Lawsuit: Dismissed TalkTuahEnjoyer3 v. Zombie_Bro_ [2026] DCR 46

[fish70000000000]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


TalkTuahEnjoyer3 (represented by fish70000000000)
Plaintiff

v.

Zombie_Bro_
Defendant


COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On May 25, 2026, the Plaintiff was looking to sell their excess resources when the Defendant initiated an unprovoked axe attack against the Plaintiff. The attack resulted in the Plaintiff’s death and caused a broken wrist injury that persisted after respawn as a continuing consequence of the altercation.

I. PARTIES
1. TalkTuahEnjoyer3 (Plaintiff, represented by fish70000000000)
2. Zombie_Bro_ (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. On May 25, 2026, the Defendant initiated a physical altercation with the Plaintiff.
2. During the course of the altercation, the Plaintiff sustained a broken wrist.
3. The confrontation ultimately resulted in the Plaintiff’s death.
4. Upon respawn, the Plaintiff continued to suffer from the broken wrist and related damages resulting from the incident.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Assault

The Defendant intentionally engaged in unlawful physical conduct against the Plaintiff, resulting in bodily injury and placing the Plaintiff in immediate danger during the course of the confrontation.

2. Attempted Murder

The Defendant intentionally used force against the Plaintiff with the intent to cause harm, inflicting damage exceeding three (3) hearts as defined under the server’s standard for Attempted Murder. This conduct resulted in significant injury to the Plaintiff and continuing effects upon respawn.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Award compensatory damages in the amount of $600 for physical injury, pain and suffering, and related inconvenience;
2. Grant any additional relief the Court deems just and proper.

V. EVIDENCE

P-001: The death screen confirming that the Defendant initiated the altercation which resulted in the Plaintiff's death and broken wrist.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 25th day of May 2026

Proof of Representation

 

[aubunny]

Writ of Summons

@Zombie_Bro_ is required to appear before the District Court in the case of TalkTuahEnjoyer3 v. Zombie_Bro_ [2026] DCR 46

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[Zombie_Bro_]

I Zombian Beer (formally known as Zombian Blackwood) am present to this case.

 

[aubunny]

I Zombian Beer (formally known as Zombian Blackwood) am present to this case.

You have 48 hours to respond to the complaint. Please let the Court know if you need a deadline extension to hire a qualified lawyer or to file the response yourself.

 

[Zombie_Bro_]

I would like to request a 48-hour extension because of the religious holiday that takes place soon.

 

[aubunny]

I would like to request a 48-hour extension because of the religious holiday that takes place soon.

Granted
Have a good holiday!

 

[Johnes]

Your Honour,
I will represent Defendant from now on. I'd like a 24 hour extension to go over this case and post an answer.

Spoiler: Consent to Represent

 

[aubunny]

Your Honour,
I will represent Defendant from now on. I'd like a 24 hour extension to go over this case and post an answer.

Spoiler: Consent to Represent

View attachment 83885

Granted

 

[Johnes]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

Your Honour,
Defendant moves to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint under Rule 5.12 of the Court Rules & Procedures, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

I. Plaintiff Lacks Standing​

All Plaintiffs must have standing to pursue a case (Rule 2.1 of the Court Rules & Procedures).

Standing is defined as:

1. Suffered some injury caused by a clear second party; or is affected by an application of law.
2. The cause of injury was against the law.
3. Remedy is applicable under relevant law that can be granted by a favorable decision.

Plaintiff pleads compensatory damages for "physical injury, pain and suffering, and related inconvenience" but fails to prove pecuniary loss. (Part III § 2(2)(a) of the Redmont Civil Code Act), therefore Plaintiff cannot prove they suffered any injury.

Furthermore, DOH Medicare Policy provides for full coverage for the treatment of a broken wrist and Plaintiff only aggrevated their situation by not seeking treatment.

II. Conclusion​

Defendant therefore requests that this complaint is:

• dismissed for failing to have standing, and
• give Defense's counsel legal fees to deter from any further frivolous filings by Plaintiff.

Your Honour,
we'd like to request that the deadline to post our answer is tolled pending the ruling on this MtD.

 

[aubunny]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

Your Honour,
Defendant moves to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint under Rule 5.12 of the Court Rules & Procedures, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

I. Plaintiff Lacks Standing​

All Plaintiffs must have standing to pursue a case (Rule 2.1 of the Court Rules & Procedures).

Standing is defined as:


Plaintiff pleads compensatory damages for "physical injury, pain and suffering, and related inconvenience" but fails to prove pecuniary loss. (Part III § 2(2)(a) of the Redmont Civil Code Act), therefore Plaintiff cannot prove they suffered any injury.

Furthermore, DOH Medicare Policy provides for full coverage for the treatment of a broken wrist and Plaintiff only aggrevated their situation by not seeking treatment.

II. Conclusion​

Defendant therefore requests that this complaint is:

• dismissed for failing to have standing, and
• give Defense's counsel legal fees to deter from any further frivolous filings by Plaintiff.

Your Honour,
we'd like to request that the deadline to post our answer is tolled pending the ruling on this MtD.

Deadlines tolled for the Answer to Complaint. Additionally, the Prosecution shall have 24 hours to respond to the motion to dismiss.

 

[aubunny]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

Your Honour,
Defendant moves to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint under Rule 5.12 of the Court Rules & Procedures, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

I. Plaintiff Lacks Standing​

All Plaintiffs must have standing to pursue a case (Rule 2.1 of the Court Rules & Procedures).

Standing is defined as:


Plaintiff pleads compensatory damages for "physical injury, pain and suffering, and related inconvenience" but fails to prove pecuniary loss. (Part III § 2(2)(a) of the Redmont Civil Code Act), therefore Plaintiff cannot prove they suffered any injury.

Furthermore, DOH Medicare Policy provides for full coverage for the treatment of a broken wrist and Plaintiff only aggrevated their situation by not seeking treatment.

II. Conclusion​

Defendant therefore requests that this complaint is:

• dismissed for failing to have standing, and
• give Defense's counsel legal fees to deter from any further frivolous filings by Plaintiff.

Your Honour,
we'd like to request that the deadline to post our answer is tolled pending the ruling on this MtD.

Court Order

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER- MOTION TO DISMISS

The Defendant has brought to the attention of the Court a great deficiency of standing. As without pecuniary loss, Compensatory Damages cannot be granted.

Additionally, the sentence “Grant any additional relief the Court deems just and proper.” is not a catch-all and cannot be used in place of defining clear damages.
With both of the Prayers for relief found to be invalid, the Plaintiff does not sufficiently plead a remedy to the Court that we can grant. As such, this case is dismissed without prejudice due to lack of Standing.

Additionally, Legal fees shall not be granted to the Defendant, as the RCCA allows the granting of fees “requested by the Plaintiff” to be awarded to the Defendant if they prevail. (RCCA Part 3 Section 7.e) In this instance, the Plaintiff did not request legal fees and is not entitled to the immediate award of Legal Damages. The case itself does not meet the definition of frivolous and was simply deficient; no such burden to pay from the prosecution currently exists.

So Ordered.
Magistrate Aubunny Malka