- Joined
- Aug 4, 2026
- Messages
- 3
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
The Forge
Plaintiff
v.
1. roy405
2. PhatCat2200
Defendants
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I was advertising my shop, where I sell bulletproof armor. The plaintiff said he wanted to test it out. We met, i put on the armor. Then he started shooting me with a crossbow, which fires bolts. Not bullets. My armor is advertised and sold specifically as bulletproof. It makes no claims regarding resistance to bolts, arrows, explosives or any other projectile type. it just wasn't tested against the right kind of weapon. When the bolt dealt damage, he started telling people my shop was a scam, even though nothing I advertised was false.
I. PARTIES
1. frodo1005 (CEO - The Forge)
.august4496 (Marketing coordinator - The Forge)
2. roy405
PhatCat2200
II. FACTS
1. frodo1005 posted an advertisement about bulletproof armor
2. roy405 said "lets test that", and proceded to use crossbow (Exhibit 1)
3. After the plaintiff ran away beacuse he didn't want to die, he called it to be a scam (Exhibit 2, 3)
4. In a few minutes the ad poped up again and he again said "frodo1005 is scamming yall, dont buy his "bulletproof armor"" (Exhibit 4)
5. Later the ad popped up once again, and then another ad posted my PhatCat2200 "frodo1005 is a scammer" (Exhibit 5)
6. After being asked by a player Nooneee0 (potential buyer) (Exhibit 5) "how so?" got an answer from PhatCat2200 "its fake, don't buy it" Which most definetly Interfered with the sales. this happened a little while again (no proof) Which again safe to say, impacted the reputation of the seller and made him seem untrustworthy
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. False accusation (CCA part III section 5) - The defendant falsly accuses the plaintiff of selling fake bulletproof armour, with invalid proof
2. Defamation (Civil CA part V section 1) - roy405 makes a statement in chat saying "don't buy it, its a scam"
3 Libel (Civil CA part V section 2) - PhatCat2200 makes an advertisment calling the plaintiff a scammer after the plaintiff posted another ad promoting the product
4 Slander (Civil CA part V section 3) - The defendant falsly accuses the plaintiff of selling fake bulletproof armour, with flase and
misleading accusations
V. Evidence
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
Exhibit 3
Exhibit 4
Exhibit 5
Exhibit 6
Exhibit 7
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $7000 in compensatory fees
2. Any further remedy the court deems just and proper.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: 07.08.2026
Last edited: