, the President of the Senate prematurely terminated the vote in the chamber when one Senator has not voted, and his vote could have affected the outcome of the confirmation.
I. PARTIES
1. The Lovely Law Firm (Plaintiff)
2. The Commonwealth of Redmont (Defendant)
3. Matthew100x (Government Official in Question)
4. Mhadsher101 (President of the Senate)
5. itsBlazeX (Witness)
6. RelaxedGV (Witness)
II. FACTS
1. Matthew100x was nominated by LilDigiVert for the position of Federal Judge before September 9th, 2023.
2. Matthew100x was confirmed by The Senate for the position of Federal Judge on September 9th, 2023.
3. Matthew100x, as of September 9th, 2023, has accrued 146 hours of playtime (6 days and 2 hours).
4. In the confirmation vote, Matthew100x received a nay from senators A__C and xEndeavour, and an aye from Mhadsher101, Nacholibraa, and xLayzur. CivilizedMan did not cast a vote before The President of the Senate called the confirmation to an end.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Judicial Activity Amendment (link) provides that "A Judge, Justice, or Chief Justice must hold the following requirements in order to be nominated to the bench... Judge - has accrued 150 hours and 12 hours of playtime in the last 30 days". Matthew100x has only accrued 146 hours of playtime, not 150. Therefore, his nomination was illicit and against the law. Congress should either repeal this law, which would involve the will of the House of Representatives who so far has been left out of this nomination process, or Matthew100x will need to attain four more hours of playtime to be eligible for the position.
2. CivilizedMan's vote could have affected the outcome of the confirmation. Had he voted nay, the vote would have gone to the Office of the Vice President for the tie to be broken. Disregarding anticipation as to how Vanquish69 would vote in that event, the matter is that she could vote nay and therefore the President of the Senate has done a disservice in calling this vote to an early end. Democratic processes were disrupted as the vote should not have ended, as the vote was not decisive enough to terminate it before all Senators had voted.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Matthew100x to be removed from office.
2. $10,000 in compensatory damages for wasted time and effort lobbying against this nomination, as he should not have even been nominated in the first place.
3. $15,000 in damages for loss of enjoyment in Redmont for all the strife, argumentation, and general negative energy this illicit nomination has brought on the general legal environment. Further, the erosion of democracy because of one of our Senator's input not being taken into consideration when his vote could have changed the outcome of this important issue also gives grounds to this prayer.
4. $15,000 in damages for infliction of emotional distress, as the Lovely Law Firm morale fell low when the Judge was appointed due to his blatant comments expressing his contempt for many of the values Lovely Law stands for. The emotional damages and stress, as well as workplace negative morale, all were undue because of Matthew100x's nomination being illicit.
5. $10,000 in legal fees for the effort in trying this case and for the support of the Lovely Law Firm.
V. EVIDENCE
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 9th day of September, 2023
