Lawsuit: Adjourned Tello v. SquigglyTulip35 [2022] DCR 50

[Cooleagles]

IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT​

CIVIL ACTION


Tello (Cooleagles Representing)
Plaintiff

v.


SquigglyTulip35
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: My client, Tello, and the Defendant, SquigglyTulip35 or Mort on Discord, reached an agreement in which my client would loan out $2,000 with a 5% interest ($2,100). We have previously sued the Defendant for not paying back this loan; however, we dropped the suit due to the Defendant’s willingness to pay back the debt. It has now been months and the Defendant has lost all communication and clearly has no intentions of paying back.

I. PARTIES
1. Tello
2. SquigglyTulip35

II. FACTS
1. The Defendant was given a loan of $2,000 ($2,100 with interest) on April 20th, 2022.
2. The Defendant was to pay back the loan, in full, a month following receiving the loan, May 20th, 2022.
3. On June 6th, my client launched a lawsuit against the Defendant for not paying back said loan. This suit was then dropped since the Defendant wanted to pay back the loan.
4. It is now October and all communication with the Defendant has ceased.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The defendant gave their signature on the contract and acknowledged the contract and loan’s existence.
2. The defendant has not fulfilled their part of the contract.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $2,000 to repay the original loan
2. $100 to repay the 5% interest
3. $500 for legal fees

V. EVIDENCE
1. Proof of Representation -

2. Original Ticket Transcript (Includes Contract & Signage) - Here

3. Original Court Case - Here


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 16th day of October 2022

 

[Aladeen]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@SquigglyTulip35 is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Tello v. SquigglyTulip35 [2022] DCR 50. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​

 

[Aladeen]

Verdict

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Tello v. SquigglyTulip35 [2022] DCR 50

I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. Defendant did not pay the loan after several months from the original date.
2. Communication between the plaintiff and defendant has ceased after 4 months of the original date.
3. The Defendant has failed to pay back the loan even after they showed initiative to do so.

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. Did not appear before the court.

III. THE COURT OPINION
1. While it is true that the defendant has failed to pay back the loan, we need to consider the statute of limitations act which states ''(b) Civil action must be commenced must be commenced within two months of the date of the alleged dispute.'' As said before it has been more than two months since the initial date.

IV. DECISION
1. I am hereby ruling in favor of the defendant,

The District Court thanks all involved.